Name: Supreme Court Appears Poised to Back Trump in Ballot Challenge Case
Uploaded: 2024-02-09T04:59:23.000Z
Description: WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Feb. 8 heard oral arguments in the high-profile case involving former President Donald Trump's bid to remain on the Colorado primary ballot, expressing skepticism of the arguments in favor of removing him.

Jack Bradley is a Washington correspondent for NTD News based in Washington, D.C. Jack previously anchored "NTD Newsroom" and worked as an assistant producer for the show. 

Jack Bradley

NTD Plus

News

News with integrity, from the U.S. and around the world. Focused reports and analyses that shed light on major issues the world deserves to know. NTD Evening News airs daily at 6 p.m. ET.

NTD Evening News

China’s Broken Promises Loom Over New Trade Deals

David Lam is a national correspondent based in California and a part-time anchor for "NTD Tonight." Before joining NTD he was a financial analyst.

David Lam

Californians React as Trump Calls for Gas Tax Suspension

Arleen Richards is NTD's legal correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers all major legal stories. Arleen holds a Doctor of Law (J.D.).


Arleen Richards

Federal Agencies Announce ‘Summer Surge’ of Law Enforcement into DC Ahead of 250th Anniversary

Christina Corona is a California-based reporter for NTD News. She primarily covers California news, politics, and entertainment.  

Christina Corona

Trump Administration Reports Zero Border Releases

Arian Pasdar is an international correspondent for NTD News based in South America. His reporting focuses on immigration and key events in Latin America.

Arian Pasdar

US to Host 1st Ever World Cup Final Halftime Show, Featuring Shakira, Madonna

Savannah Pointer is a politics reporter for The Epoch Times. She can be reached at savannah.pointer@epochtimes.us

Savannah Hulsey Pointer

Jason Perry is an Army veteran and NTD's National Security Correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Jason primarily covers border security, national defense, foreign wars, and veterans' issues.

Jason Perry

Health News

Texas Children's Hospital to Open First-Ever Detransition Clinic Under Deal With DOJ

Sam Wang is a Washington correspondent for NTD News based in Washington, D.C. Sam covers politics on Capitol Hill, and U.S.-China relations. 

Sam Wang

Citizens Honor Police for Their Service and Sacrifice

Cary Dunst is the news anchor for NTD Evening News. He is also the co-host of NTD Good Morning.


Cary Dunst

Trump ‘Projecting American Influence and Leadership’ on Iran Issue in Beijing: China Expert

Chris Bob is a reporter for NTD and a host of "Profiles of Service." He is also a small business owner. Chris graduated from Union College with a concentration in politics and religion in Russia and the former Soviet Union.

Chris Bob

Senate Panel Advances Crypto Regulation Bill

Jason Blair is a national correspondent for NTD News based in California. 

Jason Blair

Lawmakers Weigh ‘Sanctuary’ Polices After Woman’s Death in Virginia

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 15)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 14)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 13)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 12)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 11)

Don Ma is an anchor and senior business correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Don is the anchor and producer of NTD's "Business Matters," which airs weekdays at 4:30 pm ET.

Don Ma

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 10)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 9)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 8)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 7)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 6)

NTD Newsroom comprises teams of reporters, editors, and producers assigned to cover breaking news and other stories.


NTD Newsroom

Fast, compelling, first-hand news from China. China in Focus airs Monday–Friday at 8 p.m. ET.

China in Focus

China Sends Warships to Pacific Drill as Tensions With Japan Rise

Reuters is a news agency owned by Thomson Reuters. It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in about 200 locations worldwide writing in 16 languages.

Reuters

We present news that is truthful and based on facts, outside of the political fog. Instead of focusing on the negative things happening around us, our mission is to give our viewers a good morning with empathetic and uplifting stories. Our aim is to provide an antidote to negativity by shining a light on the best side of people. We speak to inspiring people who positively impact communities, pursue topics that represent our common human values, and will never miss an opportunity to bring you heartwarming stories.

NTD Good Morning

2 US Embassy Personnel Assigned to Cartel Case Killed in Car Accident

The Associated Press is an American not-for-profit news agency headquartered in New York City. 

