Name: Dr. Mehmet Oz: Up to $4 Billion in Health Care Fraud in California
Uploaded: 2026-02-03T23:01:12.000Z
Description: “Minnesota … is just the tip of the iceberg,” says Dr. Mehmet Oz, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

Jan Jekielek is a senior editor with The Epoch Times, host of the show “American Thought Leaders” and co-host of “FALLOUT” with Dr. Robert Malone and “Kash’s Corner” with Kash Patel. Jan’s career has spanned academia, international human rights work, and now for almost two decades, media. He has interviewed nearly a thousand thought leaders on camera, and specializes in long-form discussions challenging the grand narratives of our time. He’s also an award-winning documentary filmmaker, producing “The Unseen Crisis: Vaccine Stories You Were Never Told,” “DeSantis: Florida vs. Lockdowns,” and “Finding Manny.”

Jan Jekielek

NTD Plus

Shows

At a time when our nation is becoming increasingly polarized, media often ignore viewpoints and stories that are worthy of attention. American Thought Leaders, hosted by The Epoch Times Senior Editor Jan Jekielek and his reporting team, features in-depth discussions with important thought leaders on key issues facing America—and Canada, the world—today.

American Thought Leaders

What the End of the Orban Era Means for Hungary and Its Constitution | Marton Sulyok

One Key Fact About America’s Founding That Isn’t Taught Anymore | Eric Metaxas

Is Canada Becoming the CCP’s Backdoor into America? | Former Canadian Intel Analyst Scott McGregor

Bringing you the latest videos, livestreams, and premieres.

Epoch Video

'Killed to Order' LIVE Q&A with New York Times Bestselling Author and Epoch Times Senior Editor Jan Jekielek

Gordon Chang Breaks Down Trump-Xi Summit and What’s Next

How Cartels Force Children Into Prostitution, Drug Dealing and Even Killing | Rosi Orozco

The Charter School Principal Turning Children Toward Plato, Virtue, and the Eternal | Caylan Ford

The CCP’s Greatest Insecurity—and America’s Greatest Weapon | Sam Brownback

Homeopathy Cured Her Disease, Now She’s Fighting for More Access | Paola Brown

Mollie Hemingway: The Untold Story of How One Man ‘Reshaped the Supreme Court’

The Associated Press is an American not-for-profit news agency headquartered in New York City. 

The Associated Press

News

US News

State News

California

More Than 17,000 Under Evacuation Orders as Southern California Wildfire Threatens Homes

Rudy Blalock is a Southern California-based daily news reporter for NTD. Originally from Michigan, he moved to California in 2017 and the sunshine and ocean have kept him here since. In his free time, he may be found underwater scuba diving, on top of a mountain hiking or snowboarding, or at home meditating—which helps fuel his active lifestyle.

Rudy Blalock

40,000 Ordered to Evacuate as Chemical Tank Leaks, Threatens Explosion in California

Video of US Fighter Jet Shooting Down UFO Over Lake Huron Emerges in New Pentagon Files

Mary Man is a writer for NTD. She has traveled around the world covering China, international news, and arts and culture.

Mary Man

Daniel Monaghan is a reporter for NTD News covering culture, social issues, and education. He holds a BA in Political Science and Government.

Daniel Monaghan

China News

Epoch Times Obtains Over 2,000 Unseen Tiananmen Square Photos on 37th Anniversary of the June 4th Massacre

Ryan Morgan is a reporter for The Epoch Times focusing on military and foreign affairs. He was previously a news writer for NTD. 


Ryan Morgan

Mari Otsu is NTD's White House correspondent based in Washington. 

Mari Otsu

World News

Middle East

Iran

3 US Warships Fend Off Iranian Attacks, Trump Says Ceasefire Still Holds

NTD Newsroom comprises teams of reporters, editors, and producers assigned to cover breaking news and other stories.


NTD Newsroom

News you can trust from the U.S. and around the world. Critical information and insight. We cover the stories that others don’t. NTD News Today airs Monday–Friday at 11 a.m. ET.

NTD News Today

US Government Sues Chick-fil-A Over Religious Rights

Sports News

Kyle Busch, Two-Time NASCAR Champion, Dies at 41

Haika Mrema

Medical Plane Crash in New Mexico Mountains Kills 4, Sparks Wildfire

California Mayor Resigns, Will Plead Guilty to Acting as Chinese Agent

Reuters is a news agency owned by Thomson Reuters. It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in about 200 locations worldwide writing in 16 languages.

