Name: Republicans Tell Supreme Court Congressional District Was Drawn Based on Politics, Not Race
Uploaded: 2023-10-12T05:59:56.000Z
Description: Republican state lawmakers told the Supreme Court on Oct. 11 that the justices should overturn a ruling that the South Carolina legislature racially gerrymandered a congressional district because lawmakers used political, not racial, data to justify the redrawn map.

Arleen Richards is NTD's legal correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers all major legal stories. Arleen holds a Doctor of Law (J.D.).


Arleen Richards

NTD Plus

News

News with integrity, from the U.S. and around the world. Focused reports and analyses that shed light on major issues the world deserves to know. NTD Evening News airs daily at 6 p.m. ET.

NTD Evening News

Massive Win Against 'Gender-Affirming Care': Biologist on Children's Hospital Settlement

David Zhang is a Washington correspondent focusing on national politics and U.S.–China relations. He was previously the host of the California Today and NTD Tonight.

David Zhang

Long-Awaited Documentary ‘Silent Harvest’ Debuts

Melina Wisecup is NTD's congressional correspondent based in Washington, covering Capitol Hill and campaign politics.

Melina Wisecup

Washington Roundup (May 16): Hearing Spotlights Forced Organ Harvesting in China

Daniel Monaghan is a reporter for NTD News covering culture, social issues, and education. He holds a BA in Political Science and Government.

Daniel Monaghan

White House Week in Review (May 16): China Trip, Police Week, Biolab Crackdown

Dave Martin is NTD's Senior Sports Reporter and sports analyst. He also hosts "Data Hub" segments during NTD's special election coverage, "The Nation Decides."

Dave Martin

Pistons, Cavs Get Ready For Game 7, Knicks Await Winner

NTD Newsroom comprises teams of reporters, editors, and producers assigned to cover breaking news and other stories.


NTD Newsroom

Sen. Cassidy Faces Tough Competition in GOP Primary

Jacki Thrapp is an Emmy® Award-winning journalist based in Nashville. She previously worked at The New York Post, Fox News Channel and has written a series of Off-Broadway musicals in NYC. Contact her at jacki.thrapp@epochtimes.us

Jacki Thrapp

Business News

China Eases Restrictions on US Beef, Poultry Following Beijing Summit

Sam Wang is a Washington correspondent for NTD News based in Washington, D.C. Sam covers politics on Capitol Hill, and U.S.-China relations. 

Sam Wang

Citizens React to Communist Cuba in Crisis

The Associated Press is an American not-for-profit news agency headquartered in New York City. 

The Associated Press

US News

Politics

Executive Branch

Trump Says ISIS Second-in-Command Killed in Joint US–Nigerian Mission

Federal Agencies Announce ‘Summer Surge’ of Law Enforcement into DC Ahead of 250th Anniversary

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 16)

Cary Dunst is the news anchor for NTD Evening News. He is also the co-host of NTD Good Morning.


Cary Dunst

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 15)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 14)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 13)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 12)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 11)

Don Ma is an anchor and senior business correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Don is the anchor and producer of NTD's "Business Matters," which airs weekdays at 4:30 pm ET.

Don Ma

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 10)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 9)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 8)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 7)

Fast, compelling, first-hand news from China. China in Focus airs Monday–Friday at 8 p.m. ET.

China in Focus

China Sends Warships to Pacific Drill as Tensions With Japan Rise

Reuters is a news agency owned by Thomson Reuters. It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in about 200 locations worldwide writing in 16 languages.

Reuters

We present news that is truthful and based on facts, outside of the political fog. Instead of focusing on the negative things happening around us, our mission is to give our viewers a good morning with empathetic and uplifting stories. Our aim is to provide an antidote to negativity by shining a light on the best side of people. We speak to inspiring people who positively impact communities, pursue topics that represent our common human values, and will never miss an opportunity to bring you heartwarming stories.

NTD Good Morning

2 US Embassy Personnel Assigned to Cartel Case Killed in Car Accident

Gunman Kills 8 Children, Including 7 of His Own, in Louisiana Mass Shooting

Flora Hua is a reporter based at NTD's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers China news, U.S.-China relations, and human rights issues. Flora primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus."  

Flora Hua

Trump: Seized Iranian Ship May Have ‘A Gift From China’

Joseph Lord is a congressional reporter for The Epoch Times.


Joseph Lord

Aldgra Fredly is a freelance writer covering U.S. and Asia Pacific news for The Epoch Times.