The Associated Press

US News

Gunman Kills 8 Children, Including 7 of His Own, in Louisiana Mass Shooting

Flora Hua is a reporter based at NTD's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers China news, U.S.-China relations, and human rights issues. Flora primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus."  

Flora Hua

Trump: Seized Iranian Ship May Have ‘A Gift From China’

Joseph Lord is a congressional reporter for The Epoch Times.


Joseph Lord

Aldgra Fredly is a freelance writer covering U.S. and Asia Pacific news for The Epoch Times.

Aldgra Fredly

Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani Hospitalized in Critical Condition: Spokesman

Wildfires Across Georgia and Florida Have Destroyed Nearly 50 Homes and Are Forcing Evacuations

News you can trust from the U.S. and around the world. Critical information and insight. We cover the stories that others don’t. NTD News Today airs Monday–Friday at 11 a.m. ET.

NTD News Today

US Warns of China Hacks via Routers, Smart Devices

Juliet Song is an international correspondent exclusively covering China news for NTD. She primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus," covering U.S.-China relations, the Chinese regime's human rights abuses, and domestic unrest inside China.

Juliet Song

2 Americans Among Suspected Communist Rebels Killed in Clashes With Troops, Philippine Officials Say

Ryan Morgan is a reporter for The Epoch Times focusing on military and foreign affairs. He was previously a news writer for NTD. 


Ryan Morgan

Mari Otsu is NTD's White House correspondent based in Washington. 

Mari Otsu

World News

Middle East

Iran

3 US Warships Fend Off Iranian Attacks, Trump Says Ceasefire Still Holds

3 Dead in Suspected Hantavirus Outbreak on Cruise Ship in Atlantic Ocean: WHO

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Feb. 8 heard oral arguments in the high-profile case involving former President Donald Trump's bid to remain on the Colorado primary ballot, expressing skepticism of the arguments in favor of removing him.

Lawyer Jason Clifford Murray, who argued for the six Colorado voters who petitioned to remove President Trump from the ballot, at times frustrated judges by sidestepping questions about the consequences of a ruling in his favor.

Article 2 gives states broad powers to run elections, Mr. Murray argued, and those powers involve removing ineligible candidates from the ballot—even in a national election—through the process of their choosing.

The justices expressed skepticism that a ruling affirming the Colorado decision would settle the matter.
<h2>State Authority Limits</h2>
"Why should a single state get to decide who gets to be the president of the United States?" Justice Elena Kagan asked. "That means is quite extraordinary."

Mr. Murray said that wasn't the case because the Supreme Court would ultimately make a decision that could inform all other states to take Colorado's record of fact—largely based on the Jan. 6 Select Committee report—as settled.

This answer drew several more hypothetical situations of chaos from the justices, who pointed out that states have different processes for adjudicating ballot issues, meaning that several different records of fact and decisions could come before the Supreme Court.

In that case, why should they accept one over another? "Would we have to determine appropriate rule of evidence ... standard of proof?" Justice Samuel Alito asked. "Would we give any deference to these state court judges, some of whom are elected. ... Would we have to have our own trial?"

Mr. Murray answered no, but that the court could do an independent review of Colorado's record. Justice Alito asked what would happen if two sets of decisions and records were presented before the court, and Mr. Murray couldn't answer.

Justice Alito said he was trying to invite Mr. Murray to "grapple with the consequences of the argument you're advancing" and the potential "unmanageable situation" that would arise, and Mr. Murray again asked the court to write an opinion affirming the Colorado court's finding that President Trump engaged in "insurrection."

"What about democracy, the right of people to elect the candidate of their choice?" Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked, telling Mr. Murray that his position could disenfranchise a great number of voters. Mr. Murray said that Section 3 was intended to protect democracy, such as through preventing President Trump, who he alleged disenfranchised 80 million Americans who'd voted against him, from taking office again.

"It just doesn't seem like a state call," Justice Amy Coney Barrett said.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson asked Mr. Murray about the lack of uniformity that this decision could create, and Mr. Murray again answered that the Supreme Court could write an opinion that could create uniformity.

"I understand that we could resolve it for uniformity," she responded, but asked why he thought that the framers would design a situation that would create an interim of great difference in the meantime.

Mr. Murray said their primary concern was that insurrectionists wouldn't hold office, and it was "weird to say states can't enforce" Section 3 to that effect.