Reuters

Trump Calls Iran's Response to Latest US Ceasefire Proposal 'Totally Unacceptable'

Why a Taiwan Invasion Would Trigger Trillions in Global Losses | Amb. Alexander Yui

Over 1,000 CCP-Linked Groups in America: Exposing United Front Operations | Peter Mattis

Why 28- and 29-Year-Olds Are Disappearing From China’s Uyghur Concentration Camps | Ethan Gutmann

Texas AG Ken Paxton Breaks Down Wave of Lawsuits Targeting CCP Surveillance

The Many Hidden Fronts of CCP Unrestricted Warfare | Casey Fleming

Has Xi Jinping Unified His Own Enemies? | Robert Suettinger

How the CCP Dehumanizes Christians in China | Pastor Bob Fu

The Failures of Multiculturalism in the United Kingdom | Peter McIlvenna

From AI Girlfriends to Brain Implants, How the AI Revolution Is Radically Reshaping Our World | Wynton Hall

Most Americans Agree: You Can’t Change Your Sex | Jonathan Butcher

The Woke Movement Has Peaked. What’s Next? | Andrew Doyle

Rob Schneider: Here’s What’s Wrong With Our Culture Today

Why These 9 Institutions Must Be Reformed Post-COVID | Jeffrey Tucker

Canning, Compost, and Chickens: How to Stop Relying on Others for Food | Special Episode

Charles Murray: I Thought Religion Was Irrelevant to Me. I Was Wrong.

Robert Kiyosaki: Why America’s Middle Class Keeps Getting Poorer

The CCP’s Gloves Are Off in Trade War—What’s Next? | Lee Smith

How Tariffs Once Paid America’s Bills–And Why They Could Again | John Gardner

Jeffrey Tucker: Everything You Need to Know About the Fed

Impact of Trump’s Trade, Tax, Energy Policies | Mark Skousen

How Clay Clark Helped Small Businesses Survive—and Thrive—During the Pandemic and Beyond

Eric Trump: How America Can Outcompete China in Manufacturing

EJ Antoni Decodes the Trump Economy and the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Controversy

Here’s What Darwinian Evolution Can’t Explain About the Origins of Species | Stephen Meyer

How ‘Brain Rot’ and the Escapist Virtual World Are Harming Our Youth | Adnan Alkhalili

Treating the Root, Not Just the Symptoms: The Power of Integrative Medicine | Dr. Daniel Monti

Exclusive: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya on How the NIH Is Rethinking Autism, DEI, China Ties, and Gain-of-Function

The False Promise of Antidepressants | Dr. Joanna Moncrieff

Why Steak Is at the Top of the New Food Pyramid | Dr. Shawn Baker

A New Approach to Alzheimer’s? | Lou Reese

Dr. Mehmet Oz: Up to $4 Billion in Health Care Fraud in California

The Evidence of Harm: What the Data Really Show About Pediatric Transgender Procedures | Leor Sapir

An Exclusive, Inside Look at Shen Yun Performing Arts | Special Episode

Epoch Cinema

Cinema

A Little Sketchy TV

Breast Milk, McDonald’s, & Garbage | A Little Sketchy

3-Headed Hydra, NSA, & Cringe | A Little Sketchy

Special

Jubilee Celebrations, Valentines Day, & Selling to China | A Little Sketchy

Freedom Convoy, Ukraine, & Winter Olympics | A Little Sketchy TV

Inside ‘Trump 2.0’ and the Media’s Role in Political Violence | Sean Spicer

He Ran the World’s Biggest Payment Processor; Now He’s Taking on Social Security | Frank Bisignano

Devin Nunes on Ending the Politicization of America’s Intelligence Agencies

Exclusive: Inside SBA’s Crack Down on Loan Fraud Nationwide | Administrator Kelly Loeffler

Exclusive: Kash Patel Talks China Fentanyl, Violent Networks, ‘Burn Bags,’ and More

Andy Ngo: I Was Nearly Killed by Antifa. This is What I Learned.

