Name: Biden Administration's Selective Deportation Policy That States Say Endangers Communities Is Challenged in Supreme Court
Uploaded: 2022-11-30T19:37:55.000Z
Description: Two states challenging the Biden administration’s decision last year to focus its deportation efforts on individuals deemed to be a threat to public safety urged the Supreme Court during oral arguments on Nov. 29 not to restore the policy.

Cary Dunst

NTD Plus

News

News with integrity, from the U.S. and around the world. Focused reports and analyses that shed light on major issues the world deserves to know. NTD Evening News airs daily at 6 p.m. ET.

NTD Evening News

Jobs, Energy, and Equity Markets All Point to Resilient US Economy: Economic Analyst

Jason Perry is an Army veteran and NTD's National Security Correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Jason primarily covers border security, national defense, foreign wars, and veterans' issues.

Jason Perry

Illegal Immigrant Faces 30 Charges in Serial Rape Case

Jack Phillips is a breaking news reporter with 15 years experience who started as a local New York City reporter. Having joined The Epoch Times' news team in 2009, Jack was born and raised near Modesto in California's Central Valley. 

Jack Phillips

Arian Pasdar is an international correspondent for NTD News based in South America. His reporting focuses on immigration and key events in Latin America.

Arian Pasdar

Health News

2 New Jersey Residents Potentially Exposed to Hantavirus, Officials Say

Dave Martin is NTD's Senior Sports Reporter and sports analyst. He also hosts "Data Hub" segments during NTD's special election coverage, "The Nation Decides."

Dave Martin

76ers-Knicks Game 3: Embiid Listed as Questionable

Juliette Fairley is a freelance reporter for NTD and The Epoch Times and a graduate of Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism. Born in Chateauroux, France, and raised outside of Lackland Air Force Base in Texas, Juliette is a well-adjusted military brat. She has written for many publications across the country. Send Juliette story ideas at JulietteFairley@gmail.com

Juliette Fairley

Arleen Richards is NTD's legal correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers all major legal stories. Arleen holds a Doctor of Law (J.D.).


Arleen Richards

US News

State News

Virginia

Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down New Congressional Redistricting Map

US Transfers 1.4 Million Acres of Federal Land to Alaska

Southern Poverty Law Center Leader Pleads Not Guilty on Behalf of Center

Sam Wang is a Washington correspondent for NTD News based in Washington, D.C. Sam covers politics on Capitol Hill, and U.S.-China relations. 

Sam Wang

Citizens' Hopes and Prayers for America

Brazil's President Lula's US Visit Shows Trend Away From China: Geopolitical Analyst

Chinese Regime ‘Feeling the Squeeze’ Ahead of Trump’s Visit: Analyst

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 8)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 7)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 6)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 5)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 4)

Don Ma is an anchor and senior business correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Don is the anchor and producer of NTD's "Business Matters," which airs weekdays at 4:30 pm ET.

Don Ma

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 3)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 2)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 1)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (April 30)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (April 29)

NTD Newsroom comprises teams of reporters, editors, and producers assigned to cover breaking news and other stories.


NTD Newsroom

Fast, compelling, first-hand news from China. China in Focus airs Monday–Friday at 8 p.m. ET.

China in Focus

China Sends Warships to Pacific Drill as Tensions With Japan Rise

Reuters is a news agency owned by Thomson Reuters. It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in about 200 locations worldwide writing in 16 languages.

Reuters

We present news that is truthful and based on facts, outside of the political fog. Instead of focusing on the negative things happening around us, our mission is to give our viewers a good morning with empathetic and uplifting stories. Our aim is to provide an antidote to negativity by shining a light on the best side of people. We speak to inspiring people who positively impact communities, pursue topics that represent our common human values, and will never miss an opportunity to bring you heartwarming stories.

NTD Good Morning

2 US Embassy Personnel Assigned to Cartel Case Killed in Car Accident

The Associated Press is an American not-for-profit news agency headquartered in New York City. 

The Associated Press

Gunman Kills 8 Children, Including 7 of His Own, in Louisiana Mass Shooting

Flora Hua is a reporter based at NTD's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers China news, U.S.-China relations, and human rights issues. Flora primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus."  

Flora Hua

Trump: Seized Iranian Ship May Have ‘A Gift From China’

Joseph Lord is a congressional reporter for The Epoch Times.


Joseph Lord

Aldgra Fredly is a freelance writer covering U.S. and Asia Pacific news for The Epoch Times.

Aldgra Fredly

Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani Hospitalized in Critical Condition: Spokesman

Wildfires Across Georgia and Florida Have Destroyed Nearly 50 Homes and Are Forcing Evacuations

News you can trust from the U.S. and around the world. Critical information and insight. We cover the stories that others don’t. NTD News Today airs Monday–Friday at 11 a.m. ET.

NTD News Today

US Warns of China Hacks via Routers, Smart Devices

Juliet Song is an international correspondent exclusively covering China news for NTD. She primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus," covering U.S.-China relations, the Chinese regime's human rights abuses, and domestic unrest inside China.

Juliet Song

2 Americans Among Suspected Communist Rebels Killed in Clashes With Troops, Philippine Officials Say

3 Dead in Suspected Hantavirus Outbreak on Cruise Ship in Atlantic Ocean: WHO

Ryan Morgan is a reporter for The Epoch Times focusing on military and foreign affairs. He was previously a news writer for NTD. 


Ryan Morgan

Mari Otsu is NTD's White House correspondent based in Washington. 

Mari Otsu

World News

Middle East

Iran

3 US Warships Fend Off Iranian Attacks, Trump Says Ceasefire Still Holds

Two states challenging the Biden administration’s decision last year to focus its deportation efforts on individuals deemed to be a threat to public safety urged the Supreme Court during oral arguments on Nov. 29 not to restore the policy.

