Iran Tension Unlikely to Cause a Sustained Oil Price Spike in the Long Term

Emel Akan
By Emel Akan
January 5, 2020Business News
share
Iran Tension Unlikely to Cause a Sustained Oil Price Spike in the Long Term
A flame burns at the Shell Deer Park oil refinery in Deer Park, Texas, on Aug. 31, 2017. (Gregory Bull/AP Photo)

WASHINGTON—Fears of a conflict escalation in the Middle East following the assassination of Iranian top general Qasem Soleimani by United States airstrikes may push the oil prices higher in the short term. However, a sustained surge in prices is unlikely, according to analysts.

Tensions between Washington and Tehran had escalated at a time when oil supplies started to tighten.

Member of Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its allies agreed last month to reduce oil output by an additional 500,000 barrels per day starting in January. And there were rising expectations for oil demand improvements following the positive news about the “phase one” trade deal between the United States and China.

Oil prices spiked immediately after the news of the killing of the top commander of the Iranian Quds forces at Baghdad airport. The international benchmark Brent crude jumped more than 3 percent to $68.67 per barrel on Friday. The U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) also increased 3 percent to $63.05.

The escalation of tensions could drive Brent prices above $70 in short order, according to Citigroup.

“The factors in the market pushing oil prices higher are based on the view that Iranian authorities collectively, or the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, independently, could potentially take retaliatory actions that increase the likelihood of supply disruption in the Middle East,” Edward Morse, the global head of commodities research at Citigroup said in a report.

According to Morse, the scenarios of retaliation by Iran could include attacks on oil facilities in the Gulf area, in Iraq, for example, where Western companies are investing in new oil production.

Other potential retaliations could be “attacks on pipeline oil flows or shipping through either the Strait of Hormuz or the Red Sea.”

The Strait of Hormuz is the world’s most important oil transit chokepoint as more than a fifth of the world’s oil supply flows through it. And any disruption, even a temporary one, can lead to substantial supply delays and an increase in energy prices, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Morse predicts that the fears over Iranian retaliation will continue to put upward pressure on oil prices in the short-term. However, it is unlikely to cause long-term concern.

“Despite clear short-term oil market concerns, there could be bearish factors at work later in 2020, with the possibility that Iran and the United States could find common purpose in working out a new agreement,” he wrote.

Employees of Aramco oil company
Employees of Aramco oil company stand near a heavily damaged installation in Saudi Arabia’s Khurais oil processing plant on Sept. 20, 2019. (Fayez Nureldine/AFP via Getty Images)

September Attacks

The killing of Soleimani follows the attacks in September last year on Saudi Arabia’s major oil facilities and a series of attacks targeting oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz earlier, which have raised geopolitical risks in the region. The United States blamed Iran for the attacks.

Analysts polled by S&P Global Platts say that the disruption in oil markets will be short term given a global oil supply glut and the lack of a sustained price spike following the September attacks.

On Sept. 14, Saudi Arabia’s key Abqaiq processing plant and the nearby oil field was attacked, knocking out more than half of the country’s oil output and nearly 5 percent of global supply.

The Brent crude oil jumped nearly 20 percent following the incident. However, it retreated to pre-attack levels in a few days after Saudis assured that the production loss was restored.

The September incident reveals that the oil market will accommodate a “very near-term geopolitical risk premium,” but will not continue to do so for months, Katie Bays, co-founder of Washington-based Sandhill Strategy, told S&P Global Platts.

Iran promised vengeance after the United States airstrike that killed Soleimani, along with Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, an Iraqi militia leader and one of Iran’s top lieutenants in Iraq. The United States has blamed him for last week’s assault on the American Embassy in Baghdad.

“We believe that an Iranian retaliation is almost certain,” Paul Sheldon, a chief geopolitical risk analyst at S&P Global Platts said in a note.

“The chances of a broader conflict remain below 50 percent, although risks are entering new territory. The initial market reaction indicates Brent is capped at $70 per barrel, without another major incident. The Iranian retaliation could take the form of a quick response by proxies against United States allies and assets, but a larger response is likely to be more carefully calculated and indirect in an effort to avoid outright conflict,” he said.

From The Epoch Times

ntd newsletter icon
Sign up for NTD Daily
What you need to know, summarized in one email.
Stay informed with accurate news you can trust.
By registering for the newsletter, you agree to the Privacy Policy.