Name: Supreme Court Hears Landmark Gun Rights Case of Domestic Violence Offender
Uploaded: 2023-11-08T08:38:16.000Z
Description: The Biden administration told the Supreme Court on Nov. 7 that a lower court ruling invalidating a federal law that bars people under domestic violence-related restraining orders from possessing firearms should be overturned.

Jack Bradley is a Washington correspondent for NTD News based in Washington, D.C. Jack previously anchored "NTD Newsroom" and worked as an assistant producer for the show. 

Jack Bradley

NTD Plus

News

News with integrity, from the United States and around the world. Focused reports and analyses that shed light on major issues the world deserves to know. NTD Evening News airs daily at 6 p.m. ET.

NTD Evening News

Lawmakers Probe CCP Threat Inside America

Arian Pasdar is an international correspondent for NTD News based in South America. His reporting focuses on immigration and key events in Latin America.

Arian Pasdar

Hezbollah Terrorist Group Rejects US-Brokered Israel-Lebanon Ceasefire

David Lam is a national correspondent based in California and a part-time anchor for "NTD Tonight." Before joining NTD he was a financial analyst.

David Lam

Photojournalist Recounts 1989 Tiananmen Massacre Experience

Sam Wang is a Washington correspondent for NTD News based in Washington, D.C. Sam covers politics on Capitol Hill, and U.S.-China relations. 

Sam Wang

Lawmakers Remember Tiananmen Square Massacre

Jason Perry is an Army veteran and NTD's national security correspondent. Jason primarily covers border security, national defense, foreign wars, and veterans' issues.

Jason Perry

New York Officials on World Cup 2026: 'We've Got This'

Cary Dunst is the news anchor for NTD Evening News. He is also the co-host of NTD Good Morning.


Cary Dunst

Tankman ‘Stands for Freedom’ 37 Years After Tiananmen Massacre, Explains Victims of Communism Memorial Chairman

Christina Corona is a California-based reporter for NTD News. She primarily covers California news, politics, and entertainment.  

Christina Corona

Hilton Holds Strong Lead in California’s Governor Race

Dave Martin is NTD's Senior Sports Reporter and sports analyst. He also hosts "Data Hub" segments during NTD's special election coverage, "The Nation Decides."

Dave Martin

2 Fans Get Permanent NBA Ban After Game 1 Selfie

Kelly McBride Ni is a news writer for NTD based in North Carolina. 


Kelly McBride Ni

Jason Blair is a national correspondent for NTD News based in California. 

Jason Blair

US News

FBI Launches Most Wanted Fraudsters List

What the People Say: Does Government Weaponize Agencies Against Political Opponents?

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (June 4)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (June 3)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (June 2)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (June 1)

Chris Beers is an NTD News anchor and political correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Chris co-anchors "NTD News Today" weekdays at 10:00 am ET.

Chris Beers

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 31)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 29)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 28)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 27)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 26)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 25)

The Associated Press is an American not-for-profit news agency headquartered in New York City. 

The Associated Press

State News

California

More Than 17,000 Under Evacuation Orders as Southern California Wildfire Threatens Homes

Rudy Blalock is a Southern California-based daily news reporter for NTD. Originally from Michigan, he moved to California in 2017 and the sunshine and ocean have kept him here since. In his free time, he may be found underwater scuba diving, on top of a mountain hiking or snowboarding, or at home meditating—which helps fuel his active lifestyle.

Rudy Blalock

40,000 Ordered to Evacuate as Chemical Tank Leaks, Threatens Explosion in California

Video of US Fighter Jet Shooting Down UFO Over Lake Huron Emerges in New Pentagon Files

Ryan Morgan is a reporter for The Epoch Times focusing on military and foreign affairs. He was previously a news writer for NTD. 


Ryan Morgan

Mari Otsu is NTD's White House correspondent based in Washington. 

