Name: Future of European Security and Russia-Ukraine Peace Efforts: Latvia Foreign Minister Baiba Braze
Uploaded: 2026-01-06T18:51:32.000Z
Description: Amidst ongoing U.S. efforts to mediate a Russia–Ukraine peace and the release of a new U.S. national security strategy that has sent shockwaves through Europe, I’m sitting down with the foreign minister of Latvia, Baiba Braze, to get her unique perspective.

Jan Jekielek is a senior editor with The Epoch Times, host of the show “American Thought Leaders” and co-host of “FALLOUT” with Dr. Robert Malone and “Kash’s Corner” with Kash Patel. Jan’s career has spanned academia, international human rights work, and now for almost two decades, media. He has interviewed nearly a thousand thought leaders on camera, and specializes in long-form discussions challenging the grand narratives of our time. He’s also an award-winning documentary filmmaker, producing “The Unseen Crisis: Vaccine Stories You Were Never Told,” “DeSantis: Florida vs. Lockdowns,” and “Finding Manny.”

Jan Jekielek

NTD Plus

Shows

At a time when our nation is becoming increasingly polarized, media often ignore viewpoints and stories that are worthy of attention. American Thought Leaders, hosted by The Epoch Times Senior Editor Jan Jekielek and his reporting team, features in-depth discussions with important thought leaders on key issues facing America—and Canada, the world—today.

American Thought Leaders

The CCP Wants to Subjugate Taiwan—She’s Standing in the Way | An Exclusive With Hsiao Bi-Khim

Beijing Wants to Wipe Taiwan Off the Map—This Man Is Making Sure Its People Can Survive | Enoch Wu

How Classical Arts Training Helps Kids Unlock Their Full Potential | Sherry Zhang

How Cartel Mega-Tunnels Move Hundreds of Millions in Narcotics Into America | Sara Carter

Why Women Can’t Find Good Husbands | Timothy Goeglein

The Machinery Behind Modern Mass Manipulation | Jacob Siegel

What the End of the Orban Era Means for Hungary and Its Constitution | Marton Sulyok

One Key Fact About America’s Founding That Isn’t Taught Anymore | Eric Metaxas

Is Canada Becoming the CCP’s Backdoor into America? | Former Canadian Intel Analyst Scott McGregor

Bringing you the latest videos, livestreams, and premieres.

Epoch Video

'Killed to Order' LIVE Q&A with New York Times Bestselling Author and Epoch Times Senior Editor Jan Jekielek

The Associated Press is an American not-for-profit news agency headquartered in New York City. 

The Associated Press

News

World News

Americas

Helicopter With Singer Oliver Tree on Passenger List Collides With Another in Brazil, Killing 6

NTD Newsroom comprises teams of reporters, editors, and producers assigned to cover breaking news and other stories.


NTD Newsroom

News you can trust from the U.S. and around the world. Critical information and insight. We cover the stories that others don’t. NTD News Today airs Monday–Friday at 11 a.m. ET.

NTD News Today

Iran's Football Team Leaves Note of Friendship

Melanie is a reporter and editor covering world news. She has a background in environmental research.

Melanie Sun

US News

State News

California

California Governor, LA Mayor Declare Emergency Over Warehouse Fire

News with integrity, from the United States and around the world. Focused reports and analyses that shed light on major issues the world deserves to know. NTD Evening News airs daily at 6 p.m. ET.

NTD Evening News

Up to 900 Planes Grounded Worldwide Amid Engine Shortage, United CEO Says

Reuters is a news agency owned by Thomson Reuters. It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in about 200 locations worldwide writing in 16 languages.

Reuters

Andrew Thomas is a reporter for NTD News primarily covering business, the economy, and technology. 

Andrew Thomas

Science &amp; Tech

NASA Reverses Evacuation Alert Order for Astronauts Aboard Space Station

Rudy Blalock is a Southern California-based daily news reporter for NTD. Originally from Michigan, he moved to California in 2017 and the sunshine and ocean have kept him here since. In his free time, he may be found underwater scuba diving, on top of a mountain hiking or snowboarding, or at home meditating—which helps fuel his active lifestyle.