Aldgra Fredly

Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani Hospitalized in Critical Condition: Spokesman

Wildfires Across Georgia and Florida Have Destroyed Nearly 50 Homes and Are Forcing Evacuations

News you can trust from the U.S. and around the world. Critical information and insight. We cover the stories that others don’t. NTD News Today airs Monday–Friday at 11 a.m. ET.

NTD News Today

US Warns of China Hacks via Routers, Smart Devices

Juliet Song is an international correspondent exclusively covering China news for NTD. She primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus," covering U.S.-China relations, the Chinese regime's human rights abuses, and domestic unrest inside China.

Juliet Song

2 Americans Among Suspected Communist Rebels Killed in Clashes With Troops, Philippine Officials Say

Ryan Morgan is a reporter for The Epoch Times focusing on military and foreign affairs. He was previously a news writer for NTD. 


Ryan Morgan

Mari Otsu is NTD's White House correspondent based in Washington. 

Mari Otsu

World News

Middle East

Iran

3 US Warships Fend Off Iranian Attacks, Trump Says Ceasefire Still Holds

Health News

3 Dead in Suspected Hantavirus Outbreak on Cruise Ship in Atlantic Ocean: WHO

Republican state lawmakers told the Supreme Court on Oct. 11 that the justices should overturn a ruling that the South Carolina legislature racially gerrymandered a congressional district because lawmakers used political, not racial, data to justify the redrawn map.

The Supreme Court frowns on racial gerrymanders as constitutionally suspect but has adopted a hands-off attitude towards partisan gerrymanders.

In Rucho v. Common Cause (2019), the court held that partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.

Although “[e]xcessive partisanship in districting leads to results that reasonably seem unjust,” this “does not mean that the solution lies with the federal judiciary,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority at the time.

“Federal judges have no license to reallocate political power between the two major political parties, with no plausible grant of authority in the Constitution, and no legal standards to limit and direct their decisions.”

The case has been closely watched because it could affect Republicans’ ability to maintain what at present is a thin majority in the U.S. House of Representatives after next year’s congressional elections.

The congressional seat is currently held by Rep. Nancy Mace, a Republican.

Ms. Mace was elected to her second term in 2022 with 56.4 percent of the popular vote, beating Democrat Annie Andrews, who won 42.5 percent of the vote. In 2020, she narrowly defeated incumbent Democrat Joe Cunningham by a margin of 50.6 to 49.3 percent.

Republicans outnumber Democrats in the state’s delegation to the U.S. House by 6 to 1. Ms. Mace’s district covers the Atlantic shoreline, including Charleston and Hilton Head. Both of the state’s U.S. senators are Republicans.

The case is Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP (court file 22-807), an appeal against a ruling of the U.S. District Court in South Carolina. State Sen. Thomas Alexander, a Republican, is president of the South Carolina Senate.

In January, following an eight-day trial, a three-member panel of the district court ordered that a new map be drawn for South Carolina’s 1st congressional district, determining that the 2022 map violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment because it had been calculated to water down the power of black voters.

The district court did not receive direct evidence that race was used by mapmakers but relied on experts who said the map could not have been drawn without recourse to racial demographics.

All members of the panel were appointed by Democrats. Two of the judges, Mary Geiger Lewis, and Richard Gergel, were appointed by President Barack Obama. The other judge, Toby Heytens, was appointed by President Joe Biden.

The appeal was filed by South Carolina Republicans, including Mr. Alexander and G. Murrell Smith Jr., speaker of the South Carolina House of Representatives.

The two lawmakers said in their February brief that the panel failed to accept the usual legal presumption that the legislature acted in good faith when carrying out redistricting.

In striking down “an isolated portion” of the congressional district “as a racial gerrymander,” the panel “abandoned all pretext of extraordinary caution in this case.”

“The result is a thinly reasoned order that presumes bad faith and is riddled with legal mistakes,” the brief stated.

On the other side, the NAACP and its supporters argue that black voters were targeted and that the district court ruled correctly in finding the electoral map was discriminatory.

They say that after the 2020 census results were known, the state drew the 1st congressional district by moving black voters, who tend to vote Democrat, next door into the 6th congressional district, which is held by Rep. Jim Clyburn, a Democrat. They argue that the map drawers were motivated primarily by race, which would violate the 14th Amendment and the 15th Amendment, which provides that the right to vote won’t be “denied or abridged” because of race.

During oral argument on Oct. 11, Justice Neil Gorsuch said the court accepts “as a given” that “the legislature here did seek to pursue a partisan gerrymander, if you will, or a partisan tilt, I think, is their preferred term, and that that’s permissible under this court's precedents.”

