Sam Wang is a Washington correspondent for NTD News based in Washington, D.C. Sam covers politics on Capitol Hill, and U.S.-China relations. 

Sam Wang

NTD Plus

News

News with integrity, from the U.S. and around the world. Focused reports and analyses that shed light on major issues the world deserves to know. NTD Evening News airs daily at 6 p.m. ET.

NTD Evening News

Citizens Honor Police for Their Service and Sacrifice

Cary Dunst is the news anchor for NTD Evening News. He is also the co-host of NTD Good Morning.


Cary Dunst

Trump ‘Projecting American Influence and Leadership’ on Iran Issue in Beijing: China Expert

Chris Bob is a reporter for NTD and a host of "Profiles of Service." He is also a small business owner. Chris graduated from Union College with a concentration in politics and religion in Russia and the former Soviet Union.

Chris Bob

Senate Panel Advances Crypto Regulation Bill

Jason Blair is a national correspondent for NTD News based in California. 

Jason Blair

Lawmakers Weigh ‘Sanctuary’ Polices After Woman’s Death in Virginia

Christina Corona is a California-based reporter for NTD News. She primarily covers California news, politics, and entertainment.  

Christina Corona

Bonta Announces Major Fentanyl Bust in California

Arian Pasdar is an international correspondent for NTD News based in South America. His reporting focuses on immigration and key events in Latin America.

Arian Pasdar

CENTCOM Commander Admiral Cooper Praises Trump's Military Actions

David Lam is a national correspondent based in California and a part-time anchor for "NTD Tonight." Before joining NTD he was a financial analyst.

David Lam

Lawyers in OpenAI Trial Give Closing Arguments

Eva Fu is a New York-based writer for The Epoch Times focusing on U.S. politics, U.S.-China relations, religious freedom, and human rights. Contact Eva at eva.fu@epochtimes.com

Eva Fu

Jack Bradley is a Washington correspondent for NTD News based in Washington, D.C. Jack previously anchored "NTD Newsroom" and worked as an assistant producer for the show. 

Jack Bradley

China News

Organ Harvesting in China

Congressional Hearing Spotlights Forced Organ Harvesting in China

Dave Martin is NTD's Senior Sports Reporter and sports analyst. He also hosts "Data Hub" segments during NTD's special election coverage, "The Nation Decides."

Dave Martin

Report: Giants WR Nabers Had 2nd Procedure on Knee

Xavier Becerra Leads New California Governor Poll

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 15)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 14)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 13)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 12)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 11)

Don Ma is an anchor and senior business correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Don is the anchor and producer of NTD's "Business Matters," which airs weekdays at 4:30 pm ET.

Don Ma

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 10)

Arleen Richards is NTD's legal correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers all major legal stories. Arleen holds a Doctor of Law (J.D.).


Arleen Richards

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 9)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 8)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 7)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 6)

NTD Newsroom comprises teams of reporters, editors, and producers assigned to cover breaking news and other stories.


NTD Newsroom

Fast, compelling, first-hand news from China. China in Focus airs Monday–Friday at 8 p.m. ET.

China in Focus

China Sends Warships to Pacific Drill as Tensions With Japan Rise

Reuters is a news agency owned by Thomson Reuters. It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in about 200 locations worldwide writing in 16 languages.

Reuters

We present news that is truthful and based on facts, outside of the political fog. Instead of focusing on the negative things happening around us, our mission is to give our viewers a good morning with empathetic and uplifting stories. Our aim is to provide an antidote to negativity by shining a light on the best side of people. We speak to inspiring people who positively impact communities, pursue topics that represent our common human values, and will never miss an opportunity to bring you heartwarming stories.

NTD Good Morning

2 US Embassy Personnel Assigned to Cartel Case Killed in Car Accident

The Associated Press is an American not-for-profit news agency headquartered in New York City. 

The Associated Press

US News

Gunman Kills 8 Children, Including 7 of His Own, in Louisiana Mass Shooting

Flora Hua is a reporter based at NTD's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers China news, U.S.-China relations, and human rights issues. Flora primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus."  

