Name: Supreme Court Struggles With Regulation of Social Media
Uploaded: 2024-02-27T03:37:40.000Z
Description: Florida and Texas should be allowed to regulate how social media platforms moderate content, lawyers for the states told the Supreme Court on Feb. 26.

Jack Bradley is a Washington correspondent for NTD News based in Washington, D.C. Jack previously anchored "NTD Newsroom" and worked as an assistant producer for the show. 

Jack Bradley

NTD Plus

News

News with integrity, from the U.S. and around the world. Focused reports and analyses that shed light on major issues the world deserves to know. NTD Evening News airs daily at 6 p.m. ET.

NTD Evening News

China’s Broken Promises Loom Over New Trade Deals

David Lam is a national correspondent based in California and a part-time anchor for "NTD Tonight." Before joining NTD he was a financial analyst.

David Lam

Californians React as Trump Calls for Gas Tax Suspension

Arleen Richards is NTD's legal correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers all major legal stories. Arleen holds a Doctor of Law (J.D.).


Arleen Richards

Federal Agencies Announce ‘Summer Surge’ of Law Enforcement into DC Ahead of 250th Anniversary

Christina Corona is a California-based reporter for NTD News. She primarily covers California news, politics, and entertainment.  

Christina Corona

Trump Administration Reports Zero Border Releases

Arian Pasdar is an international correspondent for NTD News based in South America. His reporting focuses on immigration and key events in Latin America.

Arian Pasdar

US to Host 1st Ever World Cup Final Halftime Show, Featuring Shakira, Madonna

Savannah Pointer is a politics reporter for The Epoch Times. She can be reached at savannah.pointer@epochtimes.us

Savannah Hulsey Pointer

Jason Perry is an Army veteran and NTD's National Security Correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Jason primarily covers border security, national defense, foreign wars, and veterans' issues.

Jason Perry

Health News

Texas Children's Hospital to Open First-Ever Detransition Clinic Under Deal With DOJ

Sam Wang is a Washington correspondent for NTD News based in Washington, D.C. Sam covers politics on Capitol Hill, and U.S.-China relations. 

Sam Wang

Citizens Honor Police for Their Service and Sacrifice

Cary Dunst is the news anchor for NTD Evening News. He is also the co-host of NTD Good Morning.


Cary Dunst

Trump ‘Projecting American Influence and Leadership’ on Iran Issue in Beijing: China Expert

Chris Bob is a reporter for NTD and a host of "Profiles of Service." He is also a small business owner. Chris graduated from Union College with a concentration in politics and religion in Russia and the former Soviet Union.

Chris Bob

Senate Panel Advances Crypto Regulation Bill

Jason Blair is a national correspondent for NTD News based in California. 

Jason Blair

Lawmakers Weigh ‘Sanctuary’ Polices After Woman’s Death in Virginia

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 15)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 14)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 13)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 12)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 11)

Don Ma is an anchor and senior business correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Don is the anchor and producer of NTD's "Business Matters," which airs weekdays at 4:30 pm ET.

Don Ma

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 10)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 9)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 8)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 7)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 6)

NTD Newsroom comprises teams of reporters, editors, and producers assigned to cover breaking news and other stories.


NTD Newsroom

Fast, compelling, first-hand news from China. China in Focus airs Monday–Friday at 8 p.m. ET.

China in Focus

China Sends Warships to Pacific Drill as Tensions With Japan Rise

Reuters is a news agency owned by Thomson Reuters. It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in about 200 locations worldwide writing in 16 languages.

Reuters

We present news that is truthful and based on facts, outside of the political fog. Instead of focusing on the negative things happening around us, our mission is to give our viewers a good morning with empathetic and uplifting stories. Our aim is to provide an antidote to negativity by shining a light on the best side of people. We speak to inspiring people who positively impact communities, pursue topics that represent our common human values, and will never miss an opportunity to bring you heartwarming stories.