The states take the position that the federal government is illegally refusing to enforce the nation’s immigration laws by prioritizing only certain enforcement categories at the expense of others. They say that the federal Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) requires that specific criminal aliens, such as aggravated felons, have to be detained upon release from criminal custody pending a decision on whether to remove them from the country. The law also requires that aliens subject to final orders of removal must be detained pending their removal.

But instead of adhering to the INA’s mandates, the Biden administration said in a memorandum that it would embark on case-by-case determinations instead, which the states say leaves the door open for violent criminals to return to the nation’s streets.

“The law the Biden Administration is trying to ignore is crystal clear: certain illegal aliens that have committed crimes must be detained and cannot be allowed to roam freely in our communities,” said Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, in a statement released as oral arguments were getting underway in the high court.

“Keeping our citizens safe is one of the most fundamental duties of government, perhaps even the most fundamental. The Biden Administration has tried to ignore that duty, but we’re fighting every single day to remind them,” Paxton said.

In United States v. Texas, court file 22-58, Texas and Louisiana are suing the Biden administration over a policy announced in a Sept. 30, 2021, memorandum (<a href="https://www.ice.gov/doclib/news/guidelines-civilimmigrationlaw.pdf">pdf</a>) by Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas that claims it is impossible to remove the estimated 11 million illegal aliens present in the United States. Mayorkas has been heavily criticized by Republicans for his allegedly lax approach to immigration enforcement. Some Republicans want to impeach him for dereliction of duty.

“We do not have the resources to apprehend and seek the removal of every one of these noncitizens. Therefore, we need to exercise our discretion and determine whom to prioritize for immigration enforcement action,” the memo states.

Instead, the document prioritizes the arrest and deportation of suspected terrorists, people who have committed crimes, and illegal aliens recently apprehended at the border.

The memo praises the “majority of undocumented noncitizens who could be subject to removal [even though they] have been contributing members of our communities for years.”

“They include individuals who work on the frontlines in the battle against COVID, lead our congregations of faith, teach our children, do back-breaking farm work to help deliver food to our table, and contribute in many other meaningful ways.”

The Mayorkas memo was blocked this summer by federal Judge Drew Tipton, who ruled that Texas had legal standing to pursue the case because it could show the state was harmed when illegal aliens who should have been detained by the federal government found their way to the state and committed crimes there.

The now-suspended policy is similar to one enforced by then-President Barack Obama but differs from the more aggressive policy pursued by then-President Donald Trump who tried to limit the role of discretion in the enforcement of immigration laws.

The Biden administration asked the Supreme Court to stay Tipton’s order, but on July 21 it refused to do so. Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, along with the three liberal justices–Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson—dissented, indicating they would have granted the stay.

U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar emphasized the difficulty of enforcing the INA during oral arguments before the justices on Nov. 29.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had to adopt enforcement priorities because “there are more than 11 million removable non-citizens in this country, and DHS has about 6,000 interior enforcement officers,” Prelogar said.

And the argument that states have standing to challenge the memo is wrong, she said.

“They argue states can challenge any federal policy that imposes even one dollar of indirect harms on their own taxing or spending. That theory has no limiting principle. It's incompatible with our constitutional structure, and it contradicts more than 200 years of history and tradition where states could not sue the United States on this basis.”

She said the federal courts should not be “transformed into open forums for each and every policy dispute between the states and the national government.”

Chief Justice John Roberts pushed back, telling Prelogar her position on standing seemed “inconsistent” with the government’s arguments in previous cases.

Prelogar said just because the INA uses the word “shall” in enforcement provisions, that doesn’t mean that the government loses the power to exercise discretion in the enforcement process.

“Across 25 years and five presidential administrations, the agency has never implemented the INA in the manner that [the states] suggest. Given congressional funding choices, it would be impossible for DHS to do so,” she said.

Roberts told Prelogar that the word “‘shall’ means ‘shall.’” Even if Congress has passed a law that is impossible for the executive branch to enforce, it is the court’s job “to say what the law is, not whether or not it can be possibly implemented or whether there are difficulties there.”

Texas Solicitor General Judd E. Stone II told the justices that states, which “bear many of the consequences of federal immigration decisions,” have standing in the case.

Moreover, the Mayorkas memo is “unlawful” because it treats an enforcement provision as discretionary even though this court “and every previous administration have acknowledged it as mandatory.”

The administration is wrong to plead limited resources and prosecutorial discretion, which are “beside the point,” Stone said.

Justice Kagan told Stone his argument would impose an “extraordinarily onerous obligation on DHS.”

But what happens if the government lacks enforcement resources, Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked Stone.

“I'm just trying to figure out how this will play out if you were to prevail. So the government says we don't have the money to comply … then what do you do?” the justice said.

Stone replied that it was a “difficult hypothetical” to respond to.

<em>From <a href="https://www.theepochtimes.com/biden-administrations-selective-deportation-policy-that-states-say-endangers-communities-is-challenged-in-supreme-court_4891664.html">The Epoch Times</a></em>

Court

Videos

Politics

04_Top Stories

President Donald Trump

Latest Clips

Deportations

President Joe Biden

Immigration &amp; Border Security

Supreme Court

Matthew Vadum is an award-winning investigative journalist.

Matthew Vadum

Latest and breaking news, documentaries, movies, and lifestyle content on NTD+.
 
Empower your knowledge and elevate your spirit with NTD+, your go-to destination for truthful news, insightful documentaries, and captivating lifestyle content that enriches your life.

Biden Administration's Selective Deportation Policy That States Say Endangers Communities Is Challenged in Supreme Court

Full Episodes