Name: Supreme Court's Conservative Justices Critical of SEC's Enforcement Power
Uploaded: 2023-11-30T02:59:56.000Z
Description: The U.S. Supreme Court's conservative justices seemed poised to rein in the power of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to bring enforcement action, in a case that could limit the reach of the administrative state.

NTD Newsroom comprises teams of reporters, editors, and producers assigned to cover breaking news and other stories.


NTD Newsroom

NTD Plus

News

News with integrity, from the U.S. and around the world. Focused reports and analyses that shed light on major issues the world deserves to know. NTD Evening News airs daily at 6 p.m. ET.

NTD Evening News

Drone Strikes Damage High-Rise Building Near Moscow

Mari Otsu is NTD's White House correspondent based in Washington. 

Mari Otsu

Freedom 250 CEO Calls for Faith, Freedom, and Unity Ahead of America’s 250th Anniversary

Thousands March in London for ‘Unite the Kingdom’ Rally

Eric Metaxas: Knowing America’s History Is Key to Preserving Freedom

Citizens Share Hopes and Prayer for America

Chris Beers is an NTD News anchor and political correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Chris co-anchors "NTD News Today" weekdays at 10:00 am ET.

Chris Beers

US Wants Cuba to Stop Hosting America's Enemies: National Security Analyst

Furniture Fair 2026: When Nature Goes Indoors

Analyst Casts Doubts over Trump-Xi Deals, Noting China’s Past Non-Compliance

Travis Gillmore is an avid reader and journalism connoisseur based in California covering finance, politics, the State Capitol, and breaking news for The Epoch Times.

Travis Gillmore

US News

State News

District of Columbia

Thousands Attend ‘Rededicate 250’ Prayer Celebration on National Mall

Ivan has reported for The Epoch Times on a variety of topics since 2011. He currently leads a team covering the Trump administration. He lives in New York City with his wife and daughter.

Ivan Pentchoukov

Troy Myers is a regional reporter based in St. Augustine, Florida. His background includes breaking, criminal justice, and investigative writing for local news, producing on a national morning newscast in Washington, D.C., and working with an award-winning, weekly investigative news program. In his free time, he enjoys spending time with his dog at the beach.

Troy Myers

Politics

2026 Midterm Elections

Sen. Cassidy Loses Louisiana GOP Primary as Trump-Backed Rep. Letlow Advances to Runoff

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 17)

Arleen Richards is NTD's legal correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers all major legal stories. Arleen holds a Doctor of Law (J.D.).


Arleen Richards

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 16)

Cary Dunst is the news anchor for NTD Evening News. He is also the co-host of NTD Good Morning.


Cary Dunst

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 15)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 14)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 13)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 12)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 11)

Don Ma is an anchor and senior business correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Don is the anchor and producer of NTD's "Business Matters," which airs weekdays at 4:30 pm ET.

Don Ma

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 10)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 9)

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (May 8)

Fast, compelling, first-hand news from China. China in Focus airs Monday–Friday at 8 p.m. ET.

China in Focus

China Sends Warships to Pacific Drill as Tensions With Japan Rise

Reuters is a news agency owned by Thomson Reuters. It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in about 200 locations worldwide writing in 16 languages.

Reuters

We present news that is truthful and based on facts, outside of the political fog. Instead of focusing on the negative things happening around us, our mission is to give our viewers a good morning with empathetic and uplifting stories. Our aim is to provide an antidote to negativity by shining a light on the best side of people. We speak to inspiring people who positively impact communities, pursue topics that represent our common human values, and will never miss an opportunity to bring you heartwarming stories.

NTD Good Morning

2 US Embassy Personnel Assigned to Cartel Case Killed in Car Accident

The Associated Press is an American not-for-profit news agency headquartered in New York City. 

The Associated Press

Gunman Kills 8 Children, Including 7 of His Own, in Louisiana Mass Shooting

Flora Hua is a reporter based at NTD's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers China news, U.S.-China relations, and human rights issues. Flora primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus."  

Flora Hua

Trump: Seized Iranian Ship May Have ‘A Gift From China’

Joseph Lord is a congressional reporter for The Epoch Times.