Rudy Blalock

8 Dead After B-52 Bomber Crashes at Edwards Air Force Base in California

Ohio

At Least 12 People Shot at Ohio Festival, Search for Suspects Ongoing: Police

Mary Man is a writer for NTD. She has traveled around the world covering China, international news, and arts and culture.

Mary Man

Daniel Monaghan is a reporter for NTD News covering culture, social issues, and education. He holds a BA in Political Science and Government.

Daniel Monaghan

China News

Epoch Times Obtains Over 2,000 Unseen Tiananmen Square Photos on 37th Anniversary of the June 4th Massacre

US Embassy in Israel Issues Travel Alert for Much of Middle East

Los Angeles Warehouse Fire Prompts Shelter-in-Place Orders

Gordon Chang Breaks Down Trump-Xi Summit and What’s Next

The CCP’s Greatest Insecurity—and America’s Greatest Weapon | Sam Brownback

Why a Taiwan Invasion Would Trigger Trillions in Global Losses | Amb. Alexander Yui

Over 1,000 CCP-Linked Groups in America: Exposing United Front Operations | Peter Mattis

Why 28- and 29-Year-Olds Are Disappearing From China’s Uyghur Concentration Camps | Ethan Gutmann

Texas AG Ken Paxton Breaks Down Wave of Lawsuits Targeting CCP Surveillance

The Many Hidden Fronts of CCP Unrestricted Warfare | Casey Fleming

The Charter School Principal Turning Children Toward Plato, Virtue, and the Eternal | Caylan Ford

The Failures of Multiculturalism in the United Kingdom | Peter McIlvenna

From AI Girlfriends to Brain Implants, How the AI Revolution Is Radically Reshaping Our World | Wynton Hall

Most Americans Agree: You Can’t Change Your Sex | Jonathan Butcher

The Woke Movement Has Peaked. What’s Next? | Andrew Doyle

Rob Schneider: Here’s What’s Wrong With Our Culture Today

Why These 9 Institutions Must Be Reformed Post-COVID | Jeffrey Tucker

Robert Kiyosaki: Why America’s Middle Class Keeps Getting Poorer

The CCP’s Gloves Are Off in Trade War—What’s Next? | Lee Smith

How Tariffs Once Paid America’s Bills–And Why They Could Again | John Gardner

Jeffrey Tucker: Everything You Need to Know About the Fed

Impact of Trump’s Trade, Tax, Energy Policies | Mark Skousen

How Clay Clark Helped Small Businesses Survive—and Thrive—During the Pandemic and Beyond

Eric Trump: How America Can Outcompete China in Manufacturing

EJ Antoni Decodes the Trump Economy and the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Controversy

Homeopathy Cured Her Disease, Now She’s Fighting for More Access | Paola Brown

Here’s What Darwinian Evolution Can’t Explain About the Origins of Species | Stephen Meyer

How ‘Brain Rot’ and the Escapist Virtual World Are Harming Our Youth | Adnan Alkhalili

Treating the Root, Not Just the Symptoms: The Power of Integrative Medicine | Dr. Daniel Monti

Exclusive: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya on How the NIH Is Rethinking Autism, DEI, China Ties, and Gain-of-Function

The False Promise of Antidepressants | Dr. Joanna Moncrieff

Why Steak Is at the Top of the New Food Pyramid | Dr. Shawn Baker

A New Approach to Alzheimer’s? | Lou Reese

Dr. Mehmet Oz: Up to $4 Billion in Health Care Fraud in California

The Evidence of Harm: What the Data Really Show About Pediatric Transgender Procedures | Leor Sapir

An Exclusive, Inside Look at Shen Yun Performing Arts | Special Episode

Epoch Cinema

Cinema

A Little Sketchy TV

Breast Milk, McDonald’s, & Garbage | A Little Sketchy

3-Headed Hydra, NSA, & Cringe | A Little Sketchy

Special

Jubilee Celebrations, Valentines Day, & Selling to China | A Little Sketchy

Freedom Convoy, Ukraine, & Winter Olympics | A Little Sketchy TV

Mollie Hemingway: The Untold Story of How One Man ‘Reshaped the Supreme Court’

