Name: Why the Iran War Is All About China | Zineb Riboua
Uploaded: 2026-03-06T19:51:02.000Z
Description: “The U.S. went to war in Iran because Iran made itself a Chinese weapon,” argues policy analyst Zineb Riboua, a research fellow at Hudson Institute’s Center for Peace and Security in the Middle East.

Jan Jekielek is a senior editor with The Epoch Times, host of the show “American Thought Leaders” and co-host of “FALLOUT” with Dr. Robert Malone and “Kash’s Corner” with Kash Patel. Jan’s career has spanned academia, international human rights work, and now for almost two decades, media. He has interviewed nearly a thousand thought leaders on camera, and specializes in long-form discussions challenging the grand narratives of our time. He’s also an award-winning documentary filmmaker, producing “The Unseen Crisis: Vaccine Stories You Were Never Told,” “DeSantis: Florida vs. Lockdowns,” and “Finding Manny.”

Jan Jekielek

NTD Plus

Shows

At a time when our nation is becoming increasingly polarized, media often ignore viewpoints and stories that are worthy of attention. American Thought Leaders, hosted by The Epoch Times Senior Editor Jan Jekielek and his reporting team, features in-depth discussions with important thought leaders on key issues facing America—and Canada, the world—today.

American Thought Leaders

The CCP’s Greatest Insecurity—and America’s Greatest Weapon | Sam Brownback

Homeopathy Cured Her Disease, Now She’s Fighting for More Access | Paola Brown

Mollie Hemingway: The Untold Story of How One Man ‘Reshaped the Supreme Court’

Why a Taiwan Invasion Would Trigger Trillions in Global Losses | Amb. Alexander Yui

Inside ‘Trump 2.0’ and the Media’s Role in Political Violence | Sean Spicer

Over 1,000 CCP-Linked Groups in America: Exposing United Front Operations | Peter Mattis

Sen. Ron Johnson: Here’s What We Found in 11 Million Pages of COVID Records

Here’s What Darwinian Evolution Can’t Explain About the Origins of Species | Stephen Meyer

Why 28- and 29-Year-Olds Are Disappearing From China’s Uyghur Concentration Camps | Ethan Gutmann

The Failures of Multiculturalism in the United Kingdom | Peter McIlvenna

NTD Newsroom comprises teams of reporters, editors, and producers assigned to cover breaking news and other stories.


NTD Newsroom

News

Fast, compelling, first-hand news from China. China in Focus airs Monday–Friday at 8 p.m. ET.

China in Focus

China Sends Warships to Pacific Drill as Tensions With Japan Rise

Reuters is a news agency owned by Thomson Reuters. It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in about 200 locations worldwide writing in 16 languages.

Reuters

We present news that is truthful and based on facts, outside of the political fog. Instead of focusing on the negative things happening around us, our mission is to give our viewers a good morning with empathetic and uplifting stories. Our aim is to provide an antidote to negativity by shining a light on the best side of people. We speak to inspiring people who positively impact communities, pursue topics that represent our common human values, and will never miss an opportunity to bring you heartwarming stories.

NTD Good Morning

2 US Embassy Personnel Assigned to Cartel Case Killed in Car Accident

The Associated Press is an American not-for-profit news agency headquartered in New York City. 

The Associated Press

US News

Gunman Kills 8 Children, Including 7 of His Own, in Louisiana Mass Shooting

Flora Hua is a reporter based at NTD's global headquarters in New York City, where she covers China news, U.S.-China relations, and human rights issues. Flora primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus."  

Flora Hua

Trump: Seized Iranian Ship May Have ‘A Gift From China’

Joseph Lord is a congressional reporter for The Epoch Times.


Joseph Lord

Aldgra Fredly is a freelance writer covering U.S. and Asia Pacific news for The Epoch Times.

Aldgra Fredly

Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani Hospitalized in Critical Condition: Spokesman

Wildfires Across Georgia and Florida Have Destroyed Nearly 50 Homes and Are Forcing Evacuations

News you can trust from the U.S. and around the world. Critical information and insight. We cover the stories that others don’t. NTD News Today airs Monday–Friday at 11 a.m. ET.

NTD News Today

US Warns of China Hacks via Routers, Smart Devices

Juliet Song is an international correspondent exclusively covering China news for NTD. She primarily contributes to NTD's "China in Focus," covering U.S.-China relations, the Chinese regime's human rights abuses, and domestic unrest inside China.