Joseph Lord

Aldgra Fredly is a freelance writer covering U.S. and Asia Pacific news for The Epoch Times.

Aldgra Fredly

Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani Hospitalized in Critical Condition: Spokesman

Wildfires Across Georgia and Florida Have Destroyed Nearly 50 Homes and Are Forcing Evacuations

News you can trust from the U.S. and around the world. Critical information and insight. We cover the stories that others don’t. NTD News Today airs Monday–Friday at 11 a.m. ET.

NTD News Today

US Warns of China Hacks via Routers, Smart Devices

Juliet Song is an international correspondent exclusively covering China news for NTD. She primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus," covering U.S.-China relations, the Chinese regime's human rights abuses, and domestic unrest inside China.

Juliet Song

2 Americans Among Suspected Communist Rebels Killed in Clashes With Troops, Philippine Officials Say

Ryan Morgan is a reporter for The Epoch Times focusing on military and foreign affairs. He was previously a news writer for NTD. 


Ryan Morgan

World News

Middle East

Iran

3 US Warships Fend Off Iranian Attacks, Trump Says Ceasefire Still Holds

Health News

3 Dead in Suspected Hantavirus Outbreak on Cruise Ship in Atlantic Ocean: WHO

The U.S. Supreme Court's conservative justices seemed poised to rein in the power of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to bring enforcement action, in a case that could limit the reach of the administrative state.

During Nov. 29 oral arguments in the case, SEC v. Jarkesy, which involves three big questions about constitutional boundaries for administrative law courts used by federal agencies for enforcement action, the justices' questions seemed to focus overwhelmingly on how those courts tried individuals without a jury.

SEC v. Jarkesy involves a hedge fund manager, George Jarkesy, whom the agency penalized for violating securities fraud law. More specifically, the SEC imposed a civil penalty of $300,000 on Mr. Jarkesy after bringing an administrative proceeding against him. The agency ultimately agreed with the administrative law judge's conclusion that Mr. Jarkesy had violated securities law.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit had ruled that the SEC's use of administrative law courts was unconstitutional not only because they lacked juries but also because Congress improperly delegated its authority to the agency and the administrative law judges were too insulated from accountability.

The Biden administration argued that the Fifth Circuit erred and told the Supreme Court on Nov. 29 that Congress was able to create these types of administrative law courts due to a legal distinction between public and private rights. That distinction, both sides said, hasn't been fully articulated in the law.

Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett both suggested the distinctions that determined whether someone received a jury trial were somewhat irrelevant.

"It does seem odd from a constitutional perspective," Justice Kavanaugh said, "to say that a private suit triggers the Article III right to a federal court and a jury ... but a government suit against you for money is somehow exempt from those Article III and Seventh Amendment and due process requirements simply because the government attaches a different label, the public rights label to it."

Justice Barrett, meanwhile, seemed perplexed as to why the right to a jury would depend on whether the defendant was tried in either an administrative court or one outlined in Article III of the Constitution. Congress allowed the SEC to choose whether it wanted to bring a case in an Article III district court or its own administrative court.

"It seems to me if you have an entitlement to a jury if you're in federal court, I don't understand then how you [don't] have that right, how it can go to an agency," she said.

Justice Samuel Alito similarly asked why a jury trial "simply goes out the window."

"Justice Kavanaugh's question was, what sense does it make to say you have this protection when you're being sued by a private party, whose resources are certainly going to be more limited than the resources of the federal government, but when the same thing happens to you, and the party that's against you is the federal government, well, this right to a jury trial simply goes out the window," Justice Alito said.

Justice Clarence Thomas, who has <a href="https://www.uschamber.com/lawsuits/justice-thomas-and-the-public-private-rights-distinction">written</a> on the public versus private rights distinction, asked Principal Deputy Solicitor General Brian Fletcher at the beginning of the oral argument: "If I don't agree with you that we're talking about public rights here, [and] that private rights are involved, would you then think that it is required that it be adjudicated before an Article III court?"

Justice Sonia Sotomayor eventually pressed Mr. Fletcher to  "go directly to Justice Thomas's question ... He's already written on this issue, and he thinks that a private right is any right that involves property, life, or liberty basically."

