Name: Supreme Court Strikes Down Race-Based Admissions at Colleges
Uploaded: 2023-06-29T23:08:48.000Z
Description: The Supreme Court struck down on June 29 the use of racially discriminatory admissions policies at U.S. colleges.

NTD Newsroom comprises teams of reporters, editors, and producers assigned to cover breaking news and other stories.


NTD Newsroom

NTD Plus

News

News you can trust from the U.S. and around the world. Critical information and insight. We cover the stories that others don’t. NTD News Today airs Monday–Friday at 11 a.m. ET.

NTD News Today

Pentagon Scraps Deployment of 4,000 Troops to Poland

9/11 Memorial and Museum Adds 7th Moment of Silence

AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon Launch Joint Venture to Tackle Dead Zones

Stefania Cox is an NTD News anchor and national correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Stefania anchors "NTD Newsroom," and co-anchors "NTD News Today" weekdays at 10:00 am ET.

Stefania Cox

Trump Committed to US Defense, Prosperity, Amid China Talks: Expert

Jerome Powell Ends Tenure as Fed Chair

US Government Sues Chick-fil-A Over Religious Rights

California Gubernatorial Candidates Make Closing Pitches to Voters 

House Passes 1st Fiscal Year 2027 Appropriations Bill

Jason Blair is a national correspondent for NTD News based in California. 

Jason Blair

Federal Judge Partly Blocks Texas Immigration Law

Trump Announces National Garden of American Heroes Plans

NTD News Today Full Broadcast (May 15)

Paul Greaney is an NTD news anchor and producer. Since joining the company in 2018, he has anchored the station’s flagship Evening News broadcast, launched the NTD Business show, and produced documentary reports on pointed issues. 

The highlight of Paul’s time in the field was his coverage of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests in 2019.

Paul Greaney

NTD News Today Full Broadcast (May 14)

Kevin Hogan is an NTD News data reporter and national correspondent based at the network's global headquarters in New York City. Kevin covers breaking news, as well as U.S. and global current events. He conveys the news through data visualizations and investigates pressing issues.

Kevin Hogan

NTD News Today Full Broadcast (May 13)

NTD News Today Full Broadcast (May 12)

NTD News Today Full Broadcast (May 11)

NTD News Today Full Broadcast (May 8)

NTD News Today Full Broadcast (May 7)

NTD News Today Full Broadcast (May 6)

NTD News Today Full Broadcast (May 5)

NTD News Today Full Broadcast (May 4)

Fast, compelling, first-hand news from China. China in Focus airs Monday–Friday at 8 p.m. ET.

China in Focus

China Sends Warships to Pacific Drill as Tensions With Japan Rise

Reuters is a news agency owned by Thomson Reuters. It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in about 200 locations worldwide writing in 16 languages.

Reuters

We present news that is truthful and based on facts, outside of the political fog. Instead of focusing on the negative things happening around us, our mission is to give our viewers a good morning with empathetic and uplifting stories. Our aim is to provide an antidote to negativity by shining a light on the best side of people. We speak to inspiring people who positively impact communities, pursue topics that represent our common human values, and will never miss an opportunity to bring you heartwarming stories.

NTD Good Morning

2 US Embassy Personnel Assigned to Cartel Case Killed in Car Accident

The Associated Press is an American not-for-profit news agency headquartered in New York City. 

The Associated Press

US News

Gunman Kills 8 Children, Including 7 of His Own, in Louisiana Mass Shooting

Flora Hua is a reporter based at NTD's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers China news, U.S.-China relations, and human rights issues. Flora primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus."  

Flora Hua

Trump: Seized Iranian Ship May Have ‘A Gift From China’

Joseph Lord is a congressional reporter for The Epoch Times.


Joseph Lord

Aldgra Fredly is a freelance writer covering U.S. and Asia Pacific news for The Epoch Times.

Aldgra Fredly

Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani Hospitalized in Critical Condition: Spokesman

Wildfires Across Georgia and Florida Have Destroyed Nearly 50 Homes and Are Forcing Evacuations

US Warns of China Hacks via Routers, Smart Devices

Juliet Song is an international correspondent exclusively covering China news for NTD. She primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus," covering U.S.-China relations, the Chinese regime's human rights abuses, and domestic unrest inside China.

Juliet Song

2 Americans Among Suspected Communist Rebels Killed in Clashes With Troops, Philippine Officials Say

Ryan Morgan is a reporter for The Epoch Times focusing on military and foreign affairs. He was previously a news writer for NTD. 


