Mexican officials have objected to a provision in the United States-Mexico-Canada trade deal, but Mexico’s Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard said that the objection doesn’t put the deal at risk, telling reporters it is still “intact.”
Representatives from the three countries signed the latest version of the deal on Dec. 10 in Mexico City. According to House Democrats (pdf), U.S. lawmakers agreed upon a provision that labor attaches would be based in Mexico and “provide on-the-ground information about Mexico’s labor practices.” The text of the deal released by the U.S. trade representative’s office on Dec. 13 didn’t appear to include the provision, though it was added in a version presented in the House on Friday.
Ebrard told reporters it would be up to Mexico whether or not to accept the proposed diplomatic attaches, since countries decide whether to accredit foreign diplomats in their territory.
“The attaches are authorized by Mexico,” Ebrard said at a regular government news conference. “No country can assign attaches in Mexico but us.”
Ebrard also said that the treaty remains “intact.”
Prior to Ebrard’s comments, Mexico’s President Andrés Manuel López Obrador suggested the addition of the provision was sneaky, reported The Associated Press, telling reporters, “That was not agreed to and this comes out in a clandestine way.”
Jesus Seade, Mexico’s undersecretary for North America and trade negotiator, said at a press conference over the weekend that the matter of attaches was not included in the version of the bill signed on Tuesday and ratified by Mexico’s Senate two days later, The Wall Street Journal reported.
“Mexico will NEVER accept any measure that would see inspectors disguised for a simple reason: Mexican law prohibits it,” Seade wrote in a series of tweets, some of which were later deleted, adding for emphasis in another one: “NO INSPECTORS.”
Seade traveled to Washington on Sunday to discuss the situation with Robert Lighthizer, the trade representative. He also sent a letter to Lighthizer, saying Mexican officials are concerned that the United States is trying to go beyond the provisions agreed in the latest version of the bill. He said that American attaches in Mexico wouldn’t be allowed to conduct inspections, citing Mexican law.
“The obsession of Democrats with ‘enforcement,’ a unilateralist term meaning ‘force to comply,’ cost blood, was tended to with the panels,” Seade wrote in the letter. “The legitimate way to enforce, in both countries, is with our respective laws.”
The trade deal, or USMCA, includes a three-person panel comprised of one person chosen by the United States, one person chosen by Mexico, and one person from a third country agreed upon by both countries. The panel would resolve labor disputes.
Seade told reporters that the labor attaches would be “unnecessary and redundant.”
Lighthizer replied to Seade in a letter on Monday, telling him that it’s “typical” for U.S. embassies in foreign capitals to house attaches, and the U.S. Embassy in Mexico presently houses attaches from over 12 federal agencies. Mexico also has attaches stationed in the United States.
“The Administration included language in the USMCA implementing legislation authorizing up to five attachés from the Department of Labor to work with their Mexican counterparts, workers, and civil society groups on implementation of the Mexican labor reform, including by providing technical assistance and disbursing capacity building funds, and provide assistance to the new U.S. government interagency labor committee,” he wrote.
“These personnel will not be “labor inspectors” and will abide by all relevant Mexican laws. As you know, the USMCA’s first-of-its-kind, the facility-specific, rapid-response mechanism allows an independent, three-person panel chosen by both Parties to request on-site verifications in any of our three countries when there are good faith questions about whether workers at a particular facility are being denied key labor rights. But those verifications will be conducted by the independent panelists, not by the labor attachés.”
He concluded: “USMCA is a great agreement for the United States and Mexico. I look forward to working with you and your colleagues to ensure that the agreement enters into force as quickly as possible.”
Reuters contributed to this report.
From The Epoch Times