NTD Good Morning

2 US Embassy Personnel Assigned to Cartel Case Killed in Car Accident

The Associated Press is an American not-for-profit news agency headquartered in New York City. 

The Associated Press

US News

Gunman Kills 8 Children, Including 7 of His Own, in Louisiana Mass Shooting

Flora Hua is a reporter based at NTD's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers China news, U.S.-China relations, and human rights issues. Flora primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus."  

Flora Hua

Trump: Seized Iranian Ship May Have ‘A Gift From China’

Joseph Lord is a congressional reporter for The Epoch Times.


Joseph Lord

Aldgra Fredly is a freelance writer covering U.S. and Asia Pacific news for The Epoch Times.

Aldgra Fredly

Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani Hospitalized in Critical Condition: Spokesman

Wildfires Across Georgia and Florida Have Destroyed Nearly 50 Homes and Are Forcing Evacuations

News you can trust from the U.S. and around the world. Critical information and insight. We cover the stories that others don’t. NTD News Today airs Monday–Friday at 11 a.m. ET.

NTD News Today

US Warns of China Hacks via Routers, Smart Devices

Juliet Song is an international correspondent exclusively covering China news for NTD. She primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus," covering U.S.-China relations, the Chinese regime's human rights abuses, and domestic unrest inside China.

Juliet Song

2 Americans Among Suspected Communist Rebels Killed in Clashes With Troops, Philippine Officials Say

Ryan Morgan is a reporter for The Epoch Times focusing on military and foreign affairs. He was previously a news writer for NTD. 


Ryan Morgan

Mari Otsu is NTD's White House correspondent based in Washington. 

Mari Otsu

World News

Middle East

Iran

3 US Warships Fend Off Iranian Attacks, Trump Says Ceasefire Still Holds

3 Dead in Suspected Hantavirus Outbreak on Cruise Ship in Atlantic Ocean: WHO

Florida and Texas should be allowed to regulate how social media platforms moderate content, lawyers for the states told the Supreme Court on Feb. 26.

During oral arguments, the justices seemed to be grasping for a new rule they could use to apply free speech principles to online discussions.

But there are “a bunch of land mines,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett said.

“And if that's a land mine, if what we say about this is that this is speech that's entitled to First Amendment protection, I do think then that has Section 230 implications for another case, and so it's always tricky to write an opinion when you know there might be land mines that would affect things later,” she said.

This is the first time the nation’s highest court has reviewed state laws that deem social media companies “common carriers,” a status that might allow states to impose utility-style regulations on platforms and forbid them from discriminating against users based on their political viewpoints.

Justice Clarence Thomas previously advanced the common carrier theory. He has also criticized <a href="https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46751">Section 230</a> of the federal Communications Decency Act of 1996. Section 230 says, “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."

The provision generally protects internet service providers and companies from being held liable for what users say on their platforms. Supporters say the provision, sometimes called “the 26 words that created the internet,” has fostered a climate online in which free speech has flourished.

Chief Justice John Roberts suggested during the hearing that governments were ill-suited to regulate rapidly changing technologies.

It would be an “inflection point” for the government to deem the companies common carriers.

“Social media platforms, the internet, all of that stuff is an incredibly dynamic market,” the chief justice said. “The government … maybe not so much.”

Decisions in the two cases are expected by June 2024 as this year’s presidential and congressional election seasons heat up.
<h2>Competing First Amendment Rights</h2>
Observers and activists on the left and right are closely watching the cases.

At stake is the right of individual Americans to freely express themselves online and the right of social media platforms to make editorial decisions about the content they host. Both rights are protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Republicans and conservatives were outraged when platforms acted in concert to ban President Donald Trump in January 2021, blocked a potentially election-altering New York Post article about Hunter Biden’s laptop in 2020, and silenced dissenting opinions about the origins of the COVID-19 virus, the treatments for the disease it causes, and the vaccines. They say that social media platforms have become the new town square and that users’ speech therefore enjoys constitutional protection.