Juliet Song

2 Americans Among Suspected Communist Rebels Killed in Clashes With Troops, Philippine Officials Say

Ryan Morgan is a reporter for The Epoch Times focusing on military and foreign affairs. He was previously a news writer for NTD. 


Ryan Morgan

Mari Otsu is NTD's White House correspondent based in Washington. 

Mari Otsu

World News

Middle East

Iran

3 US Warships Fend Off Iranian Attacks, Trump Says Ceasefire Still Holds

Health News

3 Dead in Suspected Hantavirus Outbreak on Cruise Ship in Atlantic Ocean: WHO

Texas AG Ken Paxton Breaks Down Wave of Lawsuits Targeting CCP Surveillance

The Many Hidden Fronts of CCP Unrestricted Warfare | Casey Fleming

Has Xi Jinping Unified His Own Enemies? | Robert Suettinger

How the CCP Dehumanizes Christians in China | Pastor Bob Fu

Why the Iran War Is All About China | Zineb Riboua

From Iran to Venezuela—How Trump Is Neutralizing Beijing’s Allies | Gordon Chang

From AI Girlfriends to Brain Implants, How the AI Revolution Is Radically Reshaping Our World | Wynton Hall

Most Americans Agree: You Can’t Change Your Sex | Jonathan Butcher

The Woke Movement Has Peaked. What’s Next? | Andrew Doyle

Rob Schneider: Here’s What’s Wrong With Our Culture Today

Why These 9 Institutions Must Be Reformed Post-COVID | Jeffrey Tucker

Canning, Compost, and Chickens: How to Stop Relying on Others for Food | Special Episode

Charles Murray: I Thought Religion Was Irrelevant to Me. I Was Wrong.

‘We’re at an Inflection Point’: What’s Next for America? | Robert George

Smartphones Are Rewiring Our Brains—Here’s How Parents Can Say No | Clare Morell

Robert Kiyosaki: Why America’s Middle Class Keeps Getting Poorer

The CCP’s Gloves Are Off in Trade War—What’s Next? | Lee Smith

How Tariffs Once Paid America’s Bills–And Why They Could Again | John Gardner

Jeffrey Tucker: Everything You Need to Know About the Fed

Impact of Trump’s Trade, Tax, Energy Policies | Mark Skousen

How Clay Clark Helped Small Businesses Survive—and Thrive—During the Pandemic and Beyond

Eric Trump: How America Can Outcompete China in Manufacturing

EJ Antoni Decodes the Trump Economy and the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Controversy

How ‘Brain Rot’ and the Escapist Virtual World Are Harming Our Youth | Adnan Alkhalili

Treating the Root, Not Just the Symptoms: The Power of Integrative Medicine | Dr. Daniel Monti

Exclusive: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya on How the NIH Is Rethinking Autism, DEI, China Ties, and Gain-of-Function

The False Promise of Antidepressants | Dr. Joanna Moncrieff

Why Steak Is at the Top of the New Food Pyramid | Dr. Shawn Baker

A New Approach to Alzheimer’s? | Lou Reese

Dr. Mehmet Oz: Up to $4 Billion in Health Care Fraud in California

The Evidence of Harm: What the Data Really Show About Pediatric Transgender Procedures | Leor Sapir

An Exclusive, Inside Look at Shen Yun Performing Arts | Special Episode

Epoch Cinema

Cinema

A Little Sketchy TV

Breast Milk, McDonald’s, & Garbage | A Little Sketchy

3-Headed Hydra, NSA, & Cringe | A Little Sketchy

Special

Jubilee Celebrations, Valentines Day, & Selling to China | A Little Sketchy

Freedom Convoy, Ukraine, & Winter Olympics | A Little Sketchy TV

He Ran the World’s Biggest Payment Processor; Now He’s Taking on Social Security | Frank Bisignano

Devin Nunes on Ending the Politicization of America’s Intelligence Agencies

Exclusive: Inside SBA’s Crack Down on Loan Fraud Nationwide | Administrator Kelly Loeffler

Exclusive: Kash Patel Talks China Fentanyl, Violent Networks, ‘Burn Bags,’ and More

Andy Ngo: I Was Nearly Killed by Antifa. This is What I Learned.