John M. Gore, attorney for the Republicans, told the justices that the district is “not a racial gerrymander.”

Instead, the General Assembly “largely preserved District 1 from the constitutional benchmark plan and made changes based on traditional criteria and politics.”

The district court “acknowledged that the General Assembly pursued a political goal of increasing District 1’s Republican vote share. It achieved that goal by moving Republicans into the district and Democrats out of the district. All of the direct evidence confirms that it used political data, not racial data, to identify Republicans and Democrats.”

Despite the district court’s finding of a racial gerrymander, the panel still found that the state legislature “made political changes in other parts of District 1 without using a racial target. The General Assembly had no reason to and did not use a racial target. It used political data to pursue its political goals,” Mr. Gore said.

The lower court’s decision must be reversed, or it “will undermine this court’s holding that partisan gerrymandering claims are not justiciable.”

Partisan gerrymander claims can masquerade as racial gerrymander claims, Mr. Gore said.

“Partisan gerrymandering claims can always be repackaged as racial gerrymandering claims if all plaintiffs in lower courts have to do is ignore direct evidence of intent, infer a racial target from the correlation between race and politics, and point to malleable expert analysis.”

Justice Sonia Sotomayor told Mr. Gore that circumstantial evidence of race-based targeting can be enough.

In Cooper v. Harris (2017), the court was “clear you don’t need a smoking gun, and if you don’t need a smoking gun, you don’t need direct evidence.”

But Justice Samuel Alito told the attorney the Supreme Court is not required to “simply rubber-stamp” the district court’s findings, “particularly in a case in which … the basis for a judgment in favor of the [NAACP] relies very heavily, if not entirely, on expert reports.”

NAACP attorney Leah Aden told the justices that the district court was correct to find “that race predominated over partisanship in CD1’s design based on strong factual findings, including that after map drawers moved more than 193,000 people in and out of CD1, its BVAP [i.e. black voting-age population] remained identical as in the 2011 map.”

“In so doing, mapmakers sorted more than 30,000 black Charlestonians based on their race, removing 11 of the 12 precincts with the highest black voting-age populations. This massive movement disregarded the least change approach that the state applied statewide and that mapmakers admitted they abandoned only in Charleston County, which had been CD1's historical anchor.”

Chief Justice Roberts told Ms. Aden that the Supreme Court has “never had a case where there’s been no direct evidence, no map, no strangely configured districts, a very large amount of political evidence, whether the district court chose to credit it or not, and, instead, [with] it all resting on circumstantial evidence.”

Ms. Aden told the chief justice she disagreed.

The state legislature moved “193,000 people around, and they can only explain it as being by coincidence,” she said.

In addition, “30,000 Charlestonians [were] moved out of CD1, out of their home county.”

Ms. Aden told The Epoch Times after the hearing that she was optimistic about her side’s chances.

“I think that we made clear that the standard for overturning a factual finding of a racial gerrymandering is a high one,” she said in an interview.

“This court is not tasked with having another mini-trial on what evidence we did or did not establish, and we convinced three judges that there was a racial gerrymander, and I believe that will be respected by this court.”

The NAACP held a rally on the courthouse steps after the hearing.

Brenda Murphy, president of the NAACP’s South Carolina State Conference, said the legislators who approved the map “are perpetuating” the state’s “long, sordid history of enslavement and systemic racism.”

“There is no place for racially discriminatory gerrymandering in a functioning democracy.”

The Epoch Times has reached out to Mr. Gore for comment.

<em>Sam Dorman contributed to this article.</em>

<em>From <a href="https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/republicans-tell-supreme-court-congressional-district-was-drawn-based-on-politics-not-race-5508136">The Epoch Times</a></em>

Latest

Videos

supreme court

04_Top Stories

South Carolina

Latest Clips

Supreme Court

Matthew Vadum is an award-winning investigative journalist.

Matthew Vadum

Tiffany Meier is an anchor, China news investigative reporter, and producer for NTD News based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Tiffany anchors NTD's flagship shows "NTD Evening News" and "China in Focus" and co-moderates NTD's special election coverage "The Nation Decides." She produced the award-winning NTD Original documentary "Hollywood Takeover: China's Control in the Film Industry."


Tiffany Meier

2024 Elections

Courts

Latest and breaking news, documentaries, movies, and lifestyle content on NTD+.
 
Empower your knowledge and elevate your spirit with NTD+, your go-to destination for truthful news, insightful documentaries, and captivating lifestyle content that enriches your life.