White House officials scrambled to roll back comments made by President Joe Biden on May 23, when he said that the United States would defend Taiwan militarily in the event of an invasion by China.
White House staff said that Biden was only reiterating the United States’ policy that it would provide military equipment to Taiwan, not advocating sending troops to defend it.
“As the president said, our policy has not changed,” a White House spokesperson told Jacqui Heinrich of Fox News.
“As the President said, our policy has not changed. He reiterated our One China Policy and our commitment to peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. He also reiterated our commitment under the Taiwan Relations Act to provide Taiwan with the military means to defend itself.”
When Biden, who is currently in Asia promoting his Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, was asked by a reporter whether the United States would militarily defend Taiwan from invasion, he answered simply, “Yes.”
“It’s the commitment we made,” Biden added. “Look, here’s the situation. We agree with a ‘One China Policy’, we signed onto it, and all the attendant agreements made from there. But the idea that [Taiwan] can be taken by force … it’s just not appropriate.”
“It will dislocate the entire region, and be another action similar to what happened in Ukraine. And so it’s a burden that is even stronger.”
The “One China Policy” refers to the United States’ recognition of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) claim that there is only one Chinese government.
It is separate from the CCP’s “One China Principle,” which maintains that the communist regime has historic rights to the whole territory of pre-civil war China, including Taiwan.
The CCP claims that Taiwan is a breakaway province that must be united with the mainland, though Taiwan has been self-governed since 1949 and has never been under CCP control.
Biden’s comments appeared to break with the United States’ longstanding policy of so-called strategic ambiguity, in which it will neither confirm nor deny whether it would come to Taiwan’s aid in the event of a war.
Moreover, the statement is the third time since August that White House officials have refuted the president’s comments regarding Taiwan and claimed that there was no change in policy. The last such incident was in October, when Biden broke with strategic ambiguity and said that the United States had a “commitment” to defend Taiwan.
Taiwan does not have a mutual defense agreement with the United States, but the 1979 Taiwan Relations act does guarantee that the United States will furnish Taiwan with the capabilities necessary to maintain its own defense.
However, many in Congress consider the policy of strategic ambiguity to be fundamentally flawed, and believe that the administration’s failure of ambiguity to deter Russia from invading Ukraine likely means that the policy would also fail to deter the CCP from invading Taiwan.
Numerous experts and former lawmakers went online to criticize the decision to roll back the President’s comments, and called for a more assertive American stance on the issue.
“This is the third time @potus has spoken out in favor of strategic clarity on Taiwan and third time WH staff has tried to walk it back,” said Council on Foreign Relations President Richard Haass in a tweet. “Better to embrace it as new US stance, one that is fully consistent with one-China policy but that alters how US will go about implementing it.”
“Instead of trying to walk back Biden’s comments, the administration should be explaining to the American public why our ‘Strategic Ambiguity’ on Taiwan needs to become more clear and direct,” said former Congressman Will Hurd in another. “We will defend our allies. Full stop.”
From The Epoch Times