California is set to become the first state in the nation to impose strict rules on pet stores regarding retail sales of live dogs, cats, and rabbits.
AB 485, which goes into effect on Jan. 1, will only allow pet stores to sell animals obtained from animal rescue or shelter groups.
These groups include public animal control agencies or shelters, humane society shelters, shelters with the society for the prevention of cruelty to animals, or rescue groups that are in a cooperative agreement with at least one private or public shelter.
The San Diego Humane Society, which will now be required to help monitor and make sure local pet stores follow the new rules, told NBC that it had yet to been contacted by any local retail pet stores enquiring about obtaining any dogs, cats, or rabbits from the shelter.
But even if they are contacted by a pet store, Steve MacKinnon, Vice President for Community Response at the San Diego Humane Society, told NBC that he wasn’t sure they would partner with a store as the society has their own in-house adoption program.
If found in breach, pet store operators will be liable for a $500 fine for each animal sold in violation of AB 485 and be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Law Hailed, Some Criticism
The law was hailed when it was signed in late 2017 by a range of groups.
“This landmark law breaks the puppy mill supply chain that pushes puppies into California pet stores and has allowed unscrupulous breeders to profit from abusive practices,” Matt Bershadker, President and CEO of the ASPCA, said in a statement at the time.
“Californians recognize that pet stores enable the work of puppy mills, which cause suffering for dogs and heartbreak for consumers,” added Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO of The Humane Society of the United States. “We are grateful to Governor Brown for putting his stamp of approval on a state policy to dry up funding for this inhumane industry.”
According to proponents of the law, stores often claim to source from licensed, humane, or small-scale breeders but are, in fact, often sourcing knowingly or unknowingly from puppy and kitten mills, where animals are kept in squalid conditions.
“By cutting off the puppy mill pipeline that moves cruelly bred animals from across the country into California pet stores, A.B. 485 will also help prevent California consumers from being duped into purchases that contribute to unconscionable animal ‘production’ and suffering,” Berdshadker said after the bill was passed.
Others have a different take on the new law.
Phil Guidry of the American Kennel Club called the new law part of the campaign of “anti-breeder animal rights extremists,” saying the campaigners ultimately seek to outright ban all animal breeding and ownership.
He said that people behind the regulation push consistently use inflammatory accusations to target all breeders, calling them “puppy mills,” knowing full well that most purebred dog enthusiasts represent a group that has a different approach to professional breeders that focus on providing purpose-bred dogs that will match the lifestyle of the consumer.
“When governments attempt to limit the legitimate sources from which a person may obtain a pet, it not only interferes with individual freedoms, it also increases the likelihood that a person will obtain a pet that is not a good match for their lifestyle and the likelihood that that animal will end up in a shelter,” he said.
