UN Urged to Call for Repeal of Marijuana Legalization in Canada

Joan Delaney
By Joan Delaney
October 29Worldshare
UN Urged to Call for Repeal of Marijuana Legalization in Canada
Dr. Kevin Sabet, president of the U.S. chapter of Smart Approaches to Marijuana, speaks at the “anti-celebration” of pot legalization rally in Vancouver on Oct. 17. In the week after rallies in Vancouver and Toronto, signatures on a petition to have cannabis legalization repealed jumped from 18,000 to 51,000. (The Epoch Times)

A petition that has so far reached 51,000 signatures—more than 33,000 of which were gathered in the week after marijuana was legalized on Oct. 17—is calling on the United Nations to urge Canada to repeal the Cannabis Act.

The petition notes that, by legalizing cannabis, Canada is in violation of three international U.N. drug conventions to which it is a signatory, and in light of that, the legislation should be revoked.

The petition signatures will be submitted to the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB), which has expressed concern over Canada’s legalization of cannabis and said it will be discussing the issue at its two-week 123rd session starting on Oct. 30.

“They have issued a press release saying that they are going to be looking at the issue of [legalization] in that meeting, so we’re hoping that they will be able to make a decision—which it is within their purview to do—to bring their concerns to the U.N. General Assembly and to call on the U.N. General Assembly to denounce what Canada has done,” says David Cooke of CitizenGO Canada, the group behind the petition.

“We’re hoping that through a condemnation from the U.N., that that will force the Canadian government to re-evaluate its decision to totally open up cannabis,” Cooke explained. “We’d like to see it revoked, but at a minimum we’d like to see more restrictions put into place.”

In its Oct. 17 release, the INCB said that by moving ahead with the legalization of marijuana, Canada “has contributed to weakening the international legal drug control framework and undermining the rules-based international order.”

“While the Board is concerned about the impact of cannabis legalization in Canada on the international consensus embodied in the three United Nations drug control conventions and the related commitments made by the international community at the special session of the General Assembly in 2016, it is also deeply concerned about the public health impact of these policy choices on the health and welfare of Canadians, particularly youth,” INCB president Viroj Sumyai said.

In a statement issued on June 21, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime said it “regrets the Canadian legislature’s decision to legalize cannabis for non-medical use.”

“Canada has long been an active and constructive partner in multilateral efforts to counter the world drug problem,” the statement said. “However, as agreed by all Member States including Canada, national action to address the world drug problem should be taken in line with the three international drug control treaties, and not external to it.”

The three treaties are the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (1961), the Convention on Psychotropic Substances (1971), and the Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (1988).

At Senate hearings in early May, Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland said that while legalization puts Canada in contravention of “certain obligations related to cannabis under the three U.N. drug conventions,” it would be a mistake to withdraw from the international legal framework.

She said Canada will still be “in line” with the goals of the treaties.

“We do believe our approach is consistent with the overarching goal of the conventions, which is to protect the health and welfare of society,” she said. “Both of those views are ultimately my judgment and the judgment of our government. And I believe they are consistent with advice.”

Conservative foreign affairs critic Peter Kent said in early May that Canada’s international reputation is at stake and the government should pull out of the treaties.

‘Short-sighted thinking’

The treaties class cannabis and its byproducts as a Schedule 1 narcotic and define it as illicit when produced, sold, or used for non-medical purposes.

“It’s a psychotropic drug and it’s classed as a narcotic. It’s put up there on the same schedule as cocaine and opium,” says Cooke, adding that he doesn’t think legalization was a good idea.

“It’s a lot of short-sighted thinking because the health care costs and the policing and social service costs are all going to go up. Any money that the government makes is going to go out to pay for the care of all the people who will be ruining their lives through this.”

He said the speed with which the petition signatures grew since two anti-legalization rallies in Toronto and Vancouver on Oct. 17 means there are many Canadians who share his concerns.

“It’s gone viral,” he said, noting that it jumped from 18,000 signatures to 40,000 signatures the day after the rallies alone. The goal is 100,000 signatures.

“I think a lot of Canadians aren’t even aware of what was really happening in this country and what legalization meant. Now that they’re aware of it, or some of them are aware of it, they’re very concerned.”

Pamela McColl, director of the group Smart Approaches to Marijuana Canada, agrees.

“There is a large constituency of Canadians who are not at all accepting of the legalization of marijuana,” she said. “They do not want more marijuana in their society, and they do not want to be burdened with the costs to health care and other programs.”

From The Epoch Times