A federal appeals court on Monday rejected a bid by President Joe Biden's administration to end the recently-restarted Trump era "Remain in Mexico" program.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an order from District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, a Trump nominee, finding that the administration erred in ending the program, which forces some asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for their claims to be heard.
Kacsmaryk ruled in September that Biden nominee Alejandro Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary, violated federal law when attempting to end the program in part by ignoring its benefits.
The government then informed the appeals court that the ongoing case was moot because of the announcement.
A three-judge panel on the court did not agree.
The Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) proposed approach "is as unlawful as it is illogical," he added.
Oldham also took the government to task for suggesting no court can review the decision to end the program.
"DHS claims the power to implement a massive policy reversal—affecting billions of dollars and countless people—simply by typing out a new Word document and posting it on the internet. No input from Congress, no ordinary rulemaking procedures, and no judicial review. We address and reject each of the Government’s reviewability arguments and determine that DHS has come nowhere close to shouldering its heavy burden to show that it can make law in a vacuum," he said.
The ruling means the Biden administration must keep "Remain in Mexico" in place while the case, brought by the states of Texas and Missouri, continues.
The panel also consisted of Circuit Judges Rhesa Barksdale, a George H. W. Bush nominee, and Kurt Engelhardtand, a Trump nominee.
The White House, the Department of Justice, and DHS did not respond to requests for comment.