Eric Trump Opens Up About How Relentless Attacks Impacted Him and His Family

Why Charlie Kirk’s Approach Matters Now More Than Ever | Pastor Jackson Lahmeyer

The Battle Over Alligator Alcatraz, the US Census, and CCP Surveillance | Florida AG James Uthmeier

[RUSH TRANSCRIPT BELOW] “The U.S. went to war in Iran because Iran made itself a Chinese weapon,” argues policy analyst Zineb Riboua, a research fellow at Hudson Institute’s Center for Peace and Security in the Middle East.

Riboua is the founder of the “China in MENA Project,” which tracks communist Chinese expansion and influence across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).

Is there a bigger dimension to the Iran war that people are missing?

“We have this tendency to just look at the countries involved … but there’s a big player, and the big player here is China,” she says. “China has been investing immensely in the region in the last two decades, in courting, in coordinating, in cooperating with Gulf countries, with Iran itself, and also with its proxies.”

And why, I ask her, has China been so keen on gaining strategic influence over the Middle East?

It’s because the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) understands that “China cannot rise without having the United States weakened in one of the most important regions in the world,” she said.

“Iran has been that tool. China has built Iran’s military arsenal. It has collaborated extensively with Iran’s proxies, especially the Houthis.

“And reversing that calculus is what Operation Epic Fury is doing.”

In our interview, we delve deep into the symbiotic relationship between the two countries—why China needs Iran and why Iran needs China:
<ul>
 	<li>Which role does Iran play on China’s geopolitical chessboard?</li>
 	<li>Why did China turn Iran into one of its strategic allies, and how did the Islamic Republic benefit?</li>
 	<li>How dependent is the Iranian regime on China’s military support and surveillance infrastructure?</li>
 	<li>How dependent is China on Iran’s oil?</li>
</ul>
The goal of America’s military operation, Riboua believes, is to dismantle the whole structure of the Islamic Republic. “The United States is destroying … every single launcher, every single missile facility. Their whole Navy has been absolutely crushed. … It’s 2,000 targets so far, and they’re hitting even more.”

We also discuss what the Chinese regime will do if the Islamic Republic disappears.

How will its geopolitical strategy be impacted? What will happen to the CCP’s Belt and Road initiative, in which Iran played a central role? And how will China’s economy and its relationships with its Middle Eastern and North African proxies be affected?

Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of NTD.

RUSH TRANSCRIPT
Jan Jekielek:

Zineb Riboua, such a pleasure to have you on American Thought Leaders.

Thank you very much for having me. It’s a real pleasure and a great honor. I’m a big fan of The Epoch Times.

Well, I happen to have our national edition hot off the presses as we’re filming today, and of course, the front page here, you know, we’re going, we’ll show it to our audience. There it is. It’s really all about Iran, the Iran war, but also China fits into it, and this is something you jumped on basically immediately, right? We have here, China seriously misjudged the situation in Iran, sources say, how Operation Epic Fury unfolded. I love the paper. You know, this goes to a million people weekly, so please subscribe if you’re a newspaper reader.

Here is what your article, which caught my eye immediately and got me to get you to come in here, said. You said the Iran question is all about China; why Operation Epic Fury is the opening act of the Indo-Pacific century. And so, you know, this spoke to a lot of things that I happen to believe in my own analysis. But you did it in such a deep way. Explain to me what you mean here.

I think that what I meant was that whenever the United States uses its power, whenever it is involved in a region or another, whether it’s Latin America or the Middle East, the consequences of that involvement go beyond the region itself. Whenever there is an articulation of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, I think we have this tendency to just look at the countries involved and who is saying what, and it’s usually Middle Eastern countries. But there’s a big player, and the big player here is China.

China has been investing in the last two decades immensely in coordinating, in cooperating with Gulf countries, with Iran itself, and also with its proxies. And so I thought that what the Trump administration is doing is a total break, first of all, with other administrations when it comes to directly tackling Iran and its ballistic missiles, its nuclear program. A nuclear program is not just a military aspect, but there’s also a political aspect to it. And I think that this means not just tackling the Islamic Republic, but also tackling its sponsor, which is China.

So another headline that really caught my eye, this was in The Free Press, this was Haviv Rettig Gur, right? His line was, this isn’t Israel’s war, which is one of the popular narratives out there from what I’m seeing. It’s America’s. The U.S. went to war in Iran because Iran made itself a Chinese weapon. What’s he saying?

