Trump Pleads Not Guilty to Charges in 2020 Election Case

Trump Pleads Not Guilty to Charges in 2020 Election Case
Former President Donald Trump walks over to speak with reporters before he boards his plane at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in Arlington, Va., on Aug. 3, 2023, after facing a judge on federal conspiracy charges that allege he conspired to subvert the 2020 election. (Alex Brandon/AP Photo)

WASHINGTON—Former President Trump has pleaded not guilty to a third set of criminal charges.

Wearing his trademark blue suit, white shirt, and red tie, Mr. Trump, 77, appeared before Magistrate Judge Moxila Upadhyaya on Aug. 3 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, in the nation’s capital.

Flanked by his attorneys, John Lauro on his left and Todd Blanche on his right, Mr. Trump sat at the defense table with a serious expression and occasionally looked at special counsel Jack Smith, the prosecutor who brought the charges against him.

A 45-page indictment, filed on Aug. 1 by Mr. Smith, charges Mr. Trump with criminal conspiracies to defraud the United States, to obstruct the certification of votes for President Joe Biden on Jan. 6, 2021, and against citizens’ right to vote.

Mr. Trump cracked a brief smile after he was sworn in; he listened and nodded as the judge spoke, reading aloud the charges and penalties he faces.

The former president rose to his feet and remained standing while Mr. Lauro went to a podium and began talking, saying that he waived the reading of the full indictment. Asked what his pleading was, Mr. Trump responded, “Not guilty.”

Unlike many other defendants in cases related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol breach, Trump will not be detained, under an agreement between the government and his lawyers. But, under the agreement, he is prevented from discussing the case.

Prosecutors were ordered to file a brief within seven days to suggest a trial date and predict how long the trial might take.

“This case will benefit from normal order, including speedy trial,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas Windom said. The judge replied that the trial will be “fair.”

But Mr. Lauro objected to the government’s proposal of a speedy trial, calling it “absurd.” He pointed out that the government had three years to investigate and accumulate information. Likewise, Mr. Trump’s lawyers need time to prepare a proper defense, he said.

Mr. Lauro also expressed concern over the possibility of “massive” amounts of information to digest, including electronic data, printed documents, and exculpatory information.

Mr. Windom said the government is prepared to produce a “substantial” amount of discovery material.

The next hearing is scheduled to be at 10 a.m. on Aug. 28 before Judge Tanya Chutkan, who’s been assigned to oversee the case. Judge Chutkan intends to set a trial date then, according to Judge Upadhyaya. Mr. Trump has been allowed to waive his appearance at this hearing.

Speaking at Reagan National Airport after the arraignment, Mr. Trump described the event as “a sad day for America.”

Mr. Trump lamented the conditions he observed during his brief visit to the nation’s capital.

“It was also very sad driving through Washington, D.C., and seeing the filth and the decay. This is not the place that I left,” he told reporters before boarding his plane.

The former president reiterated his claim that the case was a political persecution, something that “was never supposed to happen in America.”

“This is the persecution of the person that’s leading by very, very substantial numbers in the Republican primary and leading Biden by a lot,” he said.

“So if you can’t beat him, you persecute him or you prosecute him. We can’t let this happen in America.”

NTD Photo
Press members gather at the E. Barrett Prettyman federal courthouse in Washington on Aug. 3, 2023. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)

Indictment

Mr. Trump’s attorneys argue that the indictment is an attack on the former president’s political speech, which is protected by the Constitution. They also argue that the charges will be defeated because, contrary to Mr. Smith’s allegations that Mr. Trump “knowingly” spread “false claims” about the election, the former president held a genuine belief in the veracity of those claims.

Reporters, security personnel, and attorneys filled the courtroom where Mr. Trump, his attorneys, and prosecutors listened as the judge followed standard procedures, reading the charges aloud and hearing brief remarks from attorneys before accepting Mr. Trump’s denial of the charges and setting the next hearing date.

Mr. Trump alleges that Democrat Joe Biden’s Department of Justice (DOJ) is “weaponized” against him for political reasons. But Mr. Biden denies directing specific DOJ actions against Mr. Trump. Based on current opinion polls, the two appear slated for a rematch in 2024. Mr. Trump has never conceded Mr. Biden’s 2020 election victory and has maintained that the election was “stolen.” His attempts to challenge or overturn the election are now viewed as criminal conduct in a four-count indictment.

Members of the public were excluded from the courtroom. A few viewed the proceedings via closed-circuit monitors in overflow rooms.

NTD Photo
Pro-Trump protesters gather around the E. Barrett Prettyman federal courthouse in Washington on Aug. 3, 2023. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)

Venue

Because 92 percent of votes cast in the District of Columbia in 2020 went to Mr. Biden, Mr. Trump’s lawyers have already said they will attempt to have the trial moved to more hospitable political territory, such as Virginia.

Some of Mr. Trump’s supporters have also raised concerns that, evidenced by her past record, Judge Chutkan might be inclined to deal harshly with Mr. Trump.

She was an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama and handed down harsh prison sentences to other Jan. 6 defendants. Judge Chutkan met or exceeded prosecutors’ sentencing recommendations in those cases.

She also has had past dealings with Mr. Trump and has ruled against him in multiple cases.

In 2021, she rejected Mr. Trump’s claims that executive privilege should have exempted Jan. 6-related White House documents from disclosure. In that case, she wrote that Mr. Trump’s arguments seemed to be based on “the notion that his executive power ‘exists in perpetuity’ … but presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President.”

Defense

Mr. Lauro, in an interview with The Epoch Times’ Jan Jekielek on Aug. 2, said there’s somewhat of a silver lining to this case against Mr. Trump: “This is the first time when there’ll be a full airing of all of the issues in the 2020 election.”

Further, Mr. Lauro said that his client was focused on getting the truth, not blocking it, and that he believed in the veracity of his claims that the election was stolen.

By disclosing six unnamed, uncharged “co-conspirators” in the indictment, Mr. Smith appeared to be attempting to discourage them from testifying on Mr. Trump’s behalf, Mr. Lauro said, because those people will likely fear they could be indicted.

Based on descriptions and context, five of the six co-conspirators are believed to be former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who formerly served as Mr. Trump’s attorney; lawyers John Eastman, Sidney Powell, and Kenneth Cheseboro; and Jeffrey Clark, a former DOJ civil attorney.

Mr. Lauro asserted that Mr. Trump’s lawyers weren’t engaged in illegal conduct when they advised him about his challenges to the election. They were rendering legal advice, he said, and didn’t believe they were doing anything unlawful.

Look Ahead America (LAA), a nonpartisan organization that has been tracking the Jan. 6 cases, added Mr. Trump’s name to its database listing more than “1,000 politically persecuted Americans targeted for protesting the results of the 2020 general election.”

According to LAA, “the overwhelming majority of those arrested and imprisoned were for nonviolent charges, and nobody to date has been charged with insurrection,” despite mainstream news media’s frequent use of that term.

In addition to the Washington charges, Mr. Trump faces dozens of document-mishandling charges under state laws in New York and federal laws in Florida. He has pleaded not guilty in those cases and claims that all of the charges are intended to thwart his third bid for the presidency.

Jackson Richman, Joseph Lord, and Madalina Vasiliu contributed to this story.

From The Epoch Times

ntd newsletter icon
Sign up for NTD Daily
What you need to know, summarized in one email.
Stay informed with accurate news you can trust.
By registering for the newsletter, you agree to the Privacy Policy.
Comments