Eric Trump Opens Up About How Relentless Attacks Impacted Him and His Family

Why Charlie Kirk’s Approach Matters Now More Than Ever | Pastor Jackson Lahmeyer

The Battle Over Alligator Alcatraz, the US Census, and CCP Surveillance | Florida AG James Uthmeier

[RUSH TRANSCRIPT BELOW] “Minnesota … is just the tip of the iceberg,” says Dr. Mehmet Oz, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

Minnesota has become the epicenter of several overlapping fraud investigations of childcare programs, small business pandemic loans, and Medicaid services. Earlier this month, Dr. Oz traveled to Minnesota to tour suspected fraud sites and meet with whistleblowers and announced that over $2 billion in annual Medicaid funding might be withheld.

“What we’re seeing in Minnesota, which is billions of dollars of fraud that hurts our most vulnerable people and puts them at risk … is dwarfed by what I saw in California, which is whole-scale cultural malfeasance around health care,” Dr. Oz says.

“The magnitude of fraud there, we believe, is approximating $4 billion just in hospice and home health care,” he says.

Dr. Oz oversees programs that together constitute about one-fourth of the entire U.S. federal budget.

In this episode, he breaks down how the home health care and hospice systems are being exploited on a massive scale and also how Medicare beneficiary numbers are being stolen and weaponized for fraudulent billing schemes.

As the administration approaches its one‑year mark, he reflects on efforts to cut waste, lower drug prices, and transform health in America.

President Donald Trump has recently unveiled his new “Great Healthcare Plan” to lower prices and increase transparency.

“For decades, Americans have been paying three times more than Europeans and other developed nations have been paying for the exact same drugs made in the same facilities,” Dr. Oz says.

Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of  NTD.

RUSH TRANSCRIPT
Jan Jekielek:

Dr. Mehmet Oz, such a pleasure to have you on American Thought Leaders.

Thank you for having me on. We have names that are equally difficult, I think, at times.

Well, let’s start with a very difficult topic, frankly. I saw that you and the Deputy Secretary of HHS [U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services], Jim O’Neill, went to Minnesota to personally look at fraud. And I’m kind of wondering what you actually did there and what you found there. A lot of people are interested.

Mike Stuart joined us as well. He’s the Chief Counsel for Health and Human Services, and the reason we sent three major administration officials out to Minnesota is that we care about programs all over the country, but when we see problems at the scale that’s happening in Minnesota, we want to understand how it happened. How do we get here? And it’s probably worth going back a little bit and understanding what the whole purpose of Medicaid was. It was created with Medicare in 1965. It is the ultimate payer of last resort. It’s the entity that catches you and addresses a moral obligation of government to take care of its most needy citizens.

Now, Hubert Humphrey, who was from Minnesota, a senator whose name adorns the building I work in, the Humphrey building, is famed for having said that it’s the moral obligation of government to take care of those at the dawn of life, our children. And we cover 53 percent of children. Take

care of those at the twilight of life, seniors, especially what we call dual-eligible seniors, which means they’re on Medicare, but they don’t have any money. So they can’t pay the co-pay. So they have Medicaid that helps them as well.

And then, Humphrey said there’s an obligation to take care of those in the shadows. That haunting use of the light metaphor has always caught my attention. Those in the shadows are folks with substance use disorder and emotional problems. People who just have trouble dealing with the complexities of life. So when you’re dealing with that group of individuals, and we probably all know people in our lives that have some of those characteristics, it’s imperative that we’re there to take care of them.

Some of the ways we do that involve providing home and community-based services, which means instead of paying for a hernia operation in a hospital where you know exactly what you’re getting and a bunch of licensed professionals involved in providing it who probably aren’t going to cheat the system as much, and more importantly, you can track what they’re up to, that’s pretty safe money to be spent. You might be spending too much of it. They might be abusing the system. I’m not making implications about the quality of their morals. I’m just pointing out that you can actually count the numbers and be pretty confident you’re getting what you paid for.

But when I’m providing services, I say “I,” because my job at CMS [Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services] is to pay for these programs. We’re the ultimate federal provider of health care in the country. So when we’re paying for these services that are based in your home, the person providing those services is often not a professional. It’s much more difficult to assert that you actually got a service.

For example, if we’re teaching you how to buy or rent an apartment, or how to live in an apartment, or how to be a good neighbor, if we’re providing transportation to the hospital, if we’re engaged in making sure you have food after you’ve had a procedure so that you can get better, these are softer issues. In fact, I often liken it to the things your family would normally do for you. But if the government’s doing it for you because your family can’t or won’t, or something else is going on that limits that, it gets hard to figure out if you actually got the service from someone who’s reputable. That’s where the opportunities for fraud expand, and that’s what we were investigating in Minnesota.