Flora Hua

Trump: Seized Iranian Ship May Have ‘A Gift From China’

Joseph Lord is a congressional reporter for The Epoch Times.


Joseph Lord

Aldgra Fredly is a freelance writer covering U.S. and Asia Pacific news for The Epoch Times.

Aldgra Fredly

Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani Hospitalized in Critical Condition: Spokesman

Wildfires Across Georgia and Florida Have Destroyed Nearly 50 Homes and Are Forcing Evacuations

News you can trust from the U.S. and around the world. Critical information and insight. We cover the stories that others don’t. NTD News Today airs Monday–Friday at 11 a.m. ET.

NTD News Today

US Warns of China Hacks via Routers, Smart Devices

Juliet Song is an international correspondent exclusively covering China news for NTD. She primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus," covering U.S.-China relations, the Chinese regime's human rights abuses, and domestic unrest inside China.

Juliet Song

2 Americans Among Suspected Communist Rebels Killed in Clashes With Troops, Philippine Officials Say

Ryan Morgan is a reporter for The Epoch Times focusing on military and foreign affairs. He was previously a news writer for NTD. 


Ryan Morgan

Mari Otsu is NTD's White House correspondent based in Washington. 

Mari Otsu

World News

Middle East

Iran

3 US Warships Fend Off Iranian Attacks, Trump Says Ceasefire Still Holds

Health News

3 Dead in Suspected Hantavirus Outbreak on Cruise Ship in Atlantic Ocean: WHO

WASHINGTON—The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Dec. 4 over Tennessee's ban on <span style="font-weight: 400;">gender-altering procedures</span> for minors, teeing up a potentially game-changing decision for precedent on this issue.

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) attorney Chase Strangio and U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar asked the court to remand or send Tennessee's law back to a lower court for reconsideration. Prelogar said the law represented a form of sex-based discrimination that should be scrutinized more heavily under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

Tennessee Solicitor General Matthew Rice told the court that the law didn't create a classification based on sex but instead was focused on the purpose of cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers. The equal protection clause, he said, doesn't require states to "blind themselves to medical reality." He also compared the medical community's acceptance of gender procedures to previous acceptance of eugenics and lobotomies.

During oral argument, multiple justices raised concerns about the evolving nature of debate in this area, as well as the level of scrutiny that courts should apply to laws like Tennessee's. Some justices seemed hesitant about applying the Constitution in the way Prelogar suggested the court should, while others indicated they believed that the law was drawing a line based on sex.

Justice Clarence Thomas asked why the court shouldn't see the law as an age-based classification rather than a sex-based classification. He also asked whether there was a difference between the effects of testosterone on a female versus a male.

Prelogar said that she recognized differences between males and females but suggested the state hadn't substantiated the risk involved in administering cross-sex hormones.

Chief Justice John Roberts seemed skeptical that this case was comparable to other cases and asked whether the justices should view it differently in light of the medical questions involved. Justice Samuel Alito confronted Prelogar about the evidence and a statement she made about the appropriateness of using drugs to address gender dysphoria. He pointed to the UK's decision to restrict prescriptions of puberty blockers.

Prelogar maintained that the drugs could be critical for individuals with "severe gender dysphoria." Strangio told the court that Tennessee had prohibited treatment that relieved suffering, adding that the law failed under any standard of review.

At one point, Alito suggested that Prelogar had "relegated" to a footnote the <a href="https://perma.cc/7XAJ-UCRZ">Cass report,</a> a large-scale review of evidence by a pediatrician who found that there was a lack of quality evidence in this area.

Both Prelogar and Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted that the UK hasn't completely banned the procedures.

Sotomayor said, "The evidence is very clear that there are some children who actually need this treatment," noting the risk of suicide and other adverse consequences for individuals who experience dysphoria.

Rice conflicted with justices over whether the state was using sex to determine the use of procedures. Justice Elena Kagan, for example, told Rice that the medical purpose at issue was "utterly and entirely about sex."

Sotomayor posed the example of a girl coming to a doctor with the intention of preventing herself from growing breasts. In order to address that patient's concerns, Sotomayor said, the doctor would need to know whether the patient was a girl or boy.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh said it seemed to him that the Constitution doesn't take sides on the issue, noting that both the Biden administration and the states that have banned gender-altering procedures for minors had presented "forceful" arguments for and against the procedure.