Mari Otsu

World News

Middle East

Iran

3 US Warships Fend Off Iranian Attacks, Trump Says Ceasefire Still Holds

Mary Man is a writer for NTD. She has traveled around the world covering China, international news, and arts and culture.

Mary Man

Daniel Monaghan is a reporter for NTD News covering culture, social issues, and education. He holds a BA in Political Science and Government.

Daniel Monaghan

China News

Epoch Times Obtains Over 2,000 Unseen Tiananmen Square Photos on 37th Anniversary of the June 4th Massacre

NTD Newsroom comprises teams of reporters, editors, and producers assigned to cover breaking news and other stories.


NTD Newsroom

News you can trust from the U.S. and around the world. Critical information and insight. We cover the stories that others don’t. NTD News Today airs Monday–Friday at 11 a.m. ET.

NTD News Today

US Government Sues Chick-fil-A Over Religious Rights

Sports News

Kyle Busch, Two-Time NASCAR Champion, Dies at 41

Haika Mrema

Medical Plane Crash in New Mexico Mountains Kills 4, Sparks Wildfire

California Mayor Resigns, Will Plead Guilty to Acting as Chinese Agent

Reuters is a news agency owned by Thomson Reuters. It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in about 200 locations worldwide writing in 16 languages.

Reuters

Trump Calls Iran's Response to Latest US Ceasefire Proposal 'Totally Unacceptable'

The Biden administration told the Supreme Court on Nov. 7 that a lower court ruling invalidating a federal law that bars people under domestic violence-related restraining orders from possessing firearms should be overturned.

The case of United States v. Rahimi (court file 22-915) concerns a February ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit that struck down Section 922(g)(8) of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, a 1994 law that prohibits a person who is subject to a domestic restraining order from having a gun.

The 5th Circuit determined that the law had ceased to be constitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s landmark 2022 ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen. That decision held that restrictions on guns must be deeply rooted in American history if they are to survive constitutional scrutiny.

The ban on the possession of firearms by someone under a domestic restraining order “is an outlier that our ancestors would never have accepted,” the circuit court said at the time.

The case involves Zackey Rahimi of Texas, who previously entered a guilty plea to violating the statute. Mr. Rahimi was involved in five shooting incidents after the restraining order was entered against him in February 2020. After the Bruen decision was handed down, he asked the courts to review his conviction given the change in Second Amendment jurisprudence.

Second Amendment advocates say Mr. Rahimi, whose family emigrated from Afghanistan, is hardly an ideal spokesman for their cause given his checkered past, but they stand by their argument that the 5th Circuit ruled correctly.

Mr. Rahimi distanced himself from guns in a letter (<a href="https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/d42c96c1f881ce17/995338a3-full.pdf">pdf</a>) he wrote in July to a local judge and prosecutor in Tarrant County, Texas.

While he has “been incarcerated I’ve become a new person, faithful, and practicing doing my religion all the way right,” he wrote.

Mr. Rahimi wrote that he would make sure “to never break any law again, to stay away from the wrong circle, to stay away from all firearms & weapons, & to never be away from my family again.”

In a brief, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said the 5th Circuit ruling has had “significant disruptive consequences.” That court “overlooked the strong historical evidence supporting the general principle that the government may disarm dangerous individuals,” she wrote.

At the oral argument on Nov. 7, Ms. Prelogar told the justices that “guns and domestic abuse are a deadly combination.”

“As this court has said, all too often the only difference between a battered woman and a dead woman is the presence of a gun. Armed abusers also pose grave danger to police officers responding to domestic violence calls and to the public at large as Zackey Rahimi’s own conduct shows.

“To address that acute threat, Congress and 48 states and territories temporarily disarm individuals subjected to domestic violence protective orders,” she said.

The federal law targets “the most dangerous domestic abusers,” she said.

“It applies only if after notice and a hearing, a court makes an express finding that the person poses a credible threat to an intimate partner’s physical safety or imposes a specific prohibition on the use of physical force. And the disarmament lasts only as long as the order remains in effect.”