His piece is really great, and I completely agree with his assessment; I think it’s the perfect depiction of it. Basically, the Israelis have been fighting since October 7th against Iran’s proxies, against Hamas, against Hezbollah, against the Houthis, and against many others across the Middle East, but also Africa. And so it has always been this discussion about Israeli national security and Israeli involvement.

But behind all of that involvement, as I said, there’s also the sponsor of it, which is China. So obviously, from a U.S. perspective, as I discussed, being involved does not just mean helping an ally. It means reshaping the configuration of a Middle East that has been, for a very long time, I think, a Chinese chessboard.

He says that it’s really, you know, Israel is at war with Iran, but it’s the U.S.—this war, this is the U.S. being actually at war with China.

In a sense, I would say so, because it is China that has helped Iran acquire different components. Their fingerprints are all over Iran’s military arsenal. When it comes to the missiles, I did some numbers, and it’s been basically the Chinese helping Iran get a lot of the chemical components that are very crucial for that arsenal. Iran does not really have the domestic capacity to produce these chemicals because of the orientation of its industry, which is very heavy on petrochemicals. And also, they don’t have the skills and mastery of it. And so the Chinese really just stepped in and helped.

There’s one thing that I thought was very interesting, and I’ve been looking at that since, I would say, 2020, and it’s the Chinese eagerness to export its surveillance model, its technology model. There were already a lot of scandals about Chinese 5G in Gulf countries. For example, how the UAE [United Arab Emirates] chose 5G over American weaponry and American jet fighters. But this also applies to Iran.

If one looks at it, China has helped Iran’s whole telecommunications architecture. They have reshaped it exactly as they would do in Beijing. A lot of those crackdowns that happened in January against the protesters happened in such brutality because Iran was able to use Chinese technology that was absolutely sophisticated, but also made in a way that they could track very easily who wears a hijab or not, who is doing this or that, because they perfected it in Uyghur camps. And I think that there is this digital GPS aspect that is very important.

You know, you’re just reminding me, I’m going to comment here a little bit. There’s a case in front of the Supreme Court right now. It’s a case called Cisco v. Doe. It’s been running for about 15 years. And the allegation in the case is that Cisco basically built the prototype for China of what’s called the Golden Shield Project, which is this comprehensive system now that you’re basically describing. On one hand, it’s surveillance. On another hand, it’s censorship. The social credit system fits in there.

But the other part is the persecution aspect. All this is integrated into one system. And I’ve been asking myself, as I’ve been looking at these documents recently, how much of this Golden Shield, a lot of people don’t understand this deeply integrated system that’s being used to persecute the Uyghurs and the Falun Gong practitioners and, you know, house Christians increasingly in China, that, in a sense, they probably just white-labeled it, basically, for the Iranian regime with, of course, control mechanisms on their end, right?

Yes, that’s exactly what they did. First of all, it’s a great business, right? You have access to an immense market, 90 million people. You get to track them. You get to make your systems much more sophisticated, and you get to export that system under the premise that, okay, you are saving the Islamic Republic, I mean, you as China, and the world is watching that. African states are watching that. They have a huge regime stability issue. They are desperate as well to maintain power. And the Chinese were able to sell that as basically a winning argument as to why doing business with China has immense gains. I think that all of that is really vanishing today.

Well, this is fascinating, right? Because yet, you know, this is, Iran is really kind of the strategic fulcrum for Beijing in the Middle East, isn’t it? I mean, they’ve spent an insane amount of blood and treasure. Well, blood, not so much blood, I guess, but treasure to build this. But they’re not actually, it doesn’t seem like they’re particularly good allies right now.

Yes, even in terms of their diplomatic engagement, there was one Chinese citizen reported killed, and 300, I think, Chinese citizens also evacuated. And they have not really been that eager to engage even in diplomacy to say, hey, we can help deal with Iran or other things. Their foreign ministry, I think, said that it’s a clear violation of sovereignty, but they’re not supporting in any major way. In fact, a lot of their own technology has been proven to just not be that good.

It’s a huge embarrassment when you are trying to depict yourself as a competitor to the United States.  And it’s even more interesting in the sense that there was this 25-year cooperation, and I think it happened in 2020, and they pledged to invest $400 billion, and they invested quite a bit. Not the whole total, but it was a discussion, and they’ve been very involved.

