Lawyers Ask Federal Appeals Court to Block Nation’s First Execution by Nitrogen Hypoxia

The Associated Press
By The Associated Press
January 17, 2024US News
share
Lawyers Ask Federal Appeals Court to Block Nation’s First Execution by Nitrogen Hypoxia
Kenneth Eugene Smith. (Alabama Department of Corrections via AP)

MONTGOMERY, Ala.—Attorneys for the first inmate slated to be put to death with nitrogen gas have asked a federal appeals court to block the execution scheduled later this month in Alabama.

Kenneth Eugene Smith’s attorneys on Monday asked the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to block his Jan. 25 execution. The appellate court will hear arguments in the case on Friday.

The state plans to place a face mask over Mr. Smith’s nose and mouth to replace breathable air with pure nitrogen—an inert gas that makes up 78 percent of the air inhaled by humans—causing him to die from lack of oxygen. The nitrogen gas would be administered for at least 15 minutes or “five minutes following a flatline indication on the EKG, whichever is longer,” according to the state protocol.

Three states—Alabama, Mississippi, and Oklahoma—have authorized nitrogen hypoxia as an execution method, but none have attempted to use it. The question of whether Alabama will ultimately be allowed to attempt the nation’s first execution using nitrogen gas could end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Mr. Smith’s attorneys appealed a judge’s Jan. 10 decision to let the execution go forward. They argued that the new nitrogen hypoxia protocol is riddled with unknowns and potential problems that could violate the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment. They said the concerns over the novel execution method and how Mr. Smith was chosen as the “test subject” should be more fully considered by a court before the execution proceeds.

“Because Mr. Smith will be the first condemned person subject to this procedure, his planned execution is an experiment that would not be performed or permitted outside this context,” Mr. Smith’s attorneys wrote in the Monday court filing.

The low-oxygen environment could cause nausea leading Mr. Smith to choke to death on his own vomit, his attorneys argued. Or if he is exposed to less than pure nitrogen, they argued he was at risk of feeling the sensation of suffocation or being left in a vegetative state instead of dying.

The Alabama attorney general’s office has called those concerns speculative and argued in court filings that the deprivation of oxygen will “cause unconsciousness within seconds, and cause death within minutes.” The state will file its objection to Mr. Smith’s request for a stay later this week.

Mr. Smith’s attorneys also argued that the mask placed over his month would also interfere with his ability to pray aloud before his execution and further argued that Alabama violated Mr. Smith’s due process rights by setting his execution date while he has ongoing appeals.

The Alabama Supreme Court on Friday rejected Mr. Smith’s appeal that it would be unconstitutionally cruel to make a second attempt to execute him after a previous attempt at a lethal injection failed. His attorneys wrote that they intend to appeal that ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Mr. Smith was strapped to a gurney in the execution chamber for nearly four hours in 2022 as the state prepared to execute him by lethal injection, his attorneys wrote. The execution was called off before any of the drugs were administered because the execution team could not get the second of two required intravenous lines connected to Mr. Smith’s veins.

Mr. Smith was one of two men convicted of the 1988 murder-for-hire slaying of a preacher’s wife. Prosecutors said Mr. Smith and the other man were each paid $1,000 to kill Elizabeth Sennett. John Forrest Parker, the other man convicted in the slaying, was executed in 2010 by lethal injection.

ntd newsletter icon
Sign up for NTD Daily
What you need to know, summarized in one email.
Stay informed with accurate news you can trust.
By registering for the newsletter, you agree to the Privacy Policy.
Comments