Legislatures long disarmed “those who have committed serious criminal conduct or whose access to guns poses a danger,” including “loyalists, rebels, minors, individuals with mental illness, felons, and drug addicts. Rahimi offers no historical evidence that those laws were thought to violate the right to keep and bear arms, or that the Second Amendment was originally understood to prevent legislatures from disarming dangerous individuals.”

Justice Clarence Thomas criticized Ms. Prelogar’s opening statement, questioning why she excluded “slaves and Native Americans” from her list of persons historically prohibited from having guns.

Chief Justice John Roberts suggested the law could be abused.

“Is someone who drives 30 miles an hour in a 25-mile-an-hour zone—does that person qualify as law-abiding or not?” he said.

Ms. Prelogar said, “History and tradition … support the conclusion that you can disarm those who have committed serious crimes. So it's not just that any kind of conduct that is an offense would qualify.”

Justice Samuel Alito said a brief from the Alameda County, California, Public Defenders’ office said that “some restraining orders are permanent.”

“Is that true? And if that is true, how do you justify a permanent prohibition even if any danger has disappeared?” he said.

Mr. Prelogar said she wasn’t aware of state laws that routinely enter permanent protective orders. “I don’t want to suggest that there’s a universal answer here, but these orders are generally time-limited, or provide mechanisms for courts to go back and review the finding of dangerousness for purposes of effectuating the basic command of the protective order.”

Mr. Rahimi’s attorney, assistant federal public defender Matthew Wright, contradicted Ms. Prelogar’s claim about permanent protective orders at the state level.

“By default, they can be permanent in Alabama, Colorado, Montana, Washington—no specific limit in Florida, Michigan, North Dakota, Vermont, 10 years in Arkansas, five years in California, Ohio, South Dakota, and in Texas, where the default is two years if … a finding is made that felony violence was committed, it can be five years and the time is tolled, for instance, when someone’s in jail.”

Section 922(g)(8) is clearly unconstitutional, Mr. Wright said.

When Congress enacted the law in 1994, it acted without the benefit of recent Supreme Court rulings that bolstered the Second Amendment, he said.

“So we shouldn't be surprised that they missed the mark. They made a one-sided proceeding that is short a complete proxy for a total denial of a fundamental and individual constitutional right.”

Mr. Wright said he was “not aware of any due process that would apply to the part of the order that 922(g)(8) cares about.”

Justice Neil Gorsuch pushed back, saying, “You’re not saying that before a protective order is entered, there’s no due process rights [in state court] that an individual has, are you?”

Mr. Wright replied, “To the extent that the only remedy granted by that order is forbidding abuse … I don’t think that you have any right to due process before that is entered because you have no right to abuse anyone.”

Justice Elena Kagan suggested Mr. Wright was backing away from the stronger position he argued in his brief.

“I feel like you're running away from your argument … because the implications of your argument are just so untenable.”

Accepting his argument could have an effect on “a wide variety of disarming actions, bans, what have you, that … we take for granted now because … it’s so obvious that people who have guns pose a great danger to others and you don't give guns to people who have the kind of history of domestic violence that your client has or to the mentally ill or what have you,” she said.

The Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling in the case by June 2024.

<em>From <a href="https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/biden-administration-urges-supreme-court-to-uphold-ban-on-guns-for-people-under-domestic-restraining-orders-5524767">The Epoch Times</a></em>

Latest

Videos

supreme court

Politics

04_Top Stories

second amendment

Latest Clips

Supreme Court

Matthew Vadum is an award-winning investigative journalist.

Matthew Vadum

Arleen Richards is NTD's legal correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers all major legal stories. Arleen holds a Doctor of Law (J.D.).


Arleen Richards

Executive Branch

Courts

Latest and breaking news, documentaries, movies, and lifestyle content on NTD+.
 
Empower your knowledge and elevate your spirit with NTD+, your go-to destination for truthful news, insightful documentaries, and captivating lifestyle content that enriches your life.