China has refused to resume direct military communication with Washington despite repeated efforts from Secretary of State Antony Blinken, the top U.S. diplomat said on June 19 shortly after meeting with the Chinese leader Xi Jinping.
While he “raised repeatedly” the prospect of setting up a crisis communication line between the U.S. and Chinese militaries, “at this moment, China has not agreed to move forward with that,” Blinken told reporters at a press conference as he wrapped up his two-day trip to Beijing.
“I think that’s an issue that we have to keep working on,” he said. “It is very important that we restore those channels. If we agree that we have a responsibility to manage this relationship responsibly, if we agree that it’s in our mutual interests to make sure that the competitive aspects of the relationship don’t veer into conflict, then surely we can agree and see the need for making sure that the channels of communication that we’ve both said are necessary to do that include military-to-military channels.”
As bilateral tensions keep rising, Beijing has resisted a consistent U.S. push to open up lines of communication to mitigate the risk of a potential flare-up. Since 2021, China’s leaders have declined or ignored over a dozen requests to talk with the Pentagon, as well as around 10 working-level engagement invitations from the U.S. side, Reuters reported, citing an unnamed senior U.S. defense official.
That includes in February after a U.S. military jet shot down a Chinese surveillance balloon traversing the U.S. continent.
Chinese defense minister Li Shangfu also refused an invitation for a formal meeting with the U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin at the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum earlier this month.
In his first visit to China as the secretary of state, which also made him the most senior Biden administration official to make such a trip, Blinken held talks with the Chinese foreign minister Qin Gang and Beijing’s highest-ranking diplomat Wang Yi, as well as a brief meeting with Xi.
Asked why Washington would want to continue engaging with China despite the apparent unwillingness to have open military communications from the other side, Blinken argued that such efforts are necessary to make changes happen.
“We’re not going to have success on every issue between us on any given day, but in a whole variety of areas—on the terms that we set for this trip, we have made progress and we are moving forward,” he said without elaborating on the specifics. “But again, I want to emphasize none of this gets solved, resolved with one visit, one trip, one conversation. It’s a process. And my hope and expectation is that we’re more engaged in that.”
Retired United States Air Force brigadier general Robert Spalding, now a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, sees a less rosy picture.
The Chinese regime, he said, is using the military communication channel “as a bargaining chip to get more concessions from the Biden administration,” he told The Epoch Times’ sister outlet NTD.
“We’re the ones that are asking for it, and quite frankly, the only one that’s going to make any kind of military decision is Xi Jinping himself,” he said. With the U.S. side appearing to care about it more than the Chinese, he said, “that becomes a negotiating position for them to basically hold out in order to give concessions for things that are probably more important to our society or our economy.”
At a Monday press briefing, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre described Blinken’s visit as a “good step forward.”
“The meeting was constructive, which is important. Important for Americans’ interest and important for the American people,” she said. “We believe it’s a good step forward for Secretary to happen to have a constructive conversation with President Xi.”
But Spalding believes the United States has “just really lost the ball on what is important with the relationship.”
“China’s trying to strip-mine the U.S. economy, and there’s no indication that we’re actually willing to protect it,” he said. Cutting U.S. supply chain dependence on China, and rebuilding U.S. infrastructure and industrial base, he suggested, should instead be a higher priority in managing the relationship with China.
From The Epoch Times
