Matthew Vadum

The U.S. Court of International Trade had ruled that the tariffs were not allowed under the Trade Act.

The court held that the tariffs were not allowed under the Trade Act.

The state argues the high court’s recent ruling on race and redistricting required it to adjust its electoral map.

The court found that the tariffs were not allowed under a 1974 trade law.

The ruling came after Louisiana delayed May 16 primary elections to give it time to replace the unconstitutional map the court struck down last week.

Lower courts issued contradictory rulings on whether doctors’ free speech rights were violated by the state policy.

A federal district court had ordered that a second black-majority congressional district be created in the state after finding black voters underrepresented.

Thousands of lawsuits alleging that people were harmed by Roundup are pending across the country.

The U.S. Court of International Trade had ruled that the tariffs were not allowed under the Trade Act.

The court held that the tariffs were not allowed under the Trade Act.

The state argues the high court’s recent ruling on race and redistricting required it to adjust its electoral map.

The court found that the tariffs were not allowed under a 1974 trade law.

The ruling came after Louisiana delayed May 16 primary elections to give it time to replace the unconstitutional map the court struck down last week.

Lower courts issued contradictory rulings on whether doctors’ free speech rights were violated by the state policy.

A federal district court had ordered that a second black-majority congressional district be created in the state after finding black voters underrepresented.

Thousands of lawsuits alleging that people were harmed by Roundup are pending across the country.