The other part here is that Iran is very, very important when you’re planning to invade Taiwan for two main reasons. The first one is that Iran is absolutely key when it comes to sanctions evasion. Xi Jinping looked at Putin as the exact guide of what the things you should not do as a leader are. One of them is that you should make sure that you have a plan B and a plan so that you don’t get suffocated by Western sanctions. You can see the state of the Russian economy.

The Chinese, therefore, have been building this parallel system with Iran through border agreements and other arrangements, making sure they bypass a lot of Western financial channels. They are making sure that Iran can still survive with or without those channels. The Chinese were just perfecting that type of system, and they were very proud of it to the point where it became one of their talking points about this being the start of a non-Western world. This is why they talk about the global South, even though it doesn’t mean much, but they’ve been selling that.

The second reason why Iran is so important for China is that, as you’ve seen, for example, with the Red Sea, how the Houthis were able to do this huge blockade that is costing US allies, but also Europeans, thousands and thousands of dollars every single day. The United States needed to get involved. They were not really successful, and they were really, really stuck. That’s exactly what would help China in case of an invasion.

You want to make sure that you’re able to distract the United States. You want to be able to, first of all, make sure that US allies do not trust the United States’ involvement militarily when it comes to securing their interests. You want to make sure that the Houthis, who have been provided a lot of targeting data from Chinese companies, as has been reported by Reuters, are playing their role in opening another front. I think that closing those fronts is absolutely key for what I envision as the Indo-Pacific century.

But just to be clear, right, you’re basically saying the Houthis are just a proxy for Iran. That’s how it plays out.

Yes, they’re absolutely a proxy for Iran and also, more and more, for China, because actually what happened after the Hezbollah pager attacks made it very clear that the Islamic Republic is not capable of rescuing its own major partner. A lot of the proxies were watching that. The Houthis started thinking about whether the Islamic Republic was even their friend. There was a huge debate at the time, and I think the Chinese stepped in. They do provide them a lot of weapons and support. In fact, I found that 35 percent of the indirect Houthi arms originate from China.

That’s remarkable. So why is the Islamic regime firing on, like, just this morning on Turkey? I mean, it’s sort of the most vocal, I think the most vocal response in support of Iran came from Turkey, from Erdogan, perhaps. I don’t know. I haven’t followed all of them, but they’re firing on all sorts of people that they might be hoping would be an ally at some point. I don’t understand it.

Yes, they are. They are disparate measures for a disparate regime during disparate times.

But like, what are they trying to accomplish? Are these things misfiring? I just don’t understand it.

Quite honestly, I think that their chain of command has been just completely dismantled. They don’t know what they’re doing. And this is not an understatement. It’s an understatement to say that they don’t know what they’re doing in the sense that a lot of key commanders have already been killed during the 12-day war. They thought that they had it totally under control, so they did a restructuring, but it seems that that restructuring made them more vulnerable. The key commanders were killed in the first hundred hours of the conflict, and so I think that they generally are really desperate. They also are trying to basically trigger a response where other U.S. allies say, you know, you should stop hitting Iran. They’re hitting us.

But what is happening is that everyone is watching them become weaker and weaker. And so the logic reverses itself. Precisely because the Islamic Republic is weaker, we need to just finish it. They’ve been a threat to everyone, every single neighbor they have. Every single neighbor they’ve had a conflict of some sort with. So I think that this is basically what I think is going on.

On Turkey’s side, I mean, they always are playing a double game, a balancing act, because they don’t know how it’s going. They want to make sure that whatever happens, they do benefit from it. And it’s a very logical way to behave as a power. And also, Turkey is a great power. They command one of the largest militaries in NATO. And so I think that now the calculus is really for Turkey to take advantage of whatever openings the fall of this regime will offer.

Tell me a little bit about shipping insurance, because this has been kind of a popular topic on the talk shows recently, because I think not a lot of us realize how extremely important it is for the flow of oil or goods or whatever it is. And if that insurance leaves, ships aren’t doing their thing anymore, which is astonishing. And, you know, of course, President Trump has made some guarantees of, you know, U.S. protection to get that insurance back. Just like explain to me that system briefly, how it works.

Unfortunately, I’m not really an expert on the question, but what I can tell you is that the Trump administration is working very hard to ensure that it regains its total dominance in maritime navigation. And the shock is very hard, obviously, on a lot of producers, a lot of shipments, a lot of businesses, a lot of U.S. companies, and non-U.S. companies. And so I think that here it’s really about providing a signal that this is a very temporary shock. And I don’t think they would have said that if it wasn’t the case.