Democrats and liberals, on the other hand, claim the platforms don’t do enough to weed out so-called hate speech and alleged misinformation, which they consider to be pressing social problems.

The challenge to the Florida statute is Moody v. NetChoice LLC; the challenge to the Texas law is NetChoice LLC v. Paxton. On Feb. 26, the justices heard nearly four hours of oral arguments.

NetChoice, a coalition of trade associations representing social media companies and e-commerce businesses, challenged a <a href="https://www.flsenate.gov/Committees/billsummaries/2021/html/2345">Florida law</a> that makes it a violation for a social media platform to deplatform a political candidate, punishable by a $250,000 per day fine.

The law also establishes restrictions on deplatforming other users and requires consistent application of moderation rules.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit halted part of the law and Florida appealed to the Supreme Court.

When signing the law in 2021, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, said it ensures Floridians "are guaranteed protection against the Silicon Valley elites."

“If Big Tech censors enforce rules inconsistently, to discriminate in favor of the dominant Silicon Valley ideology, they will now be held accountable,” he said at the time.

President Donald Trump filed a brief with the Supreme Court in October 2022 as a private citizen in support of Florida.

“Recent experience has fostered a widespread and growing concern that behemoth social media platforms are using their power to suppress political opposition," his brief stated.

Ohio, Arizona, Missouri, Texas, and 12 other states argued in a court brief that the internet is the modern-day public square and that social media platforms engaging in censorship “undermine the free exchange of ideas that free speech protections exist to facilitate.”

The 11th Circuit struck down part of the Florida statute, finding that “with minor exceptions, the government can’t tell a private person or entity what to say or how to say it.”

Even the “biggest” platforms are “private actors whose rights the First Amendment protects … [and] their so-called content-moderation decisions constitute protected exercises of editorial judgment.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit took the opposite tack, finding a Texas <a href="https://legiscan.com/TX/text/HB20/id/2424328">anti-deplatforming law</a> constitutional and rejecting the “idea that corporations have a freewheeling First Amendment right to censor what people say.”

Both state laws require platforms to explain their content moderation decisions, a mandate the platforms consider to be overly burdensome.
<h2>Oral Arguments</h2>
Florida Solicitor General Henry Whitaker told the justices during oral arguments that not upholding his state’s law would hurt the ability of online users to discuss issues of public importance.

“Internet platforms today control the way millions of Americans communicate with each other and with the world. The platforms achieved that success by marketing themselves as neutral forums for free speech. Now that they host the communications of billions of users, they sing a very different tune,” arguing they have a broad First Amendment right “to censor anything they host on their sites, even when doing so contradicts their own representations to consumers.”

“But the design of the First Amendment is to prevent the suppression of speech, not to enable it. That is why the telephone company and the delivery service have no First Amendment right to use their services as a choke point to silence those they disfavor,” the lawyer said.

“The platforms do not have a First Amendment right to apply their censorship policies in an inconsistent manner and to censor and deplatform certain users.”

Justice Brett Kavanaugh said Mr. Whitaker left out how the First Amendment applies only to government action.

“You left out what I understand to be three key words … ‘By the government,’” the justice said.

NetChoice attorney Paul Clement said Florida’s law was flatly unconstitutional.

The state’s “effort to level the playing field and to fight the perceived bias of big tech violates the First Amendment several times over. It interferes with editorial discretion. It compels speech. It discriminates on the basis of content, speaker, and … viewpoint,” Mr. Clement said.

“And it does all this in the name of promoting free speech but loses sight of the first principle of the First Amendment, which is it only applies to state action.”

Weighing in on behalf of the Biden administration, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said that social media platforms may be regulated by governments, but they “have to stay within the bounds of the First Amendment.”

“And these state laws which restrict the speech of the platforms to enhance the relative voice of certain users don't withstand constitutional scrutiny,” she said.
<h2>Content Moderation as 'Censorship?'</h2>
Justice Samuel Alito suggested that content moderation is simply a convenient “euphemism” for “censorship.”