While Mr. Fletcher didn't offer a clear definition of public rights, he cited a 1977 case, Atlas Roofing v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, in arguing that "when the federal government, an agency, is enforcing a federal statute in its exercise of its sovereign powers, that's a matter involving public rights."
<h2>Liberal Justices Dismissive in Light of Prior Precedent</h2>
That case was a key part of Mr. Fletcher's argument and seemed to lead Justice Elena Kagan to dismiss Mr. Jarkesy's case. It involved a roofing company challenging citations from the Labor Department and the constitutionality of the administrative proceedings that followed.

"If you look at the question presented and then you read Atlas Roofing, you wonder why this case is here, in other words, that Atlas Roofing simply resolves the issue," she told Mr. Fletcher.

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan stands during a group photograph of the justices at the Supreme Court in Washington on April 23, 2021. (Erin Schaff/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

She made a similar statement to Michael McColloch, who represented Mr. Jarkesy but argued that his position didn't conflict with the Atlas Roofing precedent.

"I have to say," Justice Kagan told Mr. McColloch, "you're sort of describing a case that I don't recognize. Atlas Roofing says numerous times, it could not have been clearer, the Seventh Amendment is no bar to the creation of new rights or to their enforcement outside the regular courts of law."

She added, "I think that just resolves the case."

During their exchange, she noted that "we've never suggested that in a case where Congress has given an agency the power to enforce something and the agency is bringing the charge, if you will, that ... that's settled."

"Well ... it's settled only to the extent no one's brought it up and forced this issue since Atlas Roofing," Mr. McColloch responded.

Justice Kagan said she agreed and prompted laughter by remarking, "Nobody has had the, you know, chutzpah."

Like Justice Kagan, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson told Mr. Fletcher: "I agree that Atlas Roofing resolves this case, but like many of my colleagues, I guess I don't understand your reading of Atlas Roofing as suggesting there's no Seventh Amendment issue at all if the fact-finding function is assigned to the agency."

Justice Jackson instead read that case as saying that the right to a jury was dependent on the type of claim involved in the lawsuit. While the Seventh Amendment required common law claims be tried by a jury, she suggested that Congress had created a new statutory duty that didn't implicate the Seventh Amendment.

The case could have far-reaching implications for the administrative state, which is facing several challenges in the current Supreme Court term.

"The dramatic change that you're proposing in our approach and jurisdiction is going to have consequences across the board," Justice Sotomayor told Mr. McColloch.

She added, "we have a series of other agencies with very big responsibilities, start with the EPA, start with the Commodities Commission, the Postal Service, that can assess penalties for transporting hazardous materials in interstate traffic. All of those agencies will have to -- will have to go to court, correct?"

She further asked whether "all of their proceedings are now nullified under your theory."

Mr. McColloch countered that he didn't think he and his client were "asking for a big change in the law."

His position was that a lawsuit seeking civil penalties should go to an Article III court if the agency's enforcement action had an analog in federal law.

"There are certain things that have been deemed exempt from that under, again, another long strain of cases such as immigration, tax, et cetera ... and Social Security is like the easiest example."

<em>From <a href="https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/supreme-courts-conservative-justices-critical-of-secs-enforcement-power-5538172">The Epoch Times</a></em>

Latest

Videos

supreme court

04_Top Stories

Latest Clips

Supreme Court

Courts

Sam Dorman is a Washington correspondent covering courts and politics for The Epoch Times. You can follow him on X at @EpochofDorman.

Sam Dorman

Latest and breaking news, documentaries, movies, and lifestyle content on NTD+.
 
Empower your knowledge and elevate your spirit with NTD+, your go-to destination for truthful news, insightful documentaries, and captivating lifestyle content that enriches your life.

Supreme Court's Conservative Justices Critical of SEC's Enforcement Power

Jets QB Aaron Rodgers Cleared to Practice

NTD Evening News Full Broadcast (Nov. 29)

Web Staff

Jason Perry is an Army veteran and NTD's National Security Correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Jason primarily covers border security, national defense, foreign wars, and veterans' issues.