Ryan Morgan

Mari Otsu is NTD's White House correspondent based in Washington. 

Mari Otsu

World News

Middle East

Iran

3 US Warships Fend Off Iranian Attacks, Trump Says Ceasefire Still Holds

Health News

3 Dead in Suspected Hantavirus Outbreak on Cruise Ship in Atlantic Ocean: WHO

The Supreme Court struck down on June 29 the use of racially discriminatory admissions policies at U.S. colleges.

The 6–3 decision ends the use of so-called affirmative action in higher education, a longtime goal of conservatives.

The ruling will be felt immediately as a million high school students begin applying for fall acceptance at the nation’s colleges and universities. Students may reportedly avoid stating their race or ethnicity in the Common App, which many use to apply to multiple schools at once.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote (<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_hgdj.pdf">pdf</a>) for the court that, for too long, universities have “concluded, wrongly, that the touchstone of an individual’s identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned but the color of their skin."

"Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice," he wrote.

In a footnote, Roberts <a href="https://www.theepochtimes.com/military-academies-can-still-consider-race-in-admissions-supreme-court_5364103.html">carved out</a> an exception in the ruling for military academies.

Because military academies didn't participate in the case and “none of the courts below addressed the propriety of race-based admissions systems in that context,” the new decision applies only to civilian educational institutions of higher learning, he wrote, noting that there may also be “potentially distinct” and “compelling” interests here related to national security.

This appears to mean that the court could in the future consider the use of affirmative action in admissions at military academies.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, writing that the majority decision “rolls back decades of precedent and momentous progress.”

“It holds that race can no longer be used in a limited way in college admissions to achieve such critical benefits,” the justice wrote.

“In so holding, the Court cements a superficial rule of colorblindness as a constitutional principle in an endemically segregated society where race has always mattered and continues to matter.”

The case is actually two separate appeals that were heard together on Oct. 31, 2022: Students for Fair Admissions Inc. (SFFA) v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, court file 20-1199, and SFFA v. University of North Carolina (UNC), court file 21-707.

Roberts wrote the majority opinion in the UNC case, which was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Samuel Alito, and Amy Coney Barrett. The court’s three liberal justices—Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson <a href="https://www.theepochtimes.com/3-supreme-court-justices-dissent-in-major-affirmative-action-ruling_5364007.html">dissented</a>. This means the vote was 6–3.

The justices’ votes in the Harvard case were the same except that Jackson didn't participate in that decision after she recused herself because she has close ties to Harvard. Kagan didn't recuse herself even though she had been dean of Harvard Law School from 2003 to 2009. The vote in this case was 6–2.

SFFA calls itself “a nonprofit membership group of more than 20,000 students, parents, and others, who believe that racial classifications and preferences in college admissions are unfair, unnecessary, and unconstitutional.”

Harvard and UNC are, respectively, the oldest private college and the oldest public college in the United States.

In the Harvard case, U.S. District Judge Allison Dale Burroughs, who was appointed by then-President Barack Obama, previously found after a 15-day nonjury trial for Harvard, ruling that its admission policy that was said to discriminate against Asian American applicants wasn't motivated by “racial animus ... or intentional discrimination” and was “narrowly tailored to achieve diversity and the academic benefits that flow from diversity.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit upheld the lower court’s decision, ruling against SFFA.

In the UNC case, U.S. District Judge Loretta Copeland Biggs, also an Obama appointee, previously held an eight-day nonjury trial to determine if UNC was complying with existing precedent.

The court approved the school’s admissions policy because it uses race “flexibly as a ‘plus’ factor” and only as “one among many factors.”

It found that UNC had no viable race-neutral alternatives to help it “achieve the educational benefits of diversity about as well as its current race-conscious policies and practices.”

The court stated that providing admissions preferences based on socioeconomic status instead of race wouldn't work because “the majority of low-income students are white,” so the schools would just “be choosing more white students.”

Race should be used by UNC indefinitely because it's “interwoven in every aspect of the lived experience,” according to the court.

Until the United States one day resolves its “struggle with racial inequality,” minority students will continue to be “less likely to be admitted in meaningful numbers on [race-neutral] criteria,” it stated.

SFFA went to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, but before it could rule on the case, the SFFA also sought review from the Supreme Court, which was granted.

In the majority opinion, Roberts wrote that the Harvard and UNC admissions programs “cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause.”