And he pushed back against Mr. Clement’s contention that the Texas law’s transparency mandates were too onerous for the platforms, saying social media platforms outside the United States have managed to comply with such rules.

Justice Thomas asked Mr. Clement if platform moderation is considered speech when an algorithm is taking action on a post.

Mr. Clement replied in the negative, saying that algorithms are designed by people.

But what happens when there is a “deep learning algorithm” that teaches itself, Justice Thomas replied.

Justice Barrett questioned whether the platforms' moderation policies could be compared to the editorial discretion exercised by newspapers.

She offered a hypothetical example in which TikTok was using an algorithm that favored pro-Palestinian posts over pro-Israel posts.

“If you have an algorithm do it, is it not speech?” the justice asked.

Justice Elena Kagan said that platforms allow most posts but still draw the line at some kind of misinformation, bullying, or so-called hate speech.

“Why isn’t that a classic First Amendment violation?” Justice Kagan said.

Justices Alito and Sonia Sotomayor said they were leaning toward vacating the injunction against the Florida law and sending the case back to the 11th Circuit.

Justice Sotomayor added she may vote to affirm the injunction while also remanding the case to the circuit court.

Justice Sotomayor also suggested the Florida statute was too broadly written and could cover online marketplaces such as Etsy.

“This is so, so broad. It’s covering almost everything,” the justice said. “The one thing I know about the internet is that its variety is infinite.”

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson questioned why the prohibition in the Florida statute against deplatforming political candidates didn’t qualify as “enforcing anti-discrimination principles?”

Mr. Clement replied that “it doesn’t take much to register in Florida.” The law allows minor candidates to “post anything they want” because they know they can “cause us to fundamentally change our editorial policies[.]”

Texas Solicitor General Aaron Nielson said the social media platforms cannot be left to their own devices because they favor some speech over other speech.

“This is not the first time that new technology has been used to stifle speech. Telegraphs also discriminated based on viewpoint, prompting … a national scandal.

“Yet, under the platforms' theory, Western Union was just making editorial choices not to transmit pro-union views. Today, millions of Americans don't visit friends or family or even go to work … [in] person. Everybody is online. The modern public square.

“Yet, if platforms that passively host the speech of billions of people are themselves the speakers and can discriminate, there will be no public square to speak of,” Mr. Neilson said.

<em>From <a href="https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/supreme-court-struggles-with-regulation-of-social-media-5594908">The Epoch Times</a></em>

Latest

Science &amp; Tech

Court

Texas

social media

Videos

Florida

01_Lead Story

04_Top Stories

constitution

Latest Clips

Management

Supreme Court

Matthew Vadum is an award-winning investigative journalist.

Matthew Vadum

02_Second Lead

Moody

Paxton

Courts

Latest and breaking news, documentaries, movies, and lifestyle content on NTD+.
 
Empower your knowledge and elevate your spirit with NTD+, your go-to destination for truthful news, insightful documentaries, and captivating lifestyle content that enriches your life.

Supreme Court Struggles With Regulation of Social Media

Baseball’s Free Agency–And Why it Moves Slowly

Ukrainian Tech CEO: 'I'm Grateful for All the Support That America Has Sent'

Former Sheriff Villanueva Suspended From X

Russia Bombards Ukraine With Attack Drones

Gen Z Vote Extremely Important; Young People Want Candidates Who Care About Their Future: Gen Z Conservative Commentator

It's in Haley's Best Political Interest to Endorse Trump: Democratic Strategist

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (Feb. 23)

Trump Private Investigator: New Phone Data Casts Serious Doubt on Fani Willis Relationship

Epoch Times Staff

Iris Tao is NTD's White House correspondent based in Washington. Prior to her work at the White House, Iris reported on U.S. politics and U.S.–China relations from NTD’s New York headquarters. She holds degrees in journalism and economics from Boston University.