Grace Millane and the Rise of the ’50 Shades’ Defense in Murder Trials

CNN Newsource
By CNN Newsource
February 22, 2020UK
Grace Millane and the Rise of the ’50 Shades’ Defense in Murder Trials
A photo of British backpacker Grace Millane during a vigil at Civic Square in Wellington, New Zealand, on Dec. 12, 2018. (Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

British backpacker Grace Millane was strangled to death, crammed into a suitcase, and buried in a New Zealand woodland after a Tinder date in December 2018.

On Thursday her killer, a 28-year-old man, was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum 17-year non-parole period.

The Courts of New Zealand said in a statement, “Overall, the circumstances of the murder showed a high-level of callousness, including the intimate nature of the murder itself.”

In his November 2019 trial, the prosecution argued that the man—whose name cannot be released due to a suppression order—”eroticized” Millane’s death because of a “morbid sexual interest,” and the court heard how he had taken “trophy” photos of her body and watched violent pornography while her body lay in the room.

The key pillar of the man’s defense was Millane’s death was an accident that came about as a result of consensual choking. As a consequence, media coverage of the trial was filled with details about Millane’s personal life and alleged sexual preferences, even as the accused remained anonymous.

Claims of a “sex game gone wrong” are not new. Some politicians and media outlets have even begun to refer to them as the “50 Shades” defense, after the popular “50 Shades of Grey” books and movies, which recount a woman’s relationship with a man who introduces her to BDSM (bondage, discipline, sadism, and masochism) sexual practices.

A Rise in Claims

At least 60 UK women have been killed in episodes of so-called “consensual” sexual violence since 1972, with at least 18 women dying in the last five years, according to the advocacy group “We Can’t Consent To This.”

In 45 percent of those killings, the claim that a woman’s injuries were sustained during a sex game “gone wrong” resulted in a lesser charge, a lighter sentence, an acquittal, or the death not being investigated, the group said.

Susan Edwards, a barrister and professor of law at the University of Buckingham, told CNN that 30 or 40 years ago, it was unlikely that a defendant would claim that the victim consented to sexual violence.

“He would be less likely then, I think, to try and use as an excuse that she had consented to sexual violence,” said Edwards, who has been tracking and working on domestic violence cases since the 1980s.

“And if he had, then it would have been extremely doubted—it wouldn’t have gone in any way to his credit that he was trying to use such a totally unbelievable excuse,” she added.

“Now, regrettably, there are some people that might be willing to believe it because we now live in a world where some people are tolerating this commercial sexualization of violence,” she added.

Now, claiming an assault or homicide was a case of “rough sex gone wrong” would not work as a defense, Edwards said, but could have some “mitigatory impact” on a defendant’s culpability, and sentencing. In some cases, defendants could be handed sentences with no jail time.

“To establish murder, there has to be intention. So, if they can convince the jury that there was no intention to kill, then the verdict will be one of manslaughter,” added Edwards, who has been working to make strangulation a standalone offense in the UK. In the UK, strangulation or choking is only charged if it occurs in the course of committing some other indictable offense, such as rape.

Non-fatal strangulation by an intimate partner is considered an important “risk factor” for the homicide of women, indicating a greater likelihood that they will eventually be killed. A 2008 study conducted by researchers at Johns Hopkins University and the University of Virginia found that experiencing non-fatal strangulation by an intimate partner made a woman six times more likely to be the victim of attempted murder and seven times more likely to be the victim of a homicide. Two-thirds of the cases “We Can’t Consent to This” studied involved strangulation, the group’s founder, Fiona Mackenzie, told CNN.

Making strangulation an offense in and of itself would, Edwards says, be an important step in protecting women.

“An offense of strangulation would recognize the potential seriousness—the threat and fear occasioned. Otherwise, it is lost in common assault, or assault, which does not take into consideration the life-threatening potential or the degree of fear that is created for the victim,” she added.

“That would send a symbolic message that this behavior isn’t tolerated, and hopefully would be part of a preventive measure that would prevent the escalation of these cases which result in death,” Edwards told CNN.

A Global Issue

Claims of rough sex gone wrong are of global concern.

“We’ve got a list of around 250 women who have been killed in various countries around the world by men who claim at some point that they consented to it. It seems to be especially common in places like Germany, Canada, the United States, Australia, Portugal, and Spain,” Mackenzie told CNN. She said that cases in which defendants allege consensual rough sex follow a similar pattern in other countries as they do in the UK—often, the deaths are not initially investigated as crimes, and if men are prosecuted, they will be prosecuted for manslaughter, receive light sentences, and in some cases, walk free.

In June 2019, a district court in Bielefeld, northwest Germany handed a 48-year-old man a 10-year prison sentence for the manslaughter of his wife. In November 2019, Germany’s federal court of justice ruled that the prison sentence handed to the man should be reconsidered because the defendant’s claims that his wife enjoyed being strangled during sex were not an “aggravating fact” in the case.

A spokesperson for the Bundesgerichtshof told CNN that a regional court will now resentence the man.

Canada Grappling With Cases

In Canada too, activists and experts are concerned about the proliferation of similar cases.

Lise Gotell, a professor of women’s and gender studies at the University of Alberta, began compiling data on the use of the “rough sex” defenses after a number of high-profile cases came to court.

In a preliminary search of trials heard by a judge alone, and of pretrial motions, Gotell found more than 100 cases—including non-fatal assaults, sexual assaults, and homicide—in which the defendant claimed the woman had consented to violent sex. More than half of the cases, she said, came after 2015.

“We’re not talking about consensual BDSM in most, nearly all, of the cases. These are situations of unconsensual violent sex, if not intentional murders, in which the defendants are trying to get off in using this defense,” she told CNN.

Elizabeth Sheehy, professor emeritus at the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law, told CNN that a woman’s sexual history is often used by defense lawyers in criminal trials.

“I think the allegation in and of itself, particularly if prior sexual history of the victim is used, has the ability to damage a woman’s credibility, even if there’s no kind of official recognition,” said Sheehy, who has taught criminal and sexual assault law for more than 34 years.

According to U.N. data, at least 87,000 women worldwide were intentionally killed in 2017, with more than half (50,000) of them killed by intimate partners or family members.

A Culture of Victim-Blaming

Advocates and experts say a culture of victim-blaming is getting in the way of justice.

“In every case, the woman’s sexual history, alleged sexual history, is presented in court as part of the justification for her killing—the victim-blaming and reporting on it is the same wherever you go,” Mackenzie told CNN.

“Women are blamed for their behavior,” said Toni Van Pelt, president of the National Organization for Women (NOW). “Their sex lives are always questioned—whether or not they are sexually active, and what kind of sexual activity do they participate in, and were they drinking—these things that have nothing to do with what’s happened to them.”

“There’s no emphasis on the men and the male behavior. Where is their sexual history, where is their history of violence against women, were they drinking, were they stalking, have they been in jail for this before? The emphasis is that she deserved it, because she enjoyed or had pleasure from sex,” Van Pelt added.

Experts say this victim-blaming is exacerbated by the normalization of sexual violence in culture and media.

“The commercialization of sexual violence is relevant in every plot almost, of a book or film or media—that enables the male perpetrator to rely on those kinds of discourses and narratives,” Edwards said.

By Amy Woodyatt

™ & © 2020 Cable News Network, Inc., a WarnerMedia Company. All rights reserved.
ntd newsletter icon
Sign up for NTD Daily
What you need to know, summarized in one email.
Stay informed with accurate news you can trust.
By registering for the newsletter, you agree to the Privacy Policy.