Inside ‘Trump 2.0’ and the Media’s Role in Political Violence | Sean Spicer

He Ran the World’s Biggest Payment Processor; Now He’s Taking on Social Security | Frank Bisignano

Devin Nunes on Ending the Politicization of America’s Intelligence Agencies

Exclusive: Inside SBA’s Crack Down on Loan Fraud Nationwide | Administrator Kelly Loeffler

Exclusive: Kash Patel Talks China Fentanyl, Violent Networks, ‘Burn Bags,’ and More

Andy Ngo: I Was Nearly Killed by Antifa. This is What I Learned.

Eric Trump Opens Up About How Relentless Attacks Impacted Him and His Family

Why Charlie Kirk’s Approach Matters Now More Than Ever | Pastor Jackson Lahmeyer

The Battle Over Alligator Alcatraz, the US Census, and CCP Surveillance | Florida AG James Uthmeier

[RUSH TRANSCRIPT BELOW] Amidst ongoing U.S. efforts to mediate a Russia–Ukraine peace and the release of a new U.S. national security strategy that has sent shockwaves through Europe, I’m sitting down with the foreign minister of Latvia, Baiba Braze, to get her unique perspective.
Latvia is a small Baltic country bordering Estonia, Lithuania, Belarus, and Russia. In the 1940s, the Soviets occupied Latvia and its neighboring countries—a reality that has made Latvia hyper-vigilant against potential Russian expansionism.

Latvia joined both the EU and NATO in 2004, alongside Lithuania and Estonia.

Latvia is one of the few NATO countries that spends considerably more than 2 percent of its GDP per year on its military.

“We keep reminding [other NATO countries] that it’s possible to do that, and we are showing you as our example. In our case, it’s 5 percent hard defense capabilities,” Braze said.

Latvia is working to reallocate state funding to hit a target of 4.91 percent of GDP in defense spending by 2026 and 5 percent in subsequent years.

In our wide-ranging interview, Braze discusses the Ukraine war, how she sees a potential peace agreement taking shape, and how pressure can be mounted on Russia. She’s traveled four times to Ukraine in the 18 months since her appointment as Latvia’s minister of foreign affairs.

Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of NTD.

RUSH TRANSCRIPT
Jan Jekielek:

Minister Baiba Braze, such a pleasure to have you on American Thought Leaders.

Thank you so much for having me.

Let’s talk about NATO. And let’s talk about the new U.S. national security strategy. I’m going to read something that the Deputy Secretary of State Landau wrote recently. And he said, the U.S. has long failed to address the glaring inconsistency between its relations with NATO and the EU. He’s talking now about his NATO ministerial meeting that he was at. And he says, when these countries wear their NATO hats, they insist that transatlantic cooperation is the cornerstone of our mutual security. But when these countries wear their EU hats, they pursue all sorts of agendas that are utterly adverse to U.S. interests and security. What’s your reaction?

Well, on the national security strategy, I think one needs to look at it as a whole, because, of course, as always on social media commentary and here and there, there are bits and pieces that are taken out and some impression is created that there are some things that are not acceptable for Europeans or this and that. So we actually took a look, and it’s a pretty solid document.

And also, with regard to addressing U.S. concerns, whether that’s with regard to China and the Indo-Pacific, or technology, but also on Europe, clearly recognizing the role of Europe, that Europe needs to take more responsibility, which is what we fully say. When we invest in defense or security, we believe that everybody needs to do that because we depend on each other in the end. But also, with regard to technological advances, simplification of regulation, there’s a whole set of steps that we need to take to be more competitive, to be stronger, to be out there in the world where we want to be.

Because once you look at the overall economic development in the world, we clearly see that Asia is leading in the creation of GDP. And we clearly see that we’ve been squeezed out, whether the U.S. or Europeans, out of certain markets in the Indo-Pacific, in the Western Hemisphere. And that’s not the position where we want to be.