And so I saw that the number expanded. I think it was up from $1.3 billion to $1.8 billion recently, right? And then I saw that you’re actually looking into other states as well. But what did you specifically find on this fact-finding trip?

So we spoke to a bunch of whistleblowers, and we discovered that there has been, for years, a cover-up. Whether it was done at the highest levels of government, I can’t assert that. I don’t know that. But I know culturally you were dissuaded, intimidated, from speaking up about the fact that you thought there was fraud happening. And any time people raised the possibility that, for example, the Somalian subpopulation, who have different cultural mores than the folks who have historically been in Minnesota, might be taking advantage of systems that were built for Minnesota nice people.

And this is what was told to me by people working in the Department of Health and Human Services there, from folks who are police, law enforcement. They were witnessing it, but if they said something, one woman was walked out of the building and censored for a while. She was allowed to come back because they couldn’t discover or at least assert anything that she’d done wrong. But when she came back, she was basically shuttled around. So she could not play a real role in the government anymore after she had raised concerns about what was going on with these home and community-based service monies.

We also learned that these 14 programs that they themselves have acknowledged were problems were so poorly audited. And the reason for that, we spoke to the auditor in the state, is that the people who were supposed to be running these programs didn’t know how to do this audit. They didn’t really know how to keep score. They weren’t comfortable with some of the financial tools you might use to keep track of how money is being spent. Culturally, they weren’t really the kinds of people you want in there.

You need to sort of be like an investigative individual. I trust you somewhat, but I want to verify that you’re telling me the truth. You need to have a desire to do that work. So you have well-meaning people trying to be nice, trying not to ruffle any feathers. If you do ruffle feathers, you get outed. Although you may still have a job there, you don’t get to do anything in that job. And that ostracizing of individuals is quite problematic.

So the systemic nature of it is what stunned me. I didn’t expect it to have been done in such an organized way. But when you see that, and then you deal with the reality of what’s happening in Minnesota right now, which is a complete lack of confidence that the services that were supposed to be provided for the individuals that Hubert Humphrey said were the dawn of life, the twilight of life, living in the shadows. They’re getting services sometimes, not getting them other times.

So the trip to Minnesota recently culminated with a visit to a building called the Griggs Building. This is a building decades old. It was a textile mill. They made linen there. They converted it into an office building, but Jan, you wouldn’t walk into this building. It’s a bad part of town. It’s all boarded-up windows. It looks like a communist office building.

And yet, apparently, there were 400 businesses running out of there in the last couple of years that had generated about $380 million in bills for the federal taxpayer or the state of Minnesota. And these are all social service businesses. So as you start to probe into how this beehive of corruption arose, the question does come up, you know, who owns the building? Like, how did this even come about?

The building owner would not let us go into the building, although I know because there have been search warrants in the past that basically you have a bunch of empty offices with maybe one computer terminal inside of them. You don’t have this bustling community of people trying to do good for other Minnesotans. You know, these are a bunch of folks that were scam artists, we think, taking advantage of a naive system.

And here’s the hard part to fathom. I don’t want everyone to take a deep breath now. Minnesota, which is cold this time of year, is just the tip of the iceberg. I think what we’re seeing in Minnesota, which is billions of dollars of fraud that hurts our most vulnerable people and puts them at risk because you steal not only their money, but you can steal their lives by putting them at risk for bad services provided at the wrong time that actually take away opportunities for others to get treatment.

But what we’re seeing in Minnesota is the tip of the iceberg because it is dwarfed by what I saw in California, which is wholesale cultural malfeasance around healthcare. There is an acceptance that you need to be in the fraud business, especially in Los Angeles. And the magnitude of fraud there, we believe, is approximating $4 billion just in hospice and home health care. And I want to spend a few minutes walking you through what’s really happening there because if it’s reflective of what might happen in other parts of the country or might already be happening elsewhere, it’s very concerning for the core infrastructure of federally funded health care.

There’s this perception that some Americans just don’t get any health care, right? Because it’s a private system.

So Medicare and Medicaid were created in 1965 to make sure we did have a social safety net for health care. Medicare deals with older Americans. Over the age of 65, you pretty much get Medicare. We have a bunch of people younger than 65 who qualify for not common reasons. And then you have a Medicaid program designed for people who are generally beneath 138 percent of the poverty level.