"The difficulty of the issue is that some people are going to be harmed," he told Strangio.

While speaking to Prelogar, he also expressed concern about "constitutionaliz[ing] this whole area" while referencing adverse symptoms for people who undergo procedures for gender dysphoria—including individuals who change their mind about attempting a transition. Rice also contended that the issue was for policymakers rather than judges to decide.

Prelogar told Kavanaugh that the court could write a "narrow opinion" targeting the drawing of sex-based lines if he was concerned about the court "moving too fast" in this area. She also emphasized the role of informed consent, but warned that denying procedures to minors would allow them to develop physical characteristics consistent with their sex, like a more prominent Adam's apple, "that's hard to reverse."

Tennessee's law <a href="https://casetext.com/statute/tennessee-code/title-68-health-safety-and-environmental-protection/health/chapter-33-health-and-welfare-of-minors/section-68-33-103-prohibitions">prohibits</a> health care providers from performing or administering medical procedures for the purpose of "enabling a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor's sex." Under the umbrella of procedures banned, it includes surgeries as well as the administration of cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers.

A district court blocked the prohibition on cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers but held that the plaintiffs who sued Tennessee didn't have standing to challenge the surgeries aspect. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld Tennessee's law, while stating that it passed constitutional muster under the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause.

Prelogar disagreed with the appeals court's conclusion that the law should be analyzed under a form of scrutiny known as rational basis review, whereby the state has to show a rational basis for having the law. Instead, she said in her petition that the law should be subject to heightened scrutiny.

Part of the oral argument featured discussion about the court's 2020 decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, whereby a majority opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch held that discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the employment context was a form of discrimination based on sex.

During oral argument, Alito questioned whether the court should apply Bostock to this case. Kagan similarly wondered whether the court should view the law as using a sex-based classification. She suggested instead that it should be viewed as imposing a classification based on "transgender status."

Alito also asked Strangio multiple times whether “transgender status” was “immutable.” Immutability, he said, was part of the legal consideration for deciding whether to recognize a classification like that. Strangio instead focused on whether "transgender status" implied a distinguishing characteristic that was subject to review but said the "discordance between a person's birth sex and gender identity" would satisfy an immutability test.

In responding to Kagan, Prelogar defended the idea that the court could view the law as imposing a sex-based classification, stating that the law chose to focus on procedures related to goals inconsistent with an individual's sex. At one point, Prelogar said she thought there was "space" for states to regulate this area of the medical field in a less sweeping way than Tennessee did.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson indicated that she didn’t think the court should focus on the risks and benefits but rather on how the court should characterize the law. She went on to ask about the lines the statute drew based on sex and age.

She also referenced Loving v. Virginia, which held that laws barring interracial marriages were unconstitutional, and suggested a comparison between Tennessee's law and bans on interracial marriage. Tennessee's law, she told Rice, was "doing basically the same thing" as Virginia's prohibition on interracial marriage. She said both were targeting activity that was purportedly inconsistent with aspects of someone's identity.

Sotomayor similarly compared the issue to rights for African Americans and women.

"When you're 1 percent of the population or less, it's very hard to see how the democratic process is going to protect you," she told Rice.

<em>From <a href="https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/supreme-court-justices-skeptical-of-challenge-to-ban-on-gender-procedures-for-minors-5770575">The Epoch Times</a></em>

Latest

Videos

supreme court

medical care

04_Top Stories

Latest Clips

gender

Management

Supreme Court

02_Second Lead

Courts

Sam Dorman is a Washington correspondent covering courts and politics for The Epoch Times. You can follow him on X at @EpochofDorman.

Sam Dorman

Latest and breaking news, documentaries, movies, and lifestyle content on NTD+.
 
Empower your knowledge and elevate your spirit with NTD+, your go-to destination for truthful news, insightful documentaries, and captivating lifestyle content that enriches your life.

Supreme Court Justices Skeptical of Challenge to Ban on Gender Procedures for Minors