Design, Construction Flaws at Opal Tower

AAP
By AAP
February 21, 2019Australia
share
Design, Construction Flaws at Opal Tower
Engineers and firefighters prepare to enter a 36-story high-rise building in Sydney, Australia late Christmas Eve after residents reported hearing and seeing “cracking” throughout the morning, on Dec. 24, 2018. (Screenshot/Google Maps)

Critical support beams in Sydney’s Opal Tower were left susceptible to “bursting” because they were under-designed and – in parts – made from lower-strength concrete, an independent report has found.

The newly-built block in Sydney Olympic Park was evacuated on Christmas Eve after cracks were found in the building, sparking fears it could collapse.

A NSW government-commissioned report, released publicly on Friday, found that while the building was structurally sound overall, there were a number of structural and construction issues responsible for the damage.

Horizontal support beams in the building were of inferior strength and were not compliant, while the decision to only partially grout between the beams and panels added to the problem.

“We found some of the as-constructed hob beams and panel assemblies were under-designed according to the National Construction Code and Australian Standards,” professors Mark Hoffman, John Carter and Stephen Foster said.

“This left the hob beams susceptible to failure by shear compression and bursting.”

Testing also showed lower-strength concrete was used in some hobs on level four, which “likely precipitated the observed major damage”.

The engineers’ report recommended creating databases of registered engineers and NSW building certifications, along with a building structure review board to monitor known property design flaws and shape future building codes.

About 150 of the building’s 392 units remain unoccupied.

ntd newsletter icon
Sign up for NTD Daily
What you need to know, summarized in one email.
Stay informed with accurate news you can trust.
By registering for the newsletter, you agree to the Privacy Policy.
Comments