So we believe that we need to work together with the U.S. to make sure that we leverage that in the world. So, with regard to Chris Landau’s comments, I met him last night, and we discussed it a little bit. This sort of Euro-Atlantic partnership is something that is part of the global security architecture. When we look at NATO itself, on one hand, it’s a regional organization in the sense of the UN definition. It’s based on the self-defense clause. But, of course, it’s a transatlantic organization.

The EU, in that respect, is also part of the post-Second World War security architecture de facto, even though it started from the connection of economic interests, you know, to be able to trade certain goods without internal barriers, without internal trade tariffs, and so on and so forth, but it was very much to create that technological and economic base after the destruction of the Second World War. Because whereas the Soviet Union was still able to produce stuff, Europe was so destroyed that there was nothing left. So actually merging the markets, merging the industrial base made a lot of sense. So, in a way, NATO and the EU are interrelated; they’re not opposing each other.

But Secretary Landau is right in that respect, that very often the same countries who sit around the NATO table and the EU table sometimes have different statements, and then when you go to the OSCE [Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe] or certain other organizations, there’s still a third identity. But I guess that is natural, because again, the EU is the organization that has very much prevented EU member states from directly competing with each other, against each other. But pooling the resources to make sure that the internal market is solid, that there is one single market where you can move goods, services, and people within, instead of fighting against each other.

So from that respect, it is indeed a very important sort of entity, I think, for all of us in Europe. That’s why so many countries want to join the EU, even now, starting from Montenegro, Albania, Serbia, Ukraine, and Moldova. So it’s an understandable development. But yes, there is something that Secretary Landau has touched upon that resonates, I think, in all of us.

Well, something that’s interesting is I know that Latvia has actually, you know, stepped up in terms of its, you know, defense spending. That’s something that’s kind of, well, let’s just say it’s not unique, but it’s rare up to now. So that’s interesting. My question is, from the perspective of a smaller country, and maybe I want to talk a little bit about Latvia to introduce Latvia to our audience because they may not be as familiar, from the point of view of a smaller country in Europe, it’s obvious that the EU kind of, it seems obvious like the EU presents a lot of benefits. But from the perspective of these larger countries, does it still present that kind of benefit? I’m curious what you think about that.

Yes, we have been strong on security and defense, basically as long as we exist, because our geographical position is what it is. We border not only Estonia, Lithuania, and Sweden on the west, on the Baltic Sea, but on the east, both Russia and Belarus. So we have a 450-kilometer long border. So investing in our national capacities, capabilities, both defense and also internal security, external borders of EU-NATO. Then regional collaboration, so around the Baltic Sea.

And it’s great that Finland and Sweden joined NATO, because, of course, in defense planning, in practical collaboration terms, that makes a huge difference, a huge difference also for defense plans, NATO’s defense plans. We are very pro-American. I think the Nordic-Baltic region is as pro-American as you would get in Europe. There’s no bigger club of countries working with the U.S.

Maybe Poland is in that a little bit there.

Poland is also on the Baltic Sea.

Yes, that’s right.

So, of course, Poland is in that, then also within the EU. So we bring in the security defense issues within the EU agenda. Because again, we have NATO’s defense plans, NATO’s defense capabilities, and capability targets for each and every country within that. So there are only four EU member states outside of NATO, which are Austria, Malta, Cyprus, and Ireland. So all the rest of us are in NATO.

And, of course, the EU plans for security and defense, whether that’s funding for the defense industrial base, whether those are various projects in the EDF [European Defense Fund], European Defense Industry Program, so on and so forth, they have to support NATO’s defense capability targets because, in the end, we are there to make sure that security and defense are strong because prosperity will not be possible without the first precondition, which is that countries are safe and secure.

So in the Baltics, you’re right. We do what we say or we plan, then we decide and then we do it. And only then do we say it. So, like Poland, we’re doing 5 percent next year, actually already this year is

In terms of defense spending. Just, yes, that’s right.

In terms of defense spending, right. Yes, in terms of defense spending. And very much also working with the U.S. on what needs to be achieved with our U.S. partners. We have long-term defense industry programs where we buy U.S. weapons. They fund a small part of it, and the U.S. gets back about $3 per $1 that they give us as seed money. And now we add on our own.

How does that money, how does that equation work?

