Former Officer Charged With George Floyd’s Death Files Motion to Dismiss Charges

Janita Kan
By Janita Kan
August 29, 2020US News
share
Former Officer Charged With George Floyd’s Death Files Motion to Dismiss Charges
Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin poses for an undated booking photograph. (Minnesota Department of Corrections/Handout via Reuters)

The lawyers for the former police officer charged with George Floyd’s death have asked a court to dismiss the charges against their client.

In a motion to the court, lawyers for former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin on Friday argued that there was a lack of probable cause supporting the offenses he had been charged with.

Chauvin was charged with second-degree murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter after a video surfaced showing him kneeling on Floyd’s neck for almost nine minutes during an arrest. Floyd died shortly after the incident.

Floyd’s death sparked widespread nationwide protests and riots across the country against police brutality and calling for police reform. It also sparked a movement to “defund the police,” which calls for reallocating funding destined for police departments to social programs, particularly to assist the African American community.

The officer’s lawyers argued that the charges against Chauvin should be dismissed as Floyd had died from a drug overdose.

“Put simply, Mr. Floyd could not breathe because he had ingested a lethal dose of fentanyl,” the motion states (pdf).

The lawyers said the evidence showed that at the time of his death, Floyd had a lethal dose of fentanyl—11 ng/ml—as well as methamphetamine. They added that the medical examiner told prosecutors that overdose from fentanyl “have been certified” with levels as low as 3 ng/ml, citing a report by the Hennepin County Medical Examiner and a conversation between the examiner, Dr. Andrew Baker, and prosecutors.

In that conversation, the medical examiner told prosecutors that if Floyd was found dead alone with no other apparent causes, it would have been “acceptable” to say that he had died from an overdose.

The lawyers also argued that the medical examiner had found no bruising on Floyd’s back or neck, indicating that Chauvin had not intended to inflict harm on Floyd.

“If Mr. Chauvin had intended to inflict harm to Mr. Floyd’s back and neck with his knee, surely there would be evidence of bruising. But clearly, Mr. Chauvin was cautious about the amount of pressure he used to restrain Mr. Floyd—cautious enough to prevent bruising,” the motion said.

On the same day, prosecutors filed a notice that they would be seeking an “upward sentencing departure” in the cases of the all involved officers. The other three officers—J. Alexander Kueng, Thomas Kiernan Lane, and Tou Thao—are charged with aiding and abetting second-degree murder and aiding and abetting second-degree manslaughter.

All four officers pleaded not guilty to the charges.

The prosecutors argued that a harsher sentence was warranted because Floyd “was treated with particular cruelty.”

“Despite Mr. Floyd’s pleas that he could not breathe and was going to die, as well as the pleas of eyewitnesses for Defendant to get off Mr. Floyd and help him, Defendant and his codefendants continued to restrain Mr. Floyd,” they wrote (pdf). “Defendant kept his knee on Mr. Floyd’s neck to hold him prone on the ground for approximately nine minutes, during at least four minutes of which Mr. Floyd was motionless.”

“This maneuver inflicted gratuitous pain on Mr. Floyd,” they wrote.

From The Epoch Times

ntd newsletter icon
Sign up for NTD Daily
What you need to know, summarized in one email.
Stay informed with accurate news you can trust.
By registering for the newsletter, you agree to the Privacy Policy.
Comments