“Both programs lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives warranting the use of race, unavoidably employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful endpoints," he wrote. "We have never permitted admissions programs to work in that way, and we will not do so today.”

Years earlier, then-Justice Sandra Day O’Connor had predicted the demise of affirmative action.

In Grutter v. Bollinger, she wrote: “We expect that 25 years from now the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today.”

Making race-conscious admissions decisions is “dangerous,” O’Connor wrote, calling it a “deviation from the norm of equal treatment.”

Such programs must “be limited in time,” she said, noting that “all governmental use of race must have a logical end point.”

While race can't be used as a factor in admissions decisions, this doesn’t mean that college applicants have to refrain during the process from discussing race, the new opinion states.

“Nothing in this opinion should be construed as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration or otherwise,” Roberts wrote.

“A benefit to a student who overcame racial discrimination, for example, must be tied to that student’s courage and determination. Or a benefit to a student whose heritage or culture motivated him or her to assume a leadership role or attain a particular goal must be tied to that student’s unique ability to contribute to the university.

“In other words, the student must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual—not on the basis of race.”

Thomas—the nation’s second black Supreme Court justice after Thurgood Marshall, who left the court in 1991 and died in 1993—who has long pressed to end affirmative action, wrote a 58-page opinion concurring with the majority.

The new ruling “sees the universities’ admissions policies for what they are: rudderless, race-based preferences designed to ensure a particular racial mix in their entering classes.”

Jackson, the first black female justice on the Supreme Court, wrote in a separate, 29-page dissenting opinion in the UNC case that the majority opinion is “truly a tragedy for us all.”

“With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces ‘colorblindness for all’ by legal fiat. But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life,” Jackson wrote.

“And having so detached itself from this country’s actual past and present experiences, the Court has now been lured into interfering with the crucial work that UNC and other institutions of higher learning are doing to solve America’s real-world problems.”

Sotomayor and Kagan joined Jackson’s dissent.

Both schools stated that they were disappointed in the majority opinion.

“Carolina remains firmly committed to bringing together talented students with different perspectives and life experiences and continues to make an affordable, high-quality education accessible to the people of North Carolina and beyond," UNC Chancellor Kevin Guskiewicz said in a statement.

"While not the outcome we hoped for, we will carefully review the Supreme Court's decision and take any steps necessary to comply with the law.”

Harvard stated that it continues to support diversity.

“We write today to reaffirm the fundamental principle that deep and transformative teaching, learning, and research depend upon a community comprising people of many backgrounds, perspectives, and lived experiences. That principle is as true and important today as it was yesterday,” the school said in a statement.

Three U.S. presidents, past and present, weighed in on the ruling.

President Joe Biden expressed dismay at the new majority decision, saying that “this is not a normal court.”

“I strongly disagree with the Court’s decision because affirmative action is so misunderstood," he said. "Many people wrongly believe that affirmative action allows unqualified students to be admitted ahead of qualified students. This is not how college admissions work.”

Former President Donald Trump said that “this is a great day for America.”

“People with extraordinary ability and everything else necessary for success, including future greatness for our country, are finally being rewarded,” he said.

Former President Barack Obama lamented the ruling, saying affirmative action helped him and his wife.

“Like any policy, affirmative action wasn’t perfect. But it allowed generations of students like Michelle and me to prove we belonged," he said.

"Now it’s up to all of us to give young people the opportunities they deserve — and help students everywhere benefit from new perspectives.”

Zachary Stieber, Emel Akan, and Janice Hisle contributed to this report.

From <a href="https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-strikes-down-affirmative-action-policies-at-us-colleges_5363356.html">The Epoch Times</a>

Latest

Videos

supreme court

Breaking News

01_Lead Story

04_Top Stories

Latest Clips

Management

affirmative action

Supreme Court

Matthew Vadum is an award-winning investigative journalist.

Matthew Vadum

Iris Tao is NTD's White House correspondent based in Washington. Prior to her work at the White House, Iris reported on U.S. politics and U.S.–China relations from NTD’s New York headquarters. She holds degrees in journalism and economics from Boston University.

Iris Tao

02_Second Lead

Courts

Latest and breaking news, documentaries, movies, and lifestyle content on NTD+.
 
Empower your knowledge and elevate your spirit with NTD+, your go-to destination for truthful news, insightful documentaries, and captivating lifestyle content that enriches your life.