There is a specific program called the Baltic Security Initiative and then for military sales which allocates certain resources for the Baltic states to buy U.S. weapons and U.S. capabilities. So it’s like seed money and then you know we do the full procurement whether that’s Blackhawks or HIMARS [M142 High Mobility Rocket System] or naval strike missiles and howitzers and so on and so forth. So U.S. industry gets back three, four times more than is sort of given through those support programs.

This might sound like an obvious question, but why is the military so important to you?

Well, because of deterrence, the approach that we have in NATO is deterrence, but also planning for defense, but deterrence comes first. And deterrence is formed by defense capabilities, political intent, so political will, and strategic communications that you actually also demonstrate certain capabilities and that political will. So in short, it cannot just be achieved through talking; you need actual capabilities. So that’s why and also learning from Russia’s war in Ukraine.

I guess the thing that here in the U.S. a lot of people might not understand is, you know, what that kind of proximity feels like, right? Because the U.S. is separated by big oceans on either side. And also kind of the historical perspective, right, where Latvia came from, you know, after the fall of the Berlin Wall and so forth. Maybe you can kind of flesh that out a little bit for me.

I think all the countries on Russia’s borders, up from Norway to Finland, the Baltic states, Poland, and then down to the Black Sea, are serious about defense. And in our case, we established, like all the countries mentioned, our republics in 1918, 1718. So that was a period of the republics. And we were going strong up until 1940, when Stalin’s Russia, you know, totalitarian, authoritarian Soviet communist regime, associated itself with Nazi Germany.

And in 1939, they concluded a secret pact to divide Europe, which de facto allocated Western Europe to Nazi Germany and Eastern Europe to the Soviets. So that’s how they started the Winter War in Finland. That’s how the Second World War started with the invasion of Poland; that’s the Nazis. That was the partitioning of Poland between the Nazis and the Soviets. In 1940, the Soviets occupied the Baltic states, and then for 50 years they didn’t leave. So it actually required bringing down the Soviet Union to become free again.

And the U.S. was really crucial, like in Poland, like in the Baltic states. The U.S. was the land of the free, the big shining light that was not recognizing the occupation of the Baltic states, not recognizing the USSR’s illegitimate claim for any country in the world. And that kept us going. We had big communities here, both the Polish and the Baltic communities in the U.S., working hard with all the U.S. administrations, not letting them forget. We were active in the United Nations, making sure that the United Nations wouldn’t forget that the Baltic states were the founders of the League of Nations, the predecessor of the United Nations, but were not founders of the UN because the Soviets occupied them.

So then with the reestablishment of independence, and I was a student in the Popular Front, where it was very much again sort of inspired, and we were listening to the reports of Radio Free Europe, an American voice in Latvian, you know, which the Soviets tried to suppress and not let it broadcast. And in the evenings, we could catch it on the shortwave radio. So we always listened to that. And that was a shining light of freedom that inspired us and made sure that we were able to reinstate our independence and regain it and also become successful again. So for us, that sort of security defense importance also relates to freedom, and the U.S. has been an inspiration for us in that respect.

Let’s talk about the Russia-Ukraine war. The president has recently said that he feels like they’re getting close to some kind of peace agreement. The peace agreement is contentious. Some people think that Russia shouldn’t be allowed to keep any Ukrainian territory. Others believe that getting peace is of paramount importance. And so it’s unclear how much to give. I’m curious where Latvia stands on this point.

So I was appointed at the end of April 2024. So I’ve been in office for one and a half years, and I’ve been to Ukraine four times, two times to Kyiv, once to Lviv and to Odessa on the Black Sea. And on this last trip last week, I also went to Chernihiv, which is close to the front, about 60 kilometers from the front. And I speak everywhere, not only to the officials but also to the soldiers, to the private sector, to people, you know, in the shops and elsewhere. And nowhere have I felt that they want capitulation or that they are ready to give up territories or something.