And so I think that, I mean, the Trump administration basically said, Trump himself said that, you know, they’re looking at four or five weeks, a little bit more, but that’s the timeline. And with the pace of the operation, it just tells you how it’s unfolding very, very fast. I think faster than any other U.S. engagement ever. And so I think that they are looking at that from the perspective of really reassuring the market. I can tell you precisely about the insurance, but this is how I look at it from a geopolitical perspective.

Right. Well, and one thing I found really interesting, there’s a lot of… I remember President Trump was saying to the Iranian people, help is coming, right? And a lot of people sort of made fun of that, as I remember. It seems to me like the president is showing himself to be highly consequential in his statements, which I think has also kind of a profound geopolitical impact, and I’m curious if

you have thoughts on that. I think that he, you know, I have been saying since December that Khamenei was over. The moment I saw the protests, I realized that he made a huge mistake. He, you know, there is a cost when you lose a war. Khamenei lost the war last year during the 12-day war? There’s a consequence to that. There is a social aspect, a political aspect, but also a power aspect to it in the sense that he was always able to delay negotiations, to make a mockery out of U.S. presence in the region.

He even started making tweets, I think his team was, of Trump being this maniac, psychopath leader, comparing him to some pharaohs and others. And I think that Trump was just being very patient, waiting for the proper timing for all the military assets to move and to make sure that this operation unfolds rather quickly, but also in a good manner. And I think that he was not joking when he said help is on the way in the sense that, first of all, this military operation is dismantling the whole structure of the Islamic Republic. And it has different components to it.

There is the IRGC [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps], there is the Basij, there is the Guardian Council, and other structures. The Islamic Republic is very sophisticated when it comes to its governance, and they are doing a decapitation strategy, going one after the other and making sure that whoever replaces them, if he is obviously hostile to the United States, does not want to cooperate gets killed, and it has been the line.

That in itself provides reassurance to Iranians that when they go and protest or ask their family members who are officers, who are part of the belief that when they defect, they will not be killed or that the loyalists will come back because all of them will have been killed and eliminated. And so I think this is how I’ve been looking at it. And the other aspect is that this is a very different regime change. This is not typical, we are coming, we’re killing every single IRGC commander and officer, and we’re going to install a democracy, all of it transplanted.

Here, they’re trying to basically maneuver an organic uprising, which is why they have been, I mean, Iran is a big country, and we’re talking about 90 million people. And they’ve been hitting targets across all regions,which tells me that they are trying to provoke some sort of organic transition towards whatever the next Iran will be. It will not necessarily be a democracy. It’s going to be a transition. And transition, we don’t really know how long it will take.

But what this administration is making sure of is that it’s just not a hostile entity. You know, I’ve seen like the best data that I’ve seen is that, you know, the Iranian people’s position on the mullahs is about an 80/20 issue, 80 percent sort of against, 20 percent for. Is that correct based on your analysis?

Yes, I think it’s 100 percent correct for a very simple reason. The first one is that when you’re an Islamic republic, you’re not just a theocracy or a dictatorship. They are revolutionaries. They need to send people. They need to train people. They need to teach and educate people, which is why they have so many seminaries across the Middle East, but across Africa as well. And they’ve been trying to have more and more in Europe. And it means that they have always been in the business of creating the next generation of Islamic Republic loyalists and soldiers. A lot of that absolutely collapsed.

All the young people who protested, I think in 2023 during the Mahsa Amini protests, and then more recently, it just shows you that people do not believe in that regime anymore. And you can see that in the capital flight, and you can see that in how the Islamic Republic was completely incompetent when it comes to basic things such as water management. I wrote a whole piece about water management because I think it’s a great indicator when it comes to the health of a governing body. Because it’s really about the allocation of resources to satisfy long-term needs. And they were completely incapable of doing that. The state of water management is absolutely horrifying to the point where I think the president of Iran said that Tehran might no longer be the capital because of how dry it is.

And these things, whether you are pro-Islamic Republic or anti-Islamic Republic, you look at it objectively as a citizen: what is this Islamic Republic giving you? Nothing. And in exchange for what? For hiring Iraqis and Syrians to terrorize everyone in the region. And so it’s a very, I think, basic calculus that people are making even more right now because of its weakness.