Justice Clarence Thomas said he was aware of the many examples of states using Section 3 to bar insurrectionists from state offices in the wake of the Civil War, and asked Mr. Murray to provide cases of states doing the same with national candidates, which he didn't have. Justice Thomas was skeptical that Section 3 was intended to allow the South to block a national candidate.

Justice Kavanaugh suggested that Mr. Murray was looking for legal authority in the wrong place—that the 14th Amendment was meant to augment state powers and Section 3 didn't mention state powers at all. Section 5, meanwhile, adds that Congress has authority to enact legislation regarding these matters.

Mr. Murray answered that Section 5 doesn't expressly say that only Congress has such powers.

Justice Neil Gorsuch asked Mr. Murray whether he held that state authority to enforce federal elections has to come from constitutional authority, and Mr. Murray agreed. Justice Gorsuch then said that in seeking to enforce Section 3, the authority also needs to come from Section 3.

Mr. Murray argued that authority from Article 2 would allow states to enforce Section 3, but several justices commented that this could be taken to be adding a qualification to the presidency, which would be unconstitutional.
<h2>'Serious Threat?'</h2>
Colorado Solicitor General Shannon Stevenson argued for the Colorado secretary of state and largely deferred to Mr. Murray's arguments regarding the legality of Colorado's actions.

Justice Alito asked Ms. Stevenson about the possibility that if Colorado banned President Trump, then other states would “retaliate” and bar other candidates.

Ms. Stevenson replied: “I think we have to have faith in our system that people will follow their election policies and processes appropriately, that they will take realistic views of what insurrection is under the 14th Amendment.”

“I don’t think that this court should take those threats too seriously.”

Justice Alito followed up, asking, “You don’t think that’s a serious threat?”

“I think we have to proceed on the assumption that it’s not a serious threat. I think we have institutions in place to handle those types of allegations,” Ms. Stevenson responded.

Justice Alito asked, “What are those institutions?”

“Our states, there are electoral rules, the administrators who enforce those rules, the courts that will review these decisions, and up to this court to ultimately review that decision,” Ms. Stevenson replied.
<h2>Trump Responds</h2>
President Trump weighed in on the case outside his Mar-a-Lago residence in Palm Beach, Florida.

“It’s a very beautiful process,” he said, referring to the oral argument. “I hope that democracy in this country will continue because, right now, we have a very, very tough situation with all of the radical left ideas, with the weaponization of politics. They’ve weaponized it like it’s never been weaponized before. It’s totally illegal, but they do it anyway.”

After giving a news conference, he headed to Nevada, where he said he expected to have “a very big night” as the only major contender participating in the state’s Republican caucus.
<h2>Reactions</h2>
Speaking outside the courthouse, Mr. Murray expressed confidence after the oral argument but acknowledged that he was asking the court to recognize “something extraordinary, which is that for the first time in our nation’s history, a major candidate for president of the United States is ineligible for that office under the Constitution.”

He added that if his clients lose, “we, as the rest of the country should do, would abide by the result.”

After the oral argument, a group of state secretaries of state criticized the Colorado Supreme Court decision.

“It’s a pretty clear American value that each voter should get to make their decision and that’s how we decide who our party’s nominees are going to be,” Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose said outside of the Supreme Court.

“It shouldn’t be judges, and it shouldn’t be secretaries of state that make that decision. It should be the voters.”

Mr. LaRose and secretaries of state from Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Idaho, Indiana, Montana, Nebraska, Tennessee, and West Virginia submitted an amicus brief arguing that Section 3 didn’t empower people in their positions to disqualify candidates for federal office.

<em>Samantha Flom contributed to this report.</em>

<em>From <a href="https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/supreme-court-appears-poised-to-back-trump-in-ballot-challenge-case-5583427">The Epoch Times</a></em>

Latest

trump

Videos

Politics

01_Lead Story

04_Top Stories

Premium Picks

Latest Clips

Management

Supreme Court

Catherine Yang is a reporter for The Epoch Times based in New York.

Catherine Yang

02_Second Lead

Courts

Donald Trump

Latest and breaking news, documentaries, movies, and lifestyle content on NTD+.
 
Empower your knowledge and elevate your spirit with NTD+, your go-to destination for truthful news, insightful documentaries, and captivating lifestyle content that enriches your life.