At the same time, obviously, we also are realists in various quarters and realize that to achieve a ceasefire, you need to freeze the front at a certain point. On one hand, Ukrainians have their will and agency, and I don’t think they will accept something that is imposed on them. So they have to own that peace and ceasefire. And I think the red line for them would be sort of recognizing the legitimacy of the occupied territories as being Russian. I think that is one thing: to seize the front and to say, okay, those are Russian-occupied territories.

And the other part is actually recognizing the incorporation into Russia. I think that’s a big, big sort of difference. But again, it’s a Ukrainian decision. We will support Ukrainian choices from our side. We know they want peace. That’s for sure. They want peace. And they have fought really hard for it. Russia was trying to get through this war, which they couldn’t achieve somehow.

Because remember, before 2014, they tried to stop the European ambitions of Ukrainians. The whole Maidan sort of revolution started from the fact that corrupt President Yanukovych refused to sign an association agreement with the EU. That was not about membership. It was an association agreement. So people rose up and said, listen, this is not acceptable. We want to have a European future.

And then the Russians invaded for the first time in 2014, illegally occupying and annexing Crimea, started the war in the eastern part of Ukraine, but they have not been able to break down the Ukrainian nation’s will to have a sovereign democratic state and to be a legitimate member of the EU and also NATO. Actually, when the Russians first invaded in 2014, Ukraine didn’t want to be a member of NATO. It was officially a neutral country.

And so, you know, they have achieved the strengthening of Ukrainian sort of sovereignty, democracy, and institutions, which then leads me to think that for Ukraine to own that peace, it will have an effect on all European security because the only country that doesn’t want peace, what we see, is Russia, because all the instruments of power.

In NATO, we always analyze the instruments of power that a country has. It has a military instrument of power. It has a political instrument of power, economic, you know, private sector instrument of power, religion, media, and so on and so forth. We don’t see a single instrument of power in Russia that would be oriented towards peace. It’s all about war.

How do you measure that? That’s very interesting.

Well, when you look, for example, at the military instrument of power, it’s actively employed to try to crush Ukrainian self-defense and not even achieve its objectives, because like this year they have occupied below 1 percent of Ukrainian territory. And they have lost around 280,000 soldiers this year alone. Altogether, 1.2 million soldiers lost and severely wounded in Russia.

But they are continuing. There is no indication that they want to stop the bombings, nightly missile attacks, you know, trying to advance on the front. So very clear, the military instrument of power is fully employed to continue the war. The economic instrument of power is the same thing. Military production is prioritized over any civilian economy.

So the civilian sector is cannibalized, prioritizing resources, prioritizing production, labor, machinery, tools, and so on and so forth. Which means that together with the restrictive measures that the U.S., Europe, and others have imposed on Russia to stop the war, it’s leaving the Russian economy in tatters because military production is not a productive economy. It doesn’t create growth of GDP.

Well, unless you keep at war, I suppose, for the time being.

That sort of produces stuff that is then eliminated on the battlefield. But it’s not a productive economy.

It doesn’t stick around.

No. And it doesn’t create GDP growth per se. It pays salaries and so on and so forth, but that’s not the economy like, you know, companies that we have, you know, that produce either stuff or services or exports and so on and so forth. And then, religion is part of the authoritarian regimes’ tools to control society. There is no free media, there is no social media, including X, Facebook, and Instagram; anything is banned in Russia.

You need to use a VPN or whatever, which is also prohibited, actually, to post anything. So, they use closed Telegram groups to, you know, sort of communicate and so on. So there are a couple of Russian networks, but those are also controlled. So you go through one by one, and you clearly see they are all oriented towards the war.

And that’s why when, yes, we fully support the U.S. efforts to achieve peace, and we are the staunchest supporters of President Trump in that effort. But in our calculation, it’s the pressure on Russia that needs to be increased for them to feel more pain to actually come to the table seriously. And so we admire the resilience of the negotiators. They’ve sat down for three days, four days, doing round after round.

And it’s good that things are not leaked, that it’s sort of kept in the negotiation circle. And it’s not easy. It’s not easy either for Ukrainians or the U.S. But to be successful, we need that pressure on Russia. That is what will achieve the peace deal.

