Trump Pleads Not Guilty to Additional Charges in Documents Case

Petr Svab
By Petr Svab
August 10, 2023Trump Indictment
share

FORT PIERCE, Fla.—Former President Donald Trump pleaded not guilty to three new charges recently added to his indictment related to his keeping some of his presidential papers at his Florida home and allegedly obstructing the government’s efforts to retrieve them.

As expected, President Trump wasn’t present for the Aug. 10 arraignment at the Alto Lee Adams, Sr. U.S. Courthouse in Ft. Pierce, Florida. He submitted his plea through counsel.

Contrary to expectations, however, President Trump’s aide, Waltine Nauta, who also faces charges in the case, showed up in person, also pleading not guilty and communicating through his lawyer, Stanley Woodward, that he intends to take advantage of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

Carlos De Oliveira, the third defendant added to the case with the new charges, lacked permanent counsel and his arraignment was rescheduled for Aug. 15.

The prosecutors, with the office of special counsel Jack Smith, took no questions from the press and didn’t discuss other matters of the case during the arraignment hearing.

NTD Photo
Alto Lee Adams, Sr. U.S. Courthouse in Ft. Pierce, Fla., on Aug. 10, 2023. (T.J. Muscaro/The Epoch Times)

The case was originally brought by Mr. Smith on June 9, charging President Trump with 38 counts of willful retention of national defense information, obstruction, and making false statements.

It alleges that President Trump illegally “caused” boxes with some defense-related information in them to be moved to his home when leaving office and that he later directed Mr. Nauta to move some of the boxes so they couldn’t be searched for documents that the Department of Justice (DOJ) subpoenaed in 2022.

Mr. Smith added three more charges on July 27, alleging that President Trump asked the property manager at his Mar-a-Lago home, Mr. De Oliveira, to have security camera footage deleted after the DOJ subpoenaed some of the footage in June 2022.

President Trump has repeatedly commented publicly that no footage was deleted and denied making any such request.

The presiding district judge, Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, has set that trial for May 2024.

In the latest developments in the case, lawyers of President Trump have asked the judge to allow the former president to reestablish a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) that existed at his home during his time in office so that they can discuss with President Trump classified information involved in the case without the need to travel to a SCIF at a government facility.

One of his lawyers, Todd Blanche, pointed out that traveling to the SCIF facilities would involve Secret Service security measures that “take significant planning and effort, as well as financial resources,” especially if the public learns about the visit beforehand.

“The public facility and surrounding area may need to be closed to the public for a significant period of time to ensure the safety of everyone, including President Trump,” Mr. Blanche said.

The prosecutors have opposed such an arrangement.

President Trump also faces several charges, brought by Mr. Smith in the District of Columbia, related to his efforts to reverse the results of the 2020 election. President Trump’s team says his efforts were to contest the election results through legal means. Another set of charges, for alleged falsifying of business records, was brought earlier this year by New York state prosecutor in Manhattan.

President Trump has pleaded not guilty to all of the charges, calling them politically motivated interference with his 2024 run for president.

Yet more charges are expected to come from a district attorney in Georgia, also related to President Trump’s efforts to challenge the 2020 election.

From The Epoch Times

ntd newsletter icon
Sign up for NTD Daily
What you need to know, summarized in one email.
Stay informed with accurate news you can trust.
By registering for the newsletter, you agree to the Privacy Policy.
Comments