There isn’t much of an appetite for regime change in the American electorate. That’s very clear, regardless of political orientation. What you described is very interesting. You’re saying this is regime change, this is the U.S. doing regime change, but in a different way where, if I understand you correctly, we heard President Trump speaking to the Iranian people, saying, here’s your chance. I’m paraphrasing here. But there’s a real possibility of further instability.

I’m always looking at things through this geopolitical lens of China. That’s why your article caught my eye immediately. And China using Iran as a tool of massive distraction, creating instability in the Middle East, to keep America’s gaze on the Middle East and not on the Indo-Pacific, right? I mean, that’s, of course, been a major, major piece of their strategy, right? Now, if this happens quickly, if this goes according to plan in the, you know, timeframe that the president and the Secretary of War and Secretary of State have described, that might be fantastic. But, you know, when you do this sort of thing, there’s a lot of instability. You don’t know how it’s all going to play out ultimately, right?

Like, and one factor we discussed, the Iranian people do not like the mullahs in massive amounts, like 80-20, for sure. That’s different from other, you know, scenarios like this in the past, for sure. But, like, what other things does Iran, you know, as a free or, you know, new, more friendly regime, right, that isn’t revolutionary, that isn’t exporting instability throughout the region and the world? What does that vision have going for it, right? How do we know that we’re not going to just get another source of instability that will precisely prevent the U.S. from looking at its greatest adversary, China, right, under the Communist Party?

I think it’s a very fair question. And I can answer a very simple answer. The United States is destroying everything that would make that possible. Every single launcher, every single missile facility, their whole navy has been absolutely crushed. And you can see that in the loss of military assets that Iran had. I was doing this morning a kind of brief assessment of just looking for where they destroyed, where things are. And you can see that, you know, it’s 2,000 targets so far, and they’re hitting even more. So they are absolutely in the business of making sure that even if the next Iran wants to, it just cannot. And I think that in itself is a very important, I think, premise to work with. And it’s an early assessment and it just tells you where things are going, I think.

But the military aspect and, you know, how they are structurally going to be incapable of launching things at others in the future, in the next few years. I think that’s a very important parameter to evaluate. And the second thing is that there’s the proxy question. Because Iran, the Islamic Republic, is not just, you know, the nuclear program, the missiles. There’s also the proxies. The proxies are also getting hit in this process. They’re hitting their own commanders.

Because for every, for example, Hezbollah unit, you get some IRGC Quds forces getting involved on the Iranian side so that they can train and they can coordinate with proxies in Iraq. They can no longer, by the way, in Syria, but they can still do some damage. And you have Lebanon now absolutely taking drastic measures against Hezbollah. I would have never thought that would have been possible. But the dismantlement of the proxies as well is key to this.

That can be, I think, a very important thing to monitor because you can still have a proxy problem. But it will be of less intensity, I think, than whatever the Islamic Republic was doing. So, the truth is that when people think about how worse it can get, I would say that it has already been worse and that the worst-case scenario, yes, it would be complete fragmentation, you know, maybe a civil war, something of this sort. But so far, this administration is making sure that no one has even the means to fight.

You know, you mentioned Iraq and Syria, Lebanon. I mean, it’s a dangerous neighborhood, okay? And so, you know, you’re kind of making the case that the U.S. is eliminating Iran’s ability to project military power, but also probably defend itself if it doesn’t have those things. So, you know, what’s stopping one of these, like I said, it’s a very dangerous neighborhood there, from coming in and doing their thing and installing their own regime?

I don’t think they will have the capacity. Also, they have to be appealing. As you mentioned, no one believes in those things anymore, at least in Iran, in having a revolutionary mindset. I mean, why? Because they also see how all of their neighbors are modernizing. Azerbaijan is absolutely rising as a power. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, all of the Gulf countries are investing in the youth. They’re investing in modernizing. And so Iranians watch that. Why can’t the government provide that? And I don’t think they will allow the Hezbollah guys or others to insert themselves again. I don’t think they will have the political legitimacy or even the following to install a similar structure.

Latest

Paywall Related

Free for Subscribers

Conversations on current and trending topics.

Latest and breaking news, documentaries, movies, and lifestyle content on NTD+.
 
Empower your knowledge and elevate your spirit with NTD+, your go-to destination for truthful news, insightful documentaries, and captivating lifestyle content that enriches your life.