And there’s sort of here, there’s different viewpoints about Russia’s intentions, right? In Poland, for example, it’s actually, you know, there’s a lot of political differences between the political parties, for example. But they both believe, from the people I’ve spoken to, that if it doesn’t go well with Ukraine, they might be next. What does Latvia think about that?

Well, first of all, in any peace deal, the important part is the Ukrainian ability to ensure their future self-defense, so that there is a sufficient Ukrainian self-defense force at a certain level with certain capabilities to provide deterrence for Ukraine. And it’s the same for everyone in the Euro-Atlantic zone because I agree with certain assessments that say that Russia cannot stop the military production, and again it’s a sort of authoritarian regime where there are no internal checks and balances, which will continue its existence in the way as it is, and that continues posing a threat to all of us, to all the democratic countries.

You feel it’s inherently expansionist; it will try. They have shown in the past that indeed, instead of internally doing reforms to be successful. Economy, a force for good globally, which it could be, to have a competitive sort of structure, positive agenda; unfortunately, it has been the opposite. And so having no illusions about that is, in our view, the best recipe to be safe and secure.

Having said that, for now, none of the NATO states, from Norway to Finland to the Baltics and further south, have direct military threats. Because one thing that we did collectively in NATO after 2014 was to work on a new military strategy, to be open-eyed and recognize that what Russia did in Ukraine, in Crimea, and in the eastern part of Ukraine is a big turning point. So NATO’s new military strategy, adopted in 2019, provides for the need not only to conduct out-of-area operations like we did in Afghanistan, where we had a choice to send 500 troops for half a year or not, or to send 130 troops to KFOR or not. But to turn to collective defense, to make sure that both territories and populations are defended. And that is a completely different type of work that was done.

So what we did was to really combine the civil-military intelligence capabilities with NATO to make sure that information and intel are shared, but also that tech capabilities increased, space capabilities, and that gives you that early warning ability to monitor and understand what is happening. And then also changing the whole defense planning, developing those defense plans where you have the forces that you need, the enablements that you need, rapid reinforcement, authorities for commanders, and the presence on the ground where you need.So that all is a deterrent to make sure that we are safe and secure.

And that is a basis, again, for having successful economies, because if security and safety are threatened, the prosperity, the future hopes of all of us will not be there. And that has worked. That has worked. So, yes, a strong force for Ukraine for self-defense and deterrence, but also Ukraine is a successful democratic country with strong institutions, a lively democracy, sovereignty, independence, and it has a perspective—a European perspective. It has a NATO perspective once political conditions are there. And yes, I think we are okay in Europe. But the leadership of the US is something that, of course, we all highly appreciate, whether it’s in the peace process or in defense spending and reform of NATO collaboration.

Well, one of the arguments that I’ve heard, which was compelling, is that the Trump administration is very keen to try to foster peace in Europe, peace in the Middle East, so that it can focus on the real threat, which is communist China. What do you think?

Yes, the U.S. assessment has been there for a while. I mean, we know that well. Officially, in the NATO strategic concept, the official threat is Russia for Euro-Atlantic security and Allied security, and China is a challenge whose behavior and whose lack of transparency on nuclear and conventional capabilities, of course, presents a challenge to us all. But also what we have seen—the assertive behavior in the region, certain types of exercising, certain types of threatening behavior to the neighbors in the sea and so on and so forth—has presented valid questions.

And also the funding, of course, of Russia by purchasing a lot of the oil, a big chunk of the oil.

Absolutely. You’re totally right on that. And also the no-limits partnership between Russia and China was, you know, whatever issues covered there. So quite clearly, we understand that for the US, it is a big strategic issue. And I think working closely within various organizations between the EU and the US to try to also see what economic tools can be used, how we can sort of work together, not to let ourselves be squeezed out from the markets that I mentioned earlier, but we also have other partners in the Indo-Pacific who are as bothered by all this behavior as we are.

Notably Japan recently.

Latest

Paywall Related

Free for Subscribers

Conversations on current and trending topics.

Latest and breaking news, documentaries, movies, and lifestyle content on NTD+.
 
Empower your knowledge and elevate your spirit with NTD+, your go-to destination for truthful news, insightful documentaries, and captivating lifestyle content that enriches your life.