It’s a bizarre number, but it happened to turn out that way from Obamacare. So most states will provide Medicaid to the working poor or the folks who are unable to make ends meet financially. We have other programs as well that we offer for children; for example, the Veterans Administration [VA] offers programs for our vets, but most people can get access to health care if they’re willing to either fill out the paperwork or, for whatever reason, qualify. There’s less than 10 percent of Americans who don’t have health care of one type or another, and we’re continuing to try to make that number even better.

But the system works if people are paid appropriately for doing their jobs. The opportunities to defraud Medicare and Medicaid are huge because the organization I run doles out about $1.75 trillion a year. It’s a lot of money. And the problem is that to defraud it, you basically can arm yourself by getting the beneficiary number of just one of those people over 65 or on Medicaid. If you have an ID number, if we can get that number as a fraudulent group, you can start to build the system inappropriately.

Now, it doesn’t matter if one or two or three people do it, but if tens or hundreds of thousands of numbers are stolen and made available online, now all of a sudden you can weaponize this. And what we witnessed in Minnesota does involve a lot of Somalians. A disproportionate number of Somalians have been indicted in that corruption, but there are folks who are Minnesotans for generations who are probably involved in the culpable as well. They just don’t seem to be at the front of the line as they get accused.

But it’s not just Minnesota, though. In California, you have Russian-Armenian gangs, mafia, who are running a weaponized effort to defraud the U.S. government. In South Florida, we have durable medical equipment [DME] fraud. DMEs are wheelchairs and canes and knee braces. We have more of these durable medical equipment suppliers in South Florida than McDonald’s. Why? Because it’s easier to open one of these businesses than to open a bank account.

And the Cuban government, we believe, and this has been an accusation made by the mayor in Miami, might be involved in some of these efforts. Certainly, Cuban nationals or Cuban immigrants are disproportionately involved in some of this fraud. And we see Russian, Chinese mobsters involved in elder daycare in Philadelphia. We have personal care services in New York that have been run oftentimes by either the Hasidic community or we also believe the Russian mafia.

So there are many groups that are penetrating our health care system to steal money from us who are not native-born Americans, and many of them aren’t U.S. citizens. In fact, when the Department of Justice goes after some of these groups, as I was involved in an announcement earlier this year, in 2025, about a $15 billion Russian mafia sting, most of the perpetrators had escaped back to Russia. They go back to their home countries. So it’s an effort by other countries to take advantage of our health care system.

For that 10 percent that don’t have this official coverage, what happens to them when they have a serious problem?

If you have a serious problem and you go to a hospital in America, the hospital by law has to take care of you, and then we try to settle up afterward. Ideally, you don’t want to have people without health insurance, but often it’s the people who can’t fill out the paperwork, and aren’t registering correctly. Then we have the Affordable Care Act that also is there to bridge people from the poverty level income up to 700 percent historically in that range. They stopped getting it over the last couple of years. But Obamacare was designed to take care of people who are making between one and four times the poverty level. So after that, there was a hope that they’d be able to transition into commercial health insurance.

And it is true that often people from other countries don’t understand why we don’t just socialize at all. I think we have a system that works better because it supports market forces to drive quality care. And I say that because in other countries, they’ll do things that will cap prices. When you cap prices, whether it’s rental income in apartments or you do it for medications or, you know, doctor’s care, you actually pervert the market forces that would normally provide the highest quality care.

And so we see right now in Europe, for example, because of price caps on pharmaceuticals, pharmaceutical companies don’t provide their best new drugs to the Europeans as quickly. It often delays several years. And you actually start to see a difference in survival rates of chronic diseases in Europe compared to the U.S. because of some of those limitations. Now, this is all addressable, and this is part of a larger strategy that the president has for health care.

Well, so this is kind of the obvious question here. Two obvious questions. One is, you know, just hot off the press is the Great American Health Care Plan, right? And the other one is, you know, the marquee sort of policy of this administration, I think, is drug pricing, which kind of sounds to me a bit like a cap, given everything you’re saying. So why don’t you kind of disambiguate that for me, and let’s talk about the Great American Health Care Plan.

So the Great American Health Care Plan has several important pillars. One of them is to make sure that we slash drug prices. And we do that by asking Congress to codify what we have successfully been doing at the President’s request this year, which is to allow most favored nation drug pricing. It’s not a price cap, quite the opposite. So here’s what the deal is.

We’re making the point that for decades, Americans have been paying three times more than Europeans and other developed nations have been paying for the exact same drugs, made in the same facilities. And that’s a problem because America is already underwriting a lot of the development expenses. We pay for the research. We help these drugs get crafted. We provide incentives through NIH [National Institutes of Health] and other sources to make sure that novel research is able to prosper. So we develop these drugs.

Once they’re developed, and maybe we foot the bill for that disproportionately, at least when you buy the drugs for your people, if it’s the same product made in the same factory often in America, it should cost the same in America as it does everywhere else. That’s what the president has been saying. He says, give us most favored nation drug pricing. Whatever the best prices are out there for the developed countries, we should pay that. We shouldn’t pay three times that.

So he said, go to industry and ask them what it takes for this to occur. He said, don’t go in there and say you’re going to take them out of business. Don’t put price caps on there. And also recognize we don’t want to stunt their innovation. We want them to be able to create as many new novel solutions to cure cancer, heart disease, and lots of other conditions as possible.

Now, that’s not a price cap because inherently it’s a negotiation. If the industry doesn’t like it, they can leave. They don’t have to participate. However, that’s not what’s happened. The reality is when you look people in the eyes, like I’m looking at you, Jan, and you say, you have been using a system that’s not fair to the American people.

They will say, yes, we knew one day you’d come knocking. You figured it out. We get it. It’s not sustainable. Let’s figure out a solution so we don’t go into a troubled area financially. We can still innovate. And we’ll gently, over time, move towards the most favored nation drug pricing. These were hard negotiations. It took a while, but the president was adamant that it needed to happen.

The industry recognized that they weren’t getting out of it this time, so they voluntarily agreed to some of the rules that will now govern this process, which means giving our most vulnerable people most favored nation drug pricing immediately. So all the Medicaid patients usually qualify. Make sure that you give some of the best, most important products to Medicare for the seniors at most favored nation drug pricing. Those lower the taxes that we pay, but it also lowers the overall cost of services of these products to that senior population.And then every new product that you release has to be at this new fair value, equal to other countries.

In return, we’re going to do two things. We’re going to give you access to more people so you have a bigger market. And we also want to help you when you negotiate with countries overseas to not let them take advantage of you because just like NATO insists that everyone pay a little extra so America pays less—not, you know, less than everybody else—just pays less so it’s fair. So now we have a NATO system that’s a bit more equally spread those expenses across all the NATO countries because, after all, it’s benefiting them primarily. That makes sense. The same thing’s happening in most favored nations. We’re asking all the countries to even up.

So as an example, we went to the UK ,and Jameson Greer, who’s the United States trade representative, and Secretary Lutnick from Commerce went over there and they pushed hard. They said, guys, you’re not paying a reasonable amount of money for your medications. In America, we’re paying 0.8 percent of our GDP [Gross Domestic Product] for medications. In many parts of Europe, it’s 0.2, 0.3, significantly less—less than half of what we pay per percentage of our GDP. Pay more. Don’t make up cockamamie rules that pretend like you’re actually trying to make the right price happen. You guys are just pushing down prices on purpose.

So they’ve agreed in the UK to pay a bit more. That equalizes prices and brings revenue to the pharma industry. And the best evidence I have that what we’ve done is reasonable is that the market cap, the value of the stocks of the pharmaceutical companies, has not plummeted. In fact, they seem to have gone up a little bit since these negotiations have been consummated. So it gives all of us confidence this is a sustainable process.And we’ve spoken to the leaders of the pharmaceutical industry, and they’re willing to work with Congress to try to figure out a solution.

So this is something that is important for the country. It’s fair. Folks are agreeing with it. Even in the industry, we’re asking Congress to codify it, you know, make it permanent so that it doesn’t go away after this administration is done and we don’t have pharmaceutical companies, you know, running away afterwards saying, you know, the next administration is not strong or we can get away with not doing this anymore. We just want this to be the law of the land so that we’re just fairly treated.

You know, you’re responsible for something like a quarter of American government spending. It’s around $1.5 trillion. So there’s a lot of places where that money kind of is being scooped away. You have to deal with all of this, right?

Let me share with you what I saw in Nevada and California because it’s chilling because it’s not just about lowlifes stealing money. What’s happened in California is a tolerance and acceptance of fraud. Everyone’s involved. It just seemed when I was talking to different folks, again, whistleblowers, community organizations, the U.S. Attorney, it’s so rampant that you don’t even know how to get your arms around it. And it happened for a bunch of reasons. There was a general desire not to offend people. This happened in Somalia with the Somalians in Minnesota. It’s also happening with some of these mafia folks in Southern California.

But they began, they realized that they could pay doctors to move people into hospice. The hospice is designed for the last six months of your life. It means you’re going to die. These hospice programs are created with the most common reason that you’d enter it being cancer. But these days, not everyone with cancer dies, but also you’re putting a lot of people with Alzheimer’s and other conditions in there. So it became a little harder to police whether people are going into hospice. But what happens if 100 percent of the people in hospice survive six months? Nobody dies. And that happens because..

Doesn’t sound like hospice. Doctors are being paid to send people inappropriately to hospice. Now, that’s a problem, Jan, because if you’re put into hospice, you actually give up the rest of your healthcare protection. You no longer get traditional Medicare benefits because you’re in hospice; you’re dying. So we’re not going to pay all these extra expenses for things that aren’t going to benefit you because you’ve decided to pull back.

Voluntarily, you’ve decided that you’re not going to go out there and try to get everything done for you as much as possible to help you live longer. You’ve made peace with the end. People are put on hospice who don’t know it. They don’t realize it. And so now they don’t have access to regular Medicare anymore. So people are dying because they can’t get care because they were falsely tricked into being on hospice. Now, that’s a major concern for me.

But then I began to look into how this could possibly happen. How is it that we’ve gotten seven times more hospice in California over the last several years? Do we have seven times more people dying? What’s going on here? And you begin to realize it’s systemic fraud.

Everyone decided not to do anything about this. We’re not going to look at it. It’s too painful, too difficult. Maybe some groups may benefit financially from not checking into this. The doctors are getting engaged so much in the hospice that it’s beginning to undermine the basic ethos of the healthcare profession. And I’ll tell you one whistleblower story that’ll chill you, and then we should move on to the good news in healthcare because there’s plenty of it.

I was talking to a gentleman who owns five hospice centers. Now, if you own five hospices, you have to ask yourself why. You own five hospices because you’re hiding the ball. You want to have a lot of patients split over a lot of different centers so that we can’t track you as well. He’s building this beautiful mansion, massive house because he’s got a lot of money, because he’s stealing money from these hospice programs.

The plumber comes in and says, you know, I see you’re in the hospice business. I’ve got a little side hustle. I own a hospice business. And the guy who’s the doctor says, really? He says, yes, I’m a plumber, but I got a hospice business. You don’t have to really be a doctor to own hospice. And then the carpenter who’s next to him is building the cabinet says, hey, what do you know? I got a hospice business too. So both of the folks who are doing plumbing and carpentry have side hustle businesses, the contractors in hospice; the guy building the house makes a lot of money.

And so that guy, I started asking him, well, how’d you make all this money? He goes, I go to doctors. I ask, low-life doctors? No, I go to the doctors at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Now, this is an allegation. I can’t prove this, but I don’t know why he’d lie to me. You know, I’m trying to learn, and he’s willing to offer some insights.

He says the doctors at this hospital are willing to send me some patients. And I said, that’s weird, really? They just pay them and they give them? Yes, because the doctor said if I gave him a thousand bucks a month or something, that he’d send me patients. And then I started to do that in other hospitals.

And then I’d ask the doctors to send me the patients from the hospital directly. And they say, oh, no, no. We can’t send you the patients from our hospitals directly because our board members own hospice. And the board members of the hospital want that hospital to send patients to their hospice.

You understand the level of perversion here? We’ve got low-lifes who shouldn’t be in the business, right? And not every doctor finished top of our class, right? A lot of doctors have lost their way. They’re getting paid. They’re paying other doctors. Their accusations are that people with money who are involved in hospitals are also being paid in these unscrupulous endeavors. So there’s a general perversion of the entire healthcare ecosystem.

What kind of numbers of people are we talking about in hospice, out of curiosity?

Thousands and thousands of people are being rolled into these systems. And we’re estimating between hospice and home healthcare because they get related, because the scoundrels are involved, they overlap; they send patients back and forth. By the way, they’re also buying the beneficiary numbers from Medicare patients. There’s a market for that. I’ll pay you a couple of hundred bucks; give me your number. I’ll pretend you’re in hospice. I’ll pretend that you’re in home healthcare, and I’ll bill the government for that. And the accusations are that tens of thousands of people have sold their numbers as well.

But again, we have to validate this with U.S. attorneys working on these issues. But once I dove into it, I began to realize how deep the rot was. But the aggregate, just in LA County, just in LA County, we think is between half to $4 billion. About 10 percent of all of the new billing in home and healthcare in the country, in the entire country, seems to be taking place in LA. So obviously, it’s way out of whack.

When they started to try to rein in some of this corruption in Los Angeles, guess what happened in Nevada, next door? A seven-fold increase in hospice there. It shifted. And now, we’re seeing fraud around hospice and home health care in Arizona. We’re seeing it in Texas. So it’s starting to spread. Just like if you try to crack down on durable medical equipment in South Florida, it spreads north to other states.

And I suspect what’s happening in Minnesota with the Somalians is the tip of the iceberg. We have evidence now that we might be seeing that in other Somalian populations. They talk to each other. Once you figure out that no one’s watching the till, you begin to steal money in other areas. In any case, we are aggressive on this. We are rebuilding the infrastructure that would audit these because it was pretty much gutted in the last administration. And if you’re asking why this would happen, because I think that’s what the viewer right now should be asking themselves: why is it that we are having so much fraud in our social services?

Let me just give you a little insight. By federal law, if I give you Medicaid, if I qualify you for Medicaid, I must also offer you the right to vote by law. So is it possible—this is just political patronage run amok with federal tax dollars—that what we’re really seeing is an effort to enlist people in these social programs, Medicaid, SNAP [Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program], and elsewhere, in order to get you onto the voter rolls? At the same time, I’m giving you something to get you to want to vote for me.

That’s the accusation in Minnesota. It’s the possibility in California, where we actually have the unions being involved in some of these endeavors and lobbying as well. So this might be part of a much larger scheme to change how we elect our officials. And that is very chilling for us to think that you might be using social programs designed to help all Americans who are struggling or who have vulnerabilities and using that as a tool to change who gets elected.

I mean, absolutely astonishing. There’s been a lot of activity, really profound activity, I would say, and some very significant policies. Especially most recently, we’ve got the new dietary guidelines, the flipping of the food pyramid. We’ve got, you know, aligning the vaccine schedule with something closer to what we see in some European countries— a lot fewer shots, you know, basically. But when you look back at this year, I mean, basically, we’re one year in. Where do you see the most consequential changes, aside from starting to look at fraud and abuse?

The most consequential things we’re doing involve the power to convene, pulling together people who normally wouldn’t talk with each other to figure out action steps. And here’s why that’s important. We have three basic ways that we can regulate. And regulate, you know, how you regulate an industry has a philosophical element to that. Am I trying to catch you, like trick you and audit you and find you doing something wrong? Or am I trying to say, hey, listen, your industry is run amok. You’re not helping the American people anymore. We’ve got to fix it. So what do you want to do?

There are two different ways of regulating. I tend to be in the latter category because the president believes the latter category is a wise way to go. And here’s why we have that opportunity. When you have a strong negotiator-in-chief, which the president is, you can say things like, I have the right to pass laws. Laws tend to be hard to predict what they’ll look like. They’re difficult negotiations. They’re usually not exactly what you want, but it’s what we got done because often it has to be bipartisan.

So we have the ability to pass laws that could be difficult for you to deal with. We have rulemaking, which means I can write, as the head of CMS, from now on, here’s how we’re going to pay, and here’s what we’re going to pay and here’s what we’re going to consider acceptable. And I can make those rules. If you don’t like them, you can sue me. They take a while to write. It can last for years if you litigate. Lawfare is widely used to block rulemaking in government. But generally, if we’ve written the right rules the right way, we’ll win. It just will take a while.

And again, by the time the rules take action, sometimes they’re not quite as nimble as you’d like. So they can’t adjust to market forces like the role of AI in healthcare and how technology might change how we offer services. The shortage of healthcare workers might make it so that the rule you wrote five years ago isn’t really applicable now, right? So that’s just the reality of governing. But both of those, writing laws and regulating, could also lead you to give, you know, it could be used as tools, weapons, to force people to the table to negotiate. And by doing that last step, using the power to convene, to pull people together, you can actually get a lot of stuff done.

Latest

Paywall Related

Free for Subscribers

Conversations on current and trending topics.

Health &amp; Science

Latest and breaking news, documentaries, movies, and lifestyle content on NTD+.
 
Empower your knowledge and elevate your spirit with NTD+, your go-to destination for truthful news, insightful documentaries, and captivating